Thread: David Duke on Wolf Blitzer
-
01-22-2007, 09:56 PM #81Originally Posted by singern
You denied Wolfowitz controlled the world bank, I proved you wrong, with a link to the world bank website...
again before you compare my claims to aliens, What have I claimed that you would like like me to prove???
And where do you get off calling me hateful? My father is a jewish-american as are my grand parents, they are all incredibly intelligent people, and they all agree with my "wild conspiracy" claims.Last edited by juicedOUTbrain; 01-23-2007 at 11:20 AM.
-
01-22-2007, 10:07 PM #82Originally Posted by juicedOUTbrain
Im off to have tea with the Ayatollah (who by the way is a closet Catholic) Honestly I read it in the Enquirer.
You win.
-
01-22-2007, 10:13 PM #83Originally Posted by singern
-
01-23-2007, 02:40 AM #84
ROFL singern could be shown a video of wolf blitzer and joe lieberman telling condoleeza rice her stance on the israel-hizbollah war and would respond with, "i could pull a video like that out of thin air to prove santa clause too" omgz that's so anti-semetic.
those tables and articles came from a number of sources, including a couple of jewish ones.
-
01-23-2007, 08:10 AM #85Originally Posted by J.S.N.
Show me substance, but dont post opinion and claim it to be written by god.Last edited by singern; 01-23-2007 at 08:13 AM.
-
01-23-2007, 08:12 AM #86Originally Posted by juicedOUTbrain
Yes I am, do you feel better......
Now please post something substantial that proves your statements,, or STFULast edited by singern; 01-23-2007 at 08:47 AM.
-
01-23-2007, 10:57 AM #87
Im not going to keep wasting my time...
All I said were most of our foreign policy was being written by pro-israeli groups, think tanks. I supplied you member lists from the webistes of these groups, links to their policy papers, and of Bushs cabinet (cross reference them yourself)..
I also said that Wolfowitz was president of the world bank...goto Worldbank.org and check it out for yourself...im done here...
If you actually took the time to watch the movie i linked, youd see that these things are not some "conspiracy", they are common knowledge and openly addmitted around DC.
but your obviously so frozen in your current mindset that you cant comprehend simple facts...
Show me that video, but dont post an article and claim it to be legitimate government intel.
Im done here...Last edited by juicedOUTbrain; 01-23-2007 at 11:19 AM.
-
01-23-2007, 08:56 PM #88Originally Posted by juicedOUTbrain
President Clinton couldnt get away with a blowjob without the entire nation up in arms, court time, investigations, and an impeachment.
Now you tell me the Government of the United states, the world bank and other national and world bodies are controlled by the State of israel, and nobody has anything to say about it, not one investigation or crisis.
So now you tell me that the Autobiographies, and tabloid like columns you posted are in some way meant to be taken at face value just because you and others who share your ideology chose to believe in them.
Sorry to burst your bubble.Last edited by singern; 01-23-2007 at 08:59 PM.
-
01-23-2007, 09:13 PM #89Originally Posted by singern
AIPAC is not the largest political action committee in the US? AIPACs agenda is not the current agenda of the US media? Off-shoot groups like MEMRI dont examine the media for "anti-Israeli" or "anti-semetic" comments?
PNAC and AEI didnt outline our foreign policy? There members aren't pro-israel? The policies wern't written in 1996 for Israel?
What exactly do you disagree with?
Not using this as evidence for or against what I claim...but, IF zionists, israelis, and pro-israeli PACs really did control the US gov't and, then wouldn't your question be self explanitory? Why would they investigate themselves?
Once again, I will ask you I prove any of the things that I've stated false...
not one investigation or crisisLast edited by juicedOUTbrain; 01-23-2007 at 09:43 PM.
-
01-23-2007, 09:19 PM #90
Quote: but, if zionists, israelis, and pro-israeli PACs really did control the US gov't and, then wouldn't your question be self explanatory? Why would they investigate themselves?
Dont you see that your own words inject a fantasy scenario
Even if Paul is pro Israel so What? Where is the evidence that he puts the good of Israel above all else?
Even If the US government is pro Israel so What, Where is the evidence that the government puts the interest of Israel above that of the US or anything else?
Hell, I am pro Chicago Bears, but that doesnt mean I will sell my children to go to a game.....Of course what you stated is all false, Just because you are anti Israel doesnt make any of this crap worth the time it takes to write it.Last edited by singern; 01-23-2007 at 09:31 PM.
-
01-23-2007, 09:53 PM #91Dont you see that your own words inject a fantasy scenario
Where is the evidence that he puts the good of Israel above all else?
Even If the US government is pro Israel so What, Where is the evidence that the government puts the interest of Israel above that of the US or anything else?
Just because you are anti Israel doesnt make any of this crap worth the time it takes to write it.
I am anti-israel (anti- zionist to be specific) because you spread an infectious level of misunderstanding, ignorance and hate, the same exact reason I hate extremists of all colors and religions. But I expect more from a western "civilized" country...
I am pro Chicago Bears
Once again, America's in the hole its in because of Israel, and our corrupt politicians! And The controlled media has allowed it to happen, by not being the watch dog that we rely on in a "democracy".
People like you who think that nothing is going on behind the scenes, and take everything your government says at face value, feed the beast...
Im not saying that all "conspiracy theories" are true, or that everything we're told is lies. But for gods sake, take what we KNOW and connect the dots:Last edited by juicedOUTbrain; 01-24-2007 at 12:09 AM.
-
01-24-2007, 07:32 AM #92
singern quit pushing for a parallel to the protocols of the learned elders of zion. any given lobby group, government, trade organization, bank, is driven by a number of forces. the issue is whether those forces are healthy for a) the united states, and b) the world community.
when we have the pharmalobby creating policy where we the taxpayers fund medical research, then the pharmacrop's patent the drugs and sell them without any controls, that does not benefit the taxpayer.
on the same token, if you have a pro-israel lobby pressing for american tax money subsidizing israel who then use it to effectively destabilize the middle east, we're pissing money away.
-
01-24-2007, 07:51 AM #93Originally Posted by J.S.N.
The FDA is run by the food and drug companies. Our energy policy was written by the big energy companies that got bush elected(Enron, Worldcom)Enviormental policy was influenced by the biggest corporate polluters, and our foreign policy papers were written by the israeli lobby and supported by big oil, big defense, and big reconstruction. Many other sectors supported it aswell because Iraq was "virgin territory" for capitalism.
If you dont believe this stuff than you dont know your history. Read up on the military-industrial complex, and war profiteering. These things aren't new but Iraq was definitly one of the bigger mistakes...
on the same token, if you have a pro-israel lobby pressing for american tax money subsidizing israel who then use it to effectively destabilize the middle east, we're pissing money awayLast edited by juicedOUTbrain; 01-24-2007 at 08:03 AM.
-
01-24-2007, 08:29 AM #94
yes completely. i can't wait until there's a robot slave world economy so we can get past this permanent antipathy/fleece the sheep system.
-
01-24-2007, 09:40 AM #95
Sorry gentlemen. You shot your own argument in the foot when you injected the hateful ignorance of "the elders of Zion" as a reference. Why didnt you just say Heil Hitler and be done with it.
Its like karma, True colors and intentions always come out in the end. Yours are now obvious to everyone.
Shalom.
Oh and by the way is anything we should know about you two (JSN, juicedOUTbrain) at "stormfront.org".Last edited by singern; 01-24-2007 at 11:24 AM.
-
01-24-2007, 06:55 PM #96Originally Posted by singern
I am half jewish, and reject your argument...my grandparents are russian jews and i have family in israel. My grandparents agree with me that the creation of the israeli state was not a great idea. Are you going to call them anti-semetic too?
i dont blame israel for everything, i just dont exlude them from being part of the problem as you do...
we can agree to disagree on that point, but please dont call me anti-semetic, or compare me to hitler...he was the most evil man to ever walk to earth, and he has much more in common with countries like the US and Israel (punishing the whole of a people, for the actions of a few) than people like me and JSN who are advocates for peace and understanding...Last edited by juicedOUTbrain; 01-24-2007 at 07:00 PM.
-
01-24-2007, 07:26 PM #97Originally Posted by juicedOUTbrain
Last edited by singern; 01-24-2007 at 07:42 PM.
-
01-24-2007, 08:31 PM #98Originally Posted by singern
Look at how mad you get after a civilian dies in a rocket attack. Your country has killed many times more palestinians in a country a 5th the size. Add this with the excessive poverty, lack of education, lack of human rights...
Are you that surprised that these people are ****ing angry and desperate? Is it that hard for you to understand that your defense actions are making things worse for you?
Bottom line, anyone who sees this injustice and speaks of it is not racist, or a terrorist, and i would appreciate if you left the name calling out of it...if you have a problem dispute my argument....Last edited by juicedOUTbrain; 01-24-2007 at 08:59 PM.
-
01-24-2007, 08:34 PM #99
-
01-24-2007, 11:01 PM #100
Anyway, back on topic...
Video: Wolf Blitzer at AIPAC conference gets the smackdown by Dr. Norman Finklestein
Blitzer got
Now watch the introduction "honest news broker" wolf gives to david duke...
Wolf Legitimizes David Dukes claim of zionist media
notice, even though thousands of people share this view, a former klansman is the only one to make it on the air...ask yourself why that is?Last edited by juicedOUTbrain; 01-24-2007 at 11:25 PM.
-
01-25-2007, 08:56 AM #101Originally Posted by juicedOUTbrain
And you say I’m angry?
-
01-25-2007, 10:18 AM #102Originally Posted by singern
Your making me extremly angry!...Ive asked you 5 times, and ill ask you 1 more time...What spefic claim do you have the most trouble believing? I will prove it...although i know no matter what i post wont be good enough...
Its so funny you just dismiss these things as conspiracy theory, they are FACTS! What the hell kinda shit is your press turning out over there...
Your own prime minister admitted that Israel controlled america!
-
01-25-2007, 10:38 AM #103Originally Posted by juicedOUTbrain
Dont get angry. My press is your press, I see the same cable news you do. I just dont take hearsay at face value. It also helps if you dont mix a predisposition to hatful propaganda with reality.
-
01-25-2007, 06:49 PM #104Originally Posted by singern
I never claimed there was a zionist conspiracy to control the ****ing world...I said that Israel is controlling america (through the media, and various PACS)...Your prime minister Aerial Sharon, has stated this fact on the Israeli radio station Kol Yisrael....although zionist media intimidation groups like CAMERA have denied this.
AIPAC is the biggest and most influencial lobby in the US-FACT
The Bush administration is dominated by Israel-Americans (AEI, PNAC, Hudson Institute)- FACT
The media in the US is monitered by MEMRI, CAMERA and the ADL-FACT
The Iraq war was "an imprantant Israeli Strategic Objective"-FACT
you would rather argue about words than the point I am obviously trying to make...
I claim you're a moron, and your own posts prove this...im done hereLast edited by juicedOUTbrain; 01-25-2007 at 07:10 PM.
-
01-26-2007, 07:00 AM #105Originally Posted by juicedOUTbrain
Fact = something that actually exists; reality; truth:
Opinion = a belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Gearheaded
12-30-2024, 06:57 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS