Results 1 to 37 of 37
  1. #1
    Teabagger's Avatar
    Teabagger is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    west of the rockies
    Posts
    454

    UN passes another useless resolution

    The UN Security Council passed a resolution giving Iran until August 31 to suspend uranium enrichment or face possible ecomonic and diplomatic sanctions!!! wooooo Iran is now sooooo scared!!! The resolution excluded any military enforcement wooooo, so the UN is saying in its strongest language......"pretty please with sugar on top, stop enriching uranimum for a nuke bomb"....wooooo pretty tough talk from the UN.....

  2. #2
    spywizard's Avatar
    spywizard is offline AR-Elite Hall of Famer~
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    In the Gym, if i could
    Posts
    15,929
    The answer to your every question

    Rules

    A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted
    to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially
    one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs.


    If you get scammed by an UGL listed on this board or by another member here, it's all part of the game and learning experience for you,
    we do not approve nor support any sources that may be listed on this site.
    I will not do source checks for you, the peer review from other members should be enough to help you make a decision on your quest. Buyer beware.
    Don't Let the Police kick your ass

  3. #3
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359
    Quote Originally Posted by Teabagger
    The UN Security Council passed a resolution giving Iran until August 31 to suspend uranium enrichment or face possible ecomonic and diplomatic sanctions!!! wooooo Iran is now sooooo scared!!! The resolution excluded any military enforcement wooooo, so the UN is saying in its strongest language......"pretty please with sugar on top, stop enriching uranimum for a nuke bomb"....wooooo pretty tough talk from the UN.....
    well no country wants to go to war with Iran so its not unexpected.

  4. #4
    Teabagger's Avatar
    Teabagger is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    west of the rockies
    Posts
    454
    Quote Originally Posted by johan
    well no country wants to go to war with Iran so its not unexpected.
    This is true. Just as no country wanted to go to war with Germany in the 1930's when it was violating the terms of Versailles and re-arming after WWI.

  5. #5
    alphaman is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    The Couch
    Posts
    956
    It's because Russia and China won't go for their sanctioning. Even if they don't stop the enrichment, they can't be sanctioned w/out further discussions per China and Russia.

  6. #6
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359
    Quote Originally Posted by Teabagger
    This is true. Just as no country wanted to go to war with Germany in the 1930's when it was violating the terms of Versailles and re-arming after WWI.
    but Iran isnt a world power and cant do anything like germany did during ww2 so it isnt a good comparison. Germany almost counquered all of europe and almost won a world war. Iran on the other hand can create some regional drama and get squised if they do something stupid.

  7. #7
    Kale is offline ~ Vet~ I like Thai Girls
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Asia
    Posts
    12,114
    Quote Originally Posted by johan
    but Iran isnt a world power and cant do anything like germany did during ww2 so it isnt a good comparison. Germany almost counquered all of europe and almost won a world war. Iran on the other hand can create some regional drama and get squised if they do something stupid.
    Exactly !!! I seriously to not understand all the scaremongering comming out of the US over Iran and North Korea, its a joke. Neither of those tard countries can do shit and if they did they would be parking lots in seconds !!!

  8. #8
    Grappler13's Avatar
    Grappler13 is offline Productive Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Way out there
    Posts
    792

    Un!

    Is the UN really the representation, the great well of hope for world peace and unity? Good grief, every one of its resolutions are useless. Its "peacekeeping" forces are pathetic, its internal rules: archaic, and uber-bureaucratic (thus requiring the expertise of none other than more UN bureaucrats to administer the worthlessness of the institution).

    Kofi Anan is an abject embarassment as leader of the de facto "voice" of world unity. My god, Zimbabwe sits on the UN Commission on Human Rights: http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu2/2/chrmem.htm

    IMHO, every last cent, shilling, euro, etc. given to this pathetic organization would just as well be dropped in a well.

    UN=

  9. #9
    singern's Avatar
    singern is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Chicago/Israel
    Posts
    946
    Quote Originally Posted by Kale
    Exactly !!! I seriously to not understand all the scaremongering comming out of the US over Iran and North Korea, its a joke. Neither of those tard countries can do shit and if they did they would be parking lots in seconds !!!
    That's easy,
    1) Iran is in process of getting Nukes.
    2) Iran's political leaders openly state the desire to eradicate a sovereign nation (Israel), and all the Jews within.
    3) Iran's Religious leaders have made clear the desire to reshape the middle east into one big religious zealot like nation. Which scares the hell out of moderate Arab states in the region.

    So you see Iran is a threat to be taken seriously, and should be dealt with seriously.

  10. #10
    Phreak101's Avatar
    Phreak101 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    2,056
    Quote Originally Posted by singern
    That's easy,
    1) Iran is in process of getting Nukes.
    2) Iran's political leaders openly state the desire to eradicate a sovereign nation (Israel), and all the Jews within.
    3) Iran's Religious leaders have made clear the desire to reshape the middle east into one big religious zealot like nation. Which scares the hell out of moderate Arab states in the region.

    So you see Iran is a threat to be taken seriously, and should be dealt with seriously.
    Bingo, don't forget, Germany had just been crushed after WW1, and their nation was in ruins. Hitler rose Germany from the ashes with massive propoganda and mechanization, and proved it only takes one man to rally a nation to become another major threat to the world in under 30 years.
    Last edited by Phreak101; 08-01-2006 at 09:17 AM.

  11. #11
    alphaman is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    The Couch
    Posts
    956

  12. #12
    3Vandoo's Avatar
    3Vandoo is offline AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Bandit County
    Posts
    0
    I dont get it

    next parliement sessions, just send a couple missiles down their halls

    you kill all the political scene in a fraction of a second and you will see the people going in the street against that so beautiful regime of islamofacismnazismretarded government

  13. #13
    DontBanMe's Avatar
    DontBanMe is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    35
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_by_country

    Every country has the right to progress, and acquire nuclear power.

  14. #14
    RA's Avatar
    RA
    RA is offline Grade A Beef
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Getting madcow treatments
    Posts
    16,450
    Quote Originally Posted by DontBanMe
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_by_country

    Every country has the right to progress, and acquire nuclear power.


    Not if they threaten free countries..no they dont.

  15. #15
    DontBanMe's Avatar
    DontBanMe is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by roidattack
    Not if they threaten free countries..no they dont.
    Has the US or Israel or Russia threatened free countries?

    Lebanon is a free country. Let me guess there is an excuse somewhere?

  16. #16
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359
    Quote Originally Posted by DontBanMe
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_by_country

    Every country has the right to progress, and acquire nuclear power.
    if you mean power than yes, if you mean weapons than no.

  17. #17
    collar's Avatar
    collar is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    6,150
    so let me get this right.
    some countries can have nuclear power. The countries that try to have any, other "countries" say its not right and they are building a war weapon against freedom.

    lol give me a break..

  18. #18
    sofus99's Avatar
    sofus99 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    178
    I still applaud the hypocrisy of saying "OK, so we have nukes, but YOU can't have them because we consider you a threat to world peace bla bla...".

    Start by destroying all your own nuclear weapons, THEN you can point your dirty fingers at other countries!

  19. #19
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359
    Quote Originally Posted by sofus99
    I still applaud the hypocrisy of saying "OK, so we have nukes, but YOU can't have them because we consider you a threat to world peace bla bla...".

    Start by destroying all your own nuclear weapons, THEN you can point your dirty fingers at other countries!
    I dont think its hypocritical to ensure no more nuclear weapons get built in this world. I agree that the states and russia should start downsizing there arsenals. No one needs 10 000 warheads anyway.

    When it comes to nuclear weapons not everyone has a right to them. They are far to dangerous for that. No one should have them. But we dont live in a perfect world and I can live with usa, russia, france, uk, china and israel having nukes. Atleast I know none of those countries would use them unless beeing forced into it.

  20. #20
    sofus99's Avatar
    sofus99 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    178
    Yeah, especially Israel, they seem to be acting very sensible at the moment

  21. #21
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359
    Quote Originally Posted by sofus99
    Yeah, especially Israel, they seem to be acting very sensible at the moment
    well they arent nuking anyone and thats whats important.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    5,506
    Quote Originally Posted by johan
    But we dont live in a perfect world and I can live with usa, russia, france, uk, china and israel having nukes. Atleast I know none of those countries would use them unless beeing forced into it.
    Don't forget Pakistan and India... India doesn't worry me, but I have my doubts about Pakistan.

    Red

  23. #23
    Phreak101's Avatar
    Phreak101 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    2,056
    Quote Originally Posted by sofus99
    I still applaud the hypocrisy of saying "OK, so we have nukes, but YOU can't have them because we consider you a threat to world peace bla bla...".

    Start by destroying all your own nuclear weapons, THEN you can point your dirty fingers at other countries!
    This is one of the stupidest things I've heard today!

    Explain to me how any of the superpowers have used their nukes aggressively? Comparing Iran or North Korea to the USA or Russia on the same playing field in terms of having nuclear weapons is beyond ludicrous, and can't really be taken seriously....

    Do you call police hypocritical for having guns but saying you can't use yours whenever you please? Of course not....you need to demonstrate you can properly handle a gun and be responsible with it, and then you get a permit. (It may not be that simple, but read between the lines and you'll get my point)

    None of the countries in question have demonstrated politically or militarily that they can be responsible with nuclear weapons. Why would we allow Iran to have nuclear weapons when their leader has publically stated that it wants to wipe a country off the map? Why would we give NK nuclear missles if they are already test launching missles trying to prove they can reach the US?

    Your suggestion is based on a perfect world. This is not a perfect world. DOwnsize nuclear arsenals? Yes! Eliminate all of them or allow everyone to have them? Yeah, right.....
    Last edited by Phreak101; 08-02-2006 at 10:11 AM.

  24. #24
    Phreak101's Avatar
    Phreak101 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    2,056
    Quote Originally Posted by sofus99
    Yeah, especially Israel, they seem to be acting very sensible at the moment
    Because putting missle depots among the very civilians you are "protecting" is very sensible...

  25. #25
    elite2kr is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    666
    To me it just seems like these radical muslims are the problem. I mean you dont see the buhdist taking up arms.

  26. #26
    collar's Avatar
    collar is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    6,150
    ROFL useless thread.

  27. #27
    Logan13's Avatar
    Logan13 is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,740

    thanks!

    Quote Originally Posted by collar
    ROFL useless thread.
    thanks for your well thought-out input...........

  28. #28
    alphaman is offline Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    The Couch
    Posts
    956

  29. #29
    Mel Gibson's Avatar
    Mel Gibson is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by elite2kr
    To me it just seems like these radical muslims are the problem. I mean you dont see the buhdist taking up arms.
    Are you sure about that?

    First Ghengis Khan was a buddhist. The Japanese with their Kamakazi fighters were Buddhists.

    This one talks about Buddhist Priests, roasting and cooking babies.

    http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0011/S00003.htm

    Even Buddhist Monks can become "terrorist" bombers, when their country is occupied by China.

    http://www.tibet.cn/english/news/200...1231114030.htm

    More "terrorist" bombings by Buddhists from Tibet.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asi...ic/2683807.stm

    Today Hindus in Sri Lanka are killing hundreds in "terrorist" style wars. Tamil Tigers, did the media show this?

    Media has become the the whole reality for people. And since it is controlled by the Zionists, they will shape your reality.

  30. #30
    Mel Gibson's Avatar
    Mel Gibson is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by alphaman

  31. #31
    Mel Gibson's Avatar
    Mel Gibson is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by Phreak101
    This is one of the stupidest things I've heard today!

    Explain to me how any of the superpowers have used their nukes aggressively? Comparing Iran or North Korea to the USA or Russia on the same playing field in terms of having nuclear weapons is beyond ludicrous, and can't really be taken seriously....
    Really?

    Who is the only country to every use nukes?

    Iran has only fought 1 war, and that was when Iraq invaded it with US support, and Iran defended itself.

    On the other hand the US and Russia go on a bombing campaign all over the world.

    The fact that you even thought about making this comparsion, shows you know nothing.

  32. #32
    Mel Gibson's Avatar
    Mel Gibson is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by Phreak101
    Because putting missle depots among the very civilians you are "protecting" is very sensible...
    Any proof for these allegations? Or are you repeating what you hear on TV like roidattack.

    Not opinions, show me some proof.

  33. #33
    Teabagger's Avatar
    Teabagger is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    west of the rockies
    Posts
    454
    Japanese were Shinto...Khan was a pagan, prove the rest. I don't believe anything you say...you distort and lie....

  34. #34
    collar's Avatar
    collar is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    6,150
    Quote Originally Posted by Logan13
    thanks for your well thought-out input...........
    oh come on mate...

  35. #35
    Mel Gibson's Avatar
    Mel Gibson is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by Teabagger
    Japanese were Shinto...Khan was a pagan, prove the rest. I don't believe anything you say...you distort and lie....
    Japanese culture is Shinto and Buddhism, and both intertwined.

    Anyway that doesnt matter.

    About the Buddhists that have staged a supposed violent campaign to gain freedom for Tibet, you dont belive that?

    http://www.tibet.ca/en/wtnarchive/2003/1/27_3.html

    http://www.friendsoftibet.org/databa.../tibeta11.html

    http://www.studentsforafreetibet.org/article.php?id=504

    http://www.tibet.com/Humanrights/hr150596.html

    http://www.tibet.com/Humanrights/hr150596.html

  36. #36
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359
    Quote Originally Posted by Mel Gibson
    Japanese culture is Shinto and Buddhism, and both intertwined.

    Anyway that doesnt matter.

    About the Buddhists that have staged a supposed violent campaign to gain freedom for Tibet, you dont belive that?

    http://www.tibet.ca/en/wtnarchive/2003/1/27_3.html

    http://www.friendsoftibet.org/databa.../tibeta11.html

    http://www.studentsforafreetibet.org/article.php?id=504

    http://www.tibet.com/Humanrights/hr150596.html

    http://www.tibet.com/Humanrights/hr150596.html
    Atleast the buddhist leaders doesnt scream for blood. When was the last time dalai lama encourgaed violent resistance towards china=

  37. #37
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359
    Quote Originally Posted by alphaman
    I hope someday the Irani people will realise what a nutjob that ****er is.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •