Solution to the middle east conflict

**Kärnfysikern** · 08-18-2006, 05:41 PM

Originally Posted by Venomous Nemisis

Listen kid
insted of listening to whatever shyt your being spoon-fed and basing your retarded 20year old insight off what your cousin told you, why don't YOU go out and get some real world experience, and I don't mean mopping floors

I suggest you stop with that attitude or find another board.

**Kärnfysikern** · 08-18-2006, 05:46 PM

Originally Posted by k0nsl

Here is a incomplete list of Jews running the media:
http://www.simpletoremember.com/vita...-Hollywood.htm

I dont se what that proves? Its not like all jews are in on some grand conspiracy to take over the world. Those people probably compete for the same markets and would cut eachothers troaths if it would give some more profit just like all buisness leaders of all colors and races in all industries.

**tiger909** · 08-18-2006, 09:15 PM

Originally Posted by Phreak101

You said

"you tellin me this isnt widescale....and it was ALL necassary

this is indiscriminate bombing of wide areas of beirut, not precision guided missiles aimed at the enemy"

My original post for this thread explained the analogy of beating down someone so bad that they are forced to give up. Widescale bombing of Beirut were the equivalent of the Latino beating the marine to a pulp so he would not try to his nonsense again.

is that legal, ethical, or even rational

that is why i said the analogy is irrelevant to the conflict

**k0nsl** · 08-19-2006, 04:42 AM

Originally Posted by johan

I dont se what that proves? Its not like all jews are in on some grand conspiracy to take over the world. Those people probably compete for the same markets and would cut eachothers troaths if it would give some more profit just like all buisness leaders of all colors and races in all industries.

I never alleged what you write. I did respond to a request by MgMc31 which stated:

I've heard this a number of times, but I have yet to hear evidence of this.

And thusly posted a incomplete list of Jews who are in control of various media. Of course they would not influence their opinion on other people. Heavens no.

**Kärnfysikern** · 08-19-2006, 04:56 AM

Originally Posted by k0nsl

I never alleged what you write. I did respond to a request by MgMc31 which stated:

And thusly posted a incomplete list of Jews who are in control of various media. Of course they would not influence their opinion on other people. Heavens no.

But you are implying that just because alot of jews have high positions in the media that they are influencing the american public to have a pro israeli stance.

In reality they probably has as much difference of oppinion betwen them as any other humans. I am willing to bet most of them care alot more about making a profit than they care about israel.

The media in the nordic countries are surely not influenced by jews and often say the same things as american media. I got to admit though that the avarage scandinavian is alot less pro israeli than the avarage american.

**eliteforce** · 08-19-2006, 06:05 AM

I think the person that started this thread is just pissed off because Israel lost 118 men and a bunch of tanks penitrating about 1or 2 km into Lebanon..they appeared to have been blunted..i have read reports of Israeli soldiers complaining that the IDF provided them with inadequate training and that they had to drink water from dead hez fighters because they were not being resupplied 2 km into Lebanon..you win a battle on the battlefield against the opposing army not by bombing apartment buildings.

**k0nsl** · 08-19-2006, 08:40 AM

Originally Posted by johan

The media in the nordic countries are surely not influenced by jews and often say the same things as american media. I got to admit though that the avarage scandinavian is alot less pro israeli than the avarage american.

I agree with the last part. Denmark, when they aired those caricatures, said they would consider printing and showing drawings of the Jews 'holiest of the holies', but naturally they withdrew this offer rather quickly. That is just one example.

Originally Posted by johan

But you are implying that just because alot of jews have high positions in the media that they are influencing the american public to have a pro israeli stance.

American Foreign Policy probably takes care of that better - the Jewish dominated media is only the icing of the sour cake.

**Phreak101** · 08-21-2006, 12:38 PM

Originally Posted by johan

I got to admit though that the avarage scandinavian is alot less pro israeli than the avarage american.

I, like most of my countrymen, are not so much pro-israel as we are anti-islamic fundamentalist.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend, so to speak.

**Phreak101** · 08-21-2006, 12:41 PM

Originally Posted by tiger909

is that legal, ethical, or even rational

that is why i said the analogy is irrelevant to the conflict

Rational? If someone was picking on me people I care about, I would knock him the **** out as to make sure he knows not to do it again. That seems rational enough to me, problem solved.

Ethical? Explain to me how one can have ethics in a conflict that involves nothing but hatred towards one another....

Legal? All's fair in love and war...

The analogy is perfectly relevant, it's just not in support of the side you are for, so you're bashing it...