-
07-31-2006, 03:04 PM #1
UN passes another useless resolution
The UN Security Council passed a resolution giving Iran until August 31 to suspend uranium enrichment or face possible ecomonic and diplomatic sanctions!!! wooooo Iran is now sooooo scared!!! The resolution excluded any military enforcement wooooo, so the UN is saying in its strongest language......"pretty please with sugar on top, stop enriching uranimum for a nuke bomb"....wooooo pretty tough talk from the UN.....
-
07-31-2006, 03:06 PM #2
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp...c=Worldupdates
i think this is the storyThe answer to your every question
Rules
A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted
to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially
one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs.
If you get scammed by an UGL listed on this board or by another member here, it's all part of the game and learning experience for you,
we do not approve nor support any sources that may be listed on this site.
I will not do source checks for you, the peer review from other members should be enough to help you make a decision on your quest. Buyer beware.
Don't Let the Police kick your ass
-
07-31-2006, 04:00 PM #3Originally Posted by Teabagger
-
07-31-2006, 07:30 PM #4Originally Posted by johan
-
07-31-2006, 07:49 PM #5Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- The Couch
- Posts
- 956
It's because Russia and China won't go for their sanctioning. Even if they don't stop the enrichment, they can't be sanctioned w/out further discussions per China and Russia.
-
08-01-2006, 05:11 AM #6Originally Posted by Teabagger
-
08-01-2006, 05:55 AM #7~ Vet~ I like Thai Girls
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Asia
- Posts
- 12,114
Originally Posted by johan
-
08-01-2006, 06:52 AM #8
Un!
Is the UN really the representation, the great well of hope for world peace and unity? Good grief, every one of its resolutions are useless. Its "peacekeeping" forces are pathetic, its internal rules: archaic, and uber-bureaucratic (thus requiring the expertise of none other than more UN bureaucrats to administer the worthlessness of the institution).
Kofi Anan is an abject embarassment as leader of the de facto "voice" of world unity. My god, Zimbabwe sits on the UN Commission on Human Rights: http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu2/2/chrmem.htm
IMHO, every last cent, shilling, euro, etc. given to this pathetic organization would just as well be dropped in a well.
UN=
-
08-01-2006, 08:49 AM #9Originally Posted by Kale
1) Iran is in process of getting Nukes.
2) Iran's political leaders openly state the desire to eradicate a sovereign nation (Israel), and all the Jews within.
3) Iran's Religious leaders have made clear the desire to reshape the middle east into one big religious zealot like nation. Which scares the hell out of moderate Arab states in the region.
So you see Iran is a threat to be taken seriously, and should be dealt with seriously.
-
08-01-2006, 09:14 AM #10Originally Posted by singern
Last edited by Phreak101; 08-01-2006 at 09:17 AM.
-
08-01-2006, 06:50 PM #11Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- The Couch
- Posts
- 956
Did you guys see this?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060801/...a/iran_nuclear
-
08-01-2006, 08:42 PM #12
I dont get it
next parliement sessions, just send a couple missiles down their halls
you kill all the political scene in a fraction of a second and you will see the people going in the street against that so beautiful regime of islamofacismnazismretarded government
-
08-01-2006, 09:40 PM #13
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_by_country
Every country has the right to progress, and acquire nuclear power.
-
08-01-2006, 09:53 PM #14Originally Posted by DontBanMe
Not if they threaten free countries..no they dont.
-
08-01-2006, 09:55 PM #15Originally Posted by roidattack
Lebanon is a free country. Let me guess there is an excuse somewhere?
-
08-02-2006, 02:19 AM #16Originally Posted by DontBanMe
-
08-02-2006, 02:27 AM #17
so let me get this right.
some countries can have nuclear power. The countries that try to have any, other "countries" say its not right and they are building a war weapon against freedom.
lol give me a break..
-
08-02-2006, 04:23 AM #18
I still applaud the hypocrisy of saying "OK, so we have nukes, but YOU can't have them because we consider you a threat to world peace bla bla...".
Start by destroying all your own nuclear weapons, THEN you can point your dirty fingers at other countries!
-
08-02-2006, 04:53 AM #19Originally Posted by sofus99
When it comes to nuclear weapons not everyone has a right to them. They are far to dangerous for that. No one should have them. But we dont live in a perfect world and I can live with usa, russia, france, uk, china and israel having nukes. Atleast I know none of those countries would use them unless beeing forced into it.
-
08-02-2006, 05:26 AM #20
Yeah, especially Israel, they seem to be acting very sensible at the moment
-
08-02-2006, 05:31 AM #21Originally Posted by sofus99
-
08-02-2006, 06:39 AM #22Originally Posted by johan
Red
-
08-02-2006, 10:05 AM #23Originally Posted by sofus99
Explain to me how any of the superpowers have used their nukes aggressively? Comparing Iran or North Korea to the USA or Russia on the same playing field in terms of having nuclear weapons is beyond ludicrous, and can't really be taken seriously....
Do you call police hypocritical for having guns but saying you can't use yours whenever you please? Of course not....you need to demonstrate you can properly handle a gun and be responsible with it, and then you get a permit. (It may not be that simple, but read between the lines and you'll get my point)
None of the countries in question have demonstrated politically or militarily that they can be responsible with nuclear weapons. Why would we allow Iran to have nuclear weapons when their leader has publically stated that it wants to wipe a country off the map? Why would we give NK nuclear missles if they are already test launching missles trying to prove they can reach the US?
Your suggestion is based on a perfect world. This is not a perfect world. DOwnsize nuclear arsenals? Yes! Eliminate all of them or allow everyone to have them? Yeah, right.....Last edited by Phreak101; 08-02-2006 at 10:11 AM.
-
08-02-2006, 10:13 AM #24Originally Posted by sofus99
-
08-02-2006, 01:09 PM #25Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 666
To me it just seems like these radical muslims are the problem. I mean you dont see the buhdist taking up arms.
-
08-02-2006, 06:02 PM #26
ROFL useless thread.
-
08-03-2006, 12:41 PM #27
thanks!
Originally Posted by collar
-
08-03-2006, 09:48 PM #28Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- The Couch
- Posts
- 956
Here he goes again.......
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060803/...N5bnN1YmNhdA--
-
08-03-2006, 10:07 PM #29Originally Posted by elite2kr
First Ghengis Khan was a buddhist. The Japanese with their Kamakazi fighters were Buddhists.
This one talks about Buddhist Priests, roasting and cooking babies.
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0011/S00003.htm
Even Buddhist Monks can become "terrorist" bombers, when their country is occupied by China.
http://www.tibet.cn/english/news/200...1231114030.htm
More "terrorist" bombings by Buddhists from Tibet.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asi...ic/2683807.stm
Today Hindus in Sri Lanka are killing hundreds in "terrorist" style wars. Tamil Tigers, did the media show this?
Media has become the the whole reality for people. And since it is controlled by the Zionists, they will shape your reality.
-
08-03-2006, 10:10 PM #30Originally Posted by alphaman
-
08-03-2006, 10:21 PM #31Originally Posted by Phreak101
Who is the only country to every use nukes?
Iran has only fought 1 war, and that was when Iraq invaded it with US support, and Iran defended itself.
On the other hand the US and Russia go on a bombing campaign all over the world.
The fact that you even thought about making this comparsion, shows you know nothing.
-
08-03-2006, 10:24 PM #32Originally Posted by Phreak101
Not opinions, show me some proof.
-
08-03-2006, 10:24 PM #33
Japanese were Shinto...Khan was a pagan, prove the rest. I don't believe anything you say...you distort and lie....
-
08-03-2006, 10:28 PM #34Originally Posted by Logan13
-
08-03-2006, 10:33 PM #35Originally Posted by Teabagger
Anyway that doesnt matter.
About the Buddhists that have staged a supposed violent campaign to gain freedom for Tibet, you dont belive that?
http://www.tibet.ca/en/wtnarchive/2003/1/27_3.html
http://www.friendsoftibet.org/databa.../tibeta11.html
http://www.studentsforafreetibet.org/article.php?id=504
http://www.tibet.com/Humanrights/hr150596.html
http://www.tibet.com/Humanrights/hr150596.html
-
08-04-2006, 01:10 AM #36Originally Posted by Mel Gibson
-
08-04-2006, 01:13 AM #37Originally Posted by alphaman
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
11-11-2024, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS