FDA: Gay men remain banned for life from donating blood

[kfrost06]

WASHINGTON - Gay men remain banned for life from donating blood, the government said Wednesday, leaving in place — for now — a 1983 prohibition meant to prevent the spread of HIV through transfusions.

The Food and Drug Administration reiterated its long-standing policy on its Web site Wednesday, more than a year after the Red Cross and two other blood groups criticized the policy as "medically and scientifically unwarranted."

"I am disappointed, I must confess," said Dr. Celso Bianco, executive vice president of America's Blood Centers, whose members provide nearly half the nation's blood supply.

Before giving blood, all men are asked if they have had sex, even once, with another man since 1977. Those who say they have are permanently banned from donating. The FDA said those men are at increased risk of infection by HIV that can be transmitted to others by blood transfusion.

In March 2006, the Red Cross, the international blood association AABB and America's Blood Centers proposed replacing the lifetime ban with a one-year deferral following male-to-male sexual contact. New and improved tests, which can detect HIV-positive donors within just 10 to 21 days of infection, make the lifetime ban unnecessary, the blood groups told the FDA.

In a document posted Wednesday, the FDA said it would change its policy if given data that show doing so wouldn't pose a "significant and preventable" risk to blood recipients.

"It is a way of saying, 'Whatever was presented to us was not sufficient to make us change our minds,'" Bianco said.

The FDA said HIV tests currently in use are highly accurate, but still cannot detect the virus 100 percent of the time. The estimated HIV risk from a unit of blood is currently about one per 2 million in the United States, according to the agency.

Critics of the exclusionary policy said it bars potential healthy donors, despite the increasing need for donated blood, and discriminates against gays. The FDA recognized the policy defers many healthy donors but rejected the suggestion it's discriminatory.

Anyone who's used intravenous drugs or been paid for sex also is permanently barred from donating blood.

[***xxx***]

wow, ban eveybody who had sex without a condom in their life too!

[spywizard]

why??

the HIV size

HIV virus particle

An article from "The Molecules of HIV" (c) Dan Stowell
www.mcld.co.uk/hiv
If you were to look at a HIV virus particle under a microscope, it would look something like this:



The size of the particle is around 0.0001mm

condoms will stop .. ????

a condom has never broken during sex for anyone right??

It's about risk management, use them and you will be better off than if you don't use them at all..

But they are not a guarentee.. nothing in life is..

[Carlos_E]

Do they ask if you traveled outside of the country or had unprotected sex while in a 3rd world country? I think that poses a higher risk than a guy who got a BJ back in '77.

[Lexed]

carlos lol did you get a bj in 77

[kfrost06]

It also excludes, "Anyone who's used intravenous drugs or been paid for sex also is permanently barred from donating blood." Oddly enough it does NOT ban someone thats paid for sex.

My main question is, how do they know? A questionaire I assume but is everyone honest on them?

[Carlos_E]

carlos lol did you get a bj in 77

Gross! I was 8 years old in '77.

[Carlos_E]

It also excludes, "Anyone who's used intravenous drugs or been paid for sex also is permanently barred from donating blood." Oddly enough it does NOT ban someone thats paid for sex.

My main question is, how do they know? A questionaire I assume but is everyone honest on them?

They should also ask wives if their husbands had extramarital affairs. That puts them at risk.

[Tock]

carlos lol did you get a bj in 77

I did and I liked it, too!