Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Flagg's Avatar
    Flagg is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Front toward enemy
    Posts
    6,265

    Nuclear powerplant on Mars by 2030

    I know the link to that report is old but I read about this recently in a Science Journal about the possibility of building a nuclear powerplant on Mars. Was pretty interesting I thought and could be mankinds salvation.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3162129.stm

  2. #2
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359
    Damn interesting engineering project

    But I dont understand why they would construct it on site. A small nuclear reactor small enough to be transported there in one piece could easily be built. Depends on the power they want from it though. But 10-100MWe should be plenty for a long time. They dont even need any containment structure on mars, just basic radiation shielding.

    At site the main problem would be cooling it, no water and very thin atmosphere so no easy place to dump excess heat. Maby they could use nitrogen from the atmosphere as cooling gas. But there isnt very much nitrogen in the air there. They would probably need radiators.

  3. #3
    mcpeepants's Avatar
    mcpeepants is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    822
    Where are they going to get fuel for the nuclear power plant? Is uranium and plutonium readily accessible on Mar's surface?

  4. #4
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359
    If they use fuel with high enrichment or of the reactor is a breeder the plant can run for 30-40 years without a refuling. So I assume they bring all the fuel needed with the reactor.

  5. #5
    RA's Avatar
    RA
    RA is offline Grade A Beef
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Getting madcow treatments
    Posts
    16,450
    Thats why they need ya...hurry up and get through school


    Quote Originally Posted by Kärnfysikern
    Damn interesting engineering project

    But I dont understand why they would construct it on site. A small nuclear reactor small enough to be transported there in one piece could easily be built. Depends on the power they want from it though. But 10-100MWe should be plenty for a long time. They dont even need any containment structure on mars, just basic radiation shielding.

    At site the main problem would be cooling it, no water and very thin atmosphere so no easy place to dump excess heat. Maby they could use nitrogen from the atmosphere as cooling gas. But there isnt very much nitrogen in the air there. They would probably need radiators.

  6. #6
    Kärnfysikern's Avatar
    Kärnfysikern is offline Retired: AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Scotty, beam me up
    Posts
    6,359
    Quote Originally Posted by roidattack
    Thats why they need ya...hurry up and get through school
    Only 8 months untill I have my masters but I doubt the russians are looking for swedish nuclear physcists and europe is to ***** to develop nuclear space applications

    So lets hope something opens up at NASA instead

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •