Results 41 to 80 of 124
Thread: Lion vs S-P
-
10-03-2006, 02:49 PM #41
oh MR. LION where arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrre youuu?
-
10-03-2006, 02:50 PM #42Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
The "Real Carlito"? There's only been one Carlito that I've ever known about for the last 5 years...from Mike Strong's board, and Outlaw....
-
10-03-2006, 02:52 PM #43Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Just so everybody knows, the owner of this site has also met Carlito...he's not me, I'm not him, and neither of us are S-P.
-
10-03-2006, 02:52 PM #44Big Pimp
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 216
Originally Posted by Phreak101
I run two separate businesses FYI and you will never find out about it because I do not advertise and if you do is only for an exclusive group of people.
C
-
10-03-2006, 02:56 PM #45Originally Posted by Carlito B
-
10-03-2006, 02:59 PM #46
I posted the same post in Lion's research chem forum as well, we'll see if he responds...
-
10-03-2006, 03:01 PM #47Originally Posted by Phreak101
-
10-03-2006, 03:27 PM #48Big Pimp
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 216
Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
That is true!
And is also true the owner of this board has met me about 4 weeks ago i believe, I apologize to you ( owner ) if I come on to harsh and you know I have no particular interest here like most think but I am angry that these people( some members ) because they were never fair to S-P and never gave him the opportunity.
Thanks,
C
-
10-03-2006, 03:29 PM #49Originally Posted by Phreak101
I don't think that Lion will appreciate you starting trouble between him and S-P.
This thread should have never been posted, you should have asked your questions to S-P by PM or email and let them rebut your claims before you slandering them with accusations.
-
10-03-2006, 03:34 PM #50
For what it's worth I have delt with both Lion Nutrition and S-P in the past they are both reputable companies with great products.
S-P is part of a much larger company which sells research chemicals and much more than just peptides, but I can't mention the name here because they have contractual agreements which prevent them from naming their parent company on this forum. However, they are a very reputable company that I have bought from for years.
Both Lion and S-P have very comparable products. To me this is like arguing about whether coke or pepsi is better.
-
10-03-2006, 03:42 PM #51Originally Posted by cmax
I buy from Lion all the time, and his products for the most part are AOK with me. There is a thread in here with Lion calling out SP's products, specifically the way it is sent. Its entitled "Is my IGF ruined?" or something. All I wanted to accomplish was a public viewing of the companies backing up what they tell us in private. Why keep it private? So I can be lied to or misled?
SP has given me no reason to doubt them, and they seem to have a pretty good speaker on their behalf (Hooker), and ion has never given me reason either. But when one sponsor starts telling people, both publicly and privately, that another sponsors products are bunk, I'm gonna call them out on it, and you seem to be the only one that is NOT interested in the results.
No malice here, I'm just asking for clarification from one sponsor about their claims they made against another sponsor.
-
10-03-2006, 03:43 PM #52Originally Posted by cmax
-
10-03-2006, 03:54 PM #53Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Originally Posted by cmax
It's actually very laughable, and I think the people who thought S-P was me would feel very stupid to find out who S-P actually is....
it's actually kind of funny for people to think that I'm them...really, if you know who they are, you know that I AM NOT THEM....I only became personally acquainted with them this year, and they've been in buisness for years.
This is as funny (read: idiotic) as when people thought I was Lion a few months ago on another board....
-
10-03-2006, 03:57 PM #54Originally Posted by Phreak101
It's best to gather your evidence in private and make claims against them directly so that you can actually build up a case before you go slandering them.
It sounds like you have no proof of anything you say.
You claim the following:
I have been told by someone I trust, as they would have no reason for telling me otherwise, that Lion has claimed that S-P's IGF-1 did not test as IGF, and real IGF needs to be shipped on ice.
So you heard from "someone" that Lion might have said "something" about S-P products.
(1) You did not hear this directly from Lion, you heard this from "someone" who might be FOS and might have changed his actual words.
(2) You don't have any proof or test results that prove that the IGF-1 is fake.
(3) Lion is a competitor of S-P so by nature he is going to be biased against them and vice versa.
So why exactly did Lion delete this thread from his own section if those were truly his words?
It looks to me like he does not want you speaking for him and causing trouble between him and a competitor.
You're lucky that these are small time businesses and your just some random joe, because if you were actually someone significant who people would actually listen to and you did this with two large corporations you would have your ass handed to you on a platter in the court room.
Small businesses have rights just like people do.Last edited by cmax; 10-03-2006 at 04:04 PM.
-
10-03-2006, 04:02 PM #55Originally Posted by Phreak101
If you can't do this then I have no reason to believe anything you say. If it is a public statement then it should be readily available for everyone.
-
10-03-2006, 04:04 PM #56Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Originally Posted by cmax
So it's appropriate to come here and set things right, and either fess up for actually saying those things, and provide lab tests, deny ever saying them....or....whatever the case may be.
-
10-03-2006, 04:10 PM #57Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
He posted this thread verbatim over in Lion's area and it was deleted, so he reposted a new post making reference to the existence of this thread and asking why his original post had been deleted.
I also give credit to S-P for not deleting this claim against their integrity.
-
10-03-2006, 04:11 PM #58
BOLD
Originally Posted by cmax
-
10-03-2006, 04:18 PM #59Originally Posted by Carlito B
-
10-03-2006, 04:18 PM #60
Whatever...
I'm sorry if my negative attitude bothers you, but really I am speaking my opinion. You know as well as I do that no one can get a straight answer to their questions. A few good people that have been with this forum for years have left this forum because of quote/unquote B.S. on this board. Get some straight answers to the questions people have on the products. No one else seems to have a problem with my outspoken-ness. And for the record I am female as you can see by my avi, so I dont give a shit if you are male or female since you have a car representing your face!
-
10-03-2006, 04:18 PM #61
Provide links to lions actual words and post them in this thread. If you cannot do this then I will not believe a word you are saying.
You have not been able to back up any of your claims. If you provide links to his actual words then people might actually have a reason to believe you.
You obviously know absolutely nothing about libel and slander laws.
So McDonald's is gonna sue me for telling people their meat is made out of sawdust? Please, save your drama for your mama and don't spout semantic law to me.
-
10-03-2006, 04:21 PM #62Originally Posted by cmax
AR Sponsor Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,917
Re: igf is bad
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
the igf they are selling didn't test as igf. I don't know what to tell you ...visit one of our other stores. we still have it there.
Hey Cmax,
The person on this board allowed me access to these as proof that he was not lying. I don't know what else to show you. This is NOT my personal crusade, i do not have problems with EITHER OF THEM!
I'll state this again, I AM SIMPLY CONCERNED WHY ONE SPONSOR WHO HAS THE ABILITY TO MONITOR THE INFO WE SEE IS BASHING ANOTHER'S PRODUCT!Last edited by Phreak101; 10-03-2006 at 04:26 PM.
-
10-03-2006, 04:22 PM #63
That's not a link to a publicly made claim in a thread that you said you had about above. Where is this thread you are talking about?
I want to read it for myself, don't cut-and-paste the words here, give us the actual link to the thread.
How do I know that those are his actual words?
Originally Posted by Phreak101
I have found the same unsurpassed level of maturity in many of your other posts here as well. You are quite an asset to this site!Last edited by cmax; 10-03-2006 at 04:28 PM.
-
10-03-2006, 04:30 PM #64Originally Posted by cmax
If I save 1 person from spending $500 for nothing, I think everyone will agree I'm a better asset than yourself.
I don't want to argue with you, I just want some clarification. i am done bashing and posting, no need to escalate this to another riot.
-
10-03-2006, 04:32 PM #65
...........
Last edited by jdog55; 10-03-2006 at 04:54 PM. Reason: .
-
10-03-2006, 04:33 PM #66
Ok, I am done too.
I just wanted to state my faith in S-P products and the good experiences that I have had with them and their parent company in the past.
-
10-03-2006, 04:38 PM #67Originally Posted by cmax
It was just a very weird occurence and I, along with many others, am curious as to why it happened.
Again, NO MALICE TOWARDS EITHER!
-
10-03-2006, 04:41 PM #68Big Pimp
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 216
Originally Posted by cmax
thanks for posting that!
phreak101 is an instigator and this is nothing but poisonous BS only some old nosy women would do not us grown men.
C
-
10-03-2006, 04:42 PM #69Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 147
S-P should not be sending out their IGF-1 without an ice pack if it is already constituted. If they send out their powder and liquids separately it would be fine, but in NO WAY WHATSOEVER SHOULD THEY BE SENDING WARM CONSTITUTED IGF-1 if they do this then their SOLUTION WILL BE RUINED!
PEROID.
-
10-03-2006, 04:42 PM #70Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 147
S-P should not be sending out their IGF-1 without an ice pack if it is already constituted. If they send out their powder and liquids separately it would be fine, but in NO WAY WHATSOEVER SHOULD THEY BE SENDING WARM CONSTITUTED IGF-1 if they do this then their SOLUTION WILL BE RUINED!
PEROID.
-
10-03-2006, 04:46 PM #71Originally Posted by Carlito B
-
10-03-2006, 04:59 PM #72Originally Posted by clomid222
do you have any back to this claim?
-
10-03-2006, 05:01 PM #73Big Pimp
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 216
Originally Posted by Brie
BTW anabolicandre, love the avatar
C
-
10-03-2006, 05:08 PM #74Originally Posted by clomid222
-
10-03-2006, 05:18 PM #75
here is the thread in controversy
Is ths the thread you are all excited about? Its a few threads down from this one. wtf? if my IGF ruined?
Lion asserts that shipping reconstituted igf is bad, s-p responds that its ok.
-
10-03-2006, 05:29 PM #76Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 147
Originally Posted by Phreak101
It is better to purchase IGF-1 separated because it will stay good longer and is less susceptible to being damaged by heat. I would only buy IGF-1 that has not yet been reconstituted. Forget about dealing with ICE packs and the risk of it being damaged by the heat. You always want to buy your compounds in the most stable form which for IGF-1 is lyophilized or (in Powder form).
If you want a good reference on this matter ask Russ Scala the director of Research & Development at Signature Compounding Pharmacy in Orlando, Florida. The IGF-1 that he produces is far superior to research grade IGF-1 and their entire lab is FDA approved. They will tell you the same thing that I am telling you. Google "Russ Scala" and ask him these questions. He is a credible expert in these matters.Last edited by clomid222; 10-03-2006 at 05:33 PM.
-
10-03-2006, 05:36 PM #77Originally Posted by clomid222
The knowledge you posted I would bet is correct, but again, we have to be cautious as to who we believe.
-
10-03-2006, 05:38 PM #78Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 147
Originally Posted by comradebillyboy
If I personally had to choose between the two products I would definitely buy the Lyophilized IGF-1 even if it costs more.
Hey steroid -peptides, why do you sell reconstituted IGF-1 rather than Lyophilized?
This does not make any sense. It must be cheaper this way for some reason.
-
10-03-2006, 05:44 PM #79Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 147
Originally Posted by Phreak101
I am just trying to state an obvious fact... that IGF-1 in powder form is superior.
That IGF-1 that you bought that came in liquid form was made from a powder. It was a powder before it was a liquid. Right?
Well wouldn't you rather have that powder that was used to make the liquid so that you could mix it yourself and know that it is still good? Or would you rather have some unknown solution that you don't know the history of?
This seems like a no-brainer to me.
-
10-03-2006, 05:52 PM #80Originally Posted by clomid222
My concern is how can people be expected to come here for safe and solid advice when we have two different "experts" telling us different things and/or slandering each other's products? People are accusing me of bashing Lion and/or SP and instigating trouble, but I would imagine people would like to know these things before they risk their money and their health. To me, that seems like a no brainer..Last edited by Phreak101; 10-03-2006 at 05:59 PM.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS