Thread: LMAO at Israeli Foreign Minister
-
01-16-2009, 12:33 PM #1
LMAO at Israeli Foreign Minister
This stupid **** is on the news now spouting and spouting. haha
They are asking her now about Isreal's war crimes for targeting and killing civilians and children. She is not liking the question as you can see it on her face.
"Israel is not only acting according to International law but to our values", "Israel made 90,000 calls to clear buildings of children" lol
Now they are pissed and spouting behind her "Turn the microphone off"...they just pulled the reporter away from the Microphone after asking this question.***No source checks!!!***
-
01-16-2009, 12:53 PM #2
War Crimes can only be commited by but non Western governments.. oh and not Israel apparantly.
-
She's a smug bitch, id love to see someone wipe the smile of her face..
-
01-16-2009, 05:49 PM #4
where is buffedguy to put his 10cents in on this....lol
-
01-16-2009, 06:19 PM #5
Apparently it was the wrong thing to do to question the Israeli war crimes. They took the reporter away from the icrophone and had alot of people circle him. There was one guy behind the Israeli **** who was screaming to turn the mic off etc...
haha***No source checks!!!***
-
-
01-16-2009, 06:42 PM #7
-
01-16-2009, 06:44 PM #8~ Vet~ I like Thai Girls
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Asia
- Posts
- 12,114
-
01-17-2009, 02:23 PM #9
shame on them now they know what they r into, they tried to exploit this moment of new administration taking in with as much bombing and killing as they can get before bush gets kiked out the office so they wont be a lot to answer anyways.
i saw how candy was cofused and anxious to vote in the un cause she couldn't get an answer from the head of the gang bush cause he was delivering a speach in the south.
i just don't understand why america has to bow down to this bastards orders, every time they commit a crime they have to bring down america with them.
-
-
01-17-2009, 03:27 PM #11
So true.. they are now about to agree to a cease fire, right when Bush is about to leave office. Coincidence? I think not.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/...aza/index.html
-
01-17-2009, 08:07 PM #12
-
01-17-2009, 08:46 PM #13
-
01-17-2009, 08:49 PM #14Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
very true
have a read of this!
http://www.davidicke.com/content/view/19027
-
01-17-2009, 09:03 PM #15
-
01-17-2009, 09:44 PM #16
I pray that the American media suffer severe punishment on the Day of Judgment for being accessories. I hope that their tongues burn for all the lies they spread. They NEVER show normal Palestinians, they NEVER allow Palestinians to be humanized. Whenever they show Palestinians, they show guys with guns. Yet when an Israeli soldier dies, they will interview the family, show a short bio of the deceased's life, and completely humanize the dead, even if the deceased was a soldier in the IDF (a terrorist organization). Free press in America? Yeah right. Most well-greased censorship program ever. They are the reason Israel gets away with what it does. They are 100% guilty. Makes my blood boil.
Last edited by BuffedGuy; 01-17-2009 at 09:46 PM.
-
01-17-2009, 09:50 PM #17
-
01-17-2009, 09:51 PM #18
-
01-17-2009, 09:54 PM #19
i think obama's foreign policy is ganna be worse cause he needs to prove to them that his not pro moslims or islam. especialy with the accusation his got on his shoulders u all now the story, and clinton his new foreign Mstr already mentioned in one of her hearings that this adminstration is ganna tough up with so called "terrorist" organisation like hamas.
so they already kind of claimed what side their on.
like i mentioned before in my previous posts i will never fall for no government ball/s.
welcome to new world baby back to god father gangs only this time they moved up the letter to play as governments.
cheers to everyone, you want to join fill out the application form at www.godfather.com
-
01-17-2009, 10:02 PM #20
Well, I don't agree with you that the media has a liberal bias. With regards to foreign policy, I think both Democrats and Republicans are the same. Very little difference. The two party system is a facade. It is a way of defining the terms of the debate. They decide what is allowed to be discussed and what is not. They have two parties so everyone thinks there is a liberal side and a conservative side.
It's unbelievable. They never ask the obvious questions. When Ron Paul said the most obvious thing in the world (i.e. that 9/11 was a direct result of the US's foreign policy), everyone in the room jumped on him, the media tried to humiliate him, etc. They try to define the debate. They give us two options so that we think *we* are deciding, even though the two are almost the same, and differ only by one degree.
If they opened up the debate to dissenting voices, you would find that most Americans would not vote for these two parties. If people heard what Ron Paul had to say, they would vote for him in a heartbeat. Most Americans are good people, and don't want war.
The media should open up the floor to different voices to speak. Let's hear what everyone has to say. Stop choosing for us who is allowed to speak and who is not. Put Hamas on the tv, put Usama bin Ladin on the tv, put Israeli settlers on tv, put Muslim moderates on the tv, put communists on tv, put Ron Paul on tv, put anarchists on tv, put the North Koreans on tv, etc....give EVERYONE a voice, engage people in open and honest debates, and then let the truth prevail whatever it is. Instead, we're always having the debate defined for us. I say: let everyone speak, then let the people decide for themselves what is the truth!
-
01-18-2009, 07:19 AM #21Member
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 380
what can be done so that the US news channels like CNN,FOX,and even msnbc would allow people like Noam Chomsky, or people that have those kinds of views like many academics in America .. those people should be allowed on those channels regularly to comment along with the neocons and democrats.. instead they only allow these very establishment democrats debate republicans .. and when they discuss something like the Israel/Palestine, then it's really a one sided joke with the 2 bastards basically agreeing with each other.. best book on the so called peace process is Noam Chomskys fateful triangle - that book is a must read, it really explains how the whole process is a sham going all the way bak to the 70's and 80's
some examples.. in 2000 up until now..the american media regularly 'reports' that Clinton and Barak offered Yasir Arafat a state at camp david and he rejected it.. they don't tell you that this 'state' was a very restrictive apartheid scheme and that Clinton was the one that ended the negotiations at camp david, and Barak terminated the follow up negotiations at taba a short while later..nor do they tell you that PA was willing to get back to those final status negotiations at any time since they were ended, and the Americans and Israelis refuse..
they tell you that Hamas is committed to Israels distruction, they don't tell you that Hamas has been offering for the last 8 years (at least) a permanent ceasefire if Israel withdraws from the occupied territories to the 1967 border, or that when Jimmy Carter held discussions with Hamas they aggreed to let Abbas hamer out a peace aggreement with Israel and then they would put it up to referendum for the Palestinians to vote for it, and they would respect the outcome of that.. they don't mention that Israel is committed to Palestine's destruction by trying toenclose the entire Palestinians population in disconnected bantustans that combined would be about 10% of the country-walled in.. they just keep talking about how Hamas wants to 'destroy' israel..
-
01-18-2009, 08:32 AM #22
Excellent post. Thank you.
They love to have strawman arguments. Never let the other side speak. When the other side speaks, the pro-Zionist paradigm is easily defeated and routed. We've seen it on this very forum, where pro-Israeli members have been left silenced without any arguments. If there is a free debate, we'll win. So that's why they can't allow it at any cost.Last edited by BuffedGuy; 01-18-2009 at 08:37 AM.
-
01-18-2009, 10:27 AM #23Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
-
01-18-2009, 02:23 PM #24
fvucking israelis...hope they pay for the war crimes they are commiting.
you gotta see their ambassors...whining about the demonstrations in Europe...fvck them!
cease fire...screw it i wouldn't accept it now, not after they occupied that land, killed innocent people on purpose for decades.
-
-
01-18-2009, 03:11 PM #26
Not just America, but the world needs someone like Ron Paul to save us from ourselves! Unfortunately it's been too indoctrinated in America now that you either vote Republican or Democrat. That's it. It's the same in the UK, people either vote Labour or Conservatives. I hate this ****ing system...it's not people choosing who they want anymore, it's people choosing who they DONT WANT in power. Liberal Democrats will never get a sniff, and some of Nick Cleggs policies are much better than what is currently on offer.
Oh well, I guess i'll just shut the **** up like a good robot, play my XBox, buy shit I don't need and comply with everything the government says is good for me.
-
-
01-18-2009, 04:40 PM #28
You are exactly right. If America was a one party system, then the masses would *know* they have no choice in the matter. By creating a two-party system, they give the *illusion* of choice. This is more dangerous! If we had a one party system like in some dictatorial countries, we would at least *know* how powerless we were. But we are fooled into thinking that *we* are the decision-makers, since we pick between two sides of the same coin.
The Western media and the politicians have been playing a game of the emperor wears no clothes. Nobody asks the *obvious* questions. After 9/11, it became taboo to ask WHY did that happen? WHY is Bin Ladin angry? Could it *possibly* be that--despite his extremist methodologies--there could be some iota of truth in his grievances? Could we just *entertain* the idea, or is that too much to ask for? WHY do we give billions of dollars in aid to Israel when we are in an economic disaster ourselves? WHY do we have military bases all over the world, placed in countries where the population does not want them there? WHY did we reject the Vichy government of Germany but ourselves set up Vichy-style governments the world over?
They have defined the parameters of the debate. They keep saying "Hamas rejects the right of Israel to exist." The OBVIOUS question is: WHY? And DOES ISRAEL REALLY HAVE THE RIGHT TO EXIST? Suddenly that question is taboo. Why is it taboo? Israel did not exist some sixty years ago. So what was the basis for its creation? Would we Americans have accepted such a thing if it happened to our lands?
All of these are obvious questions that do not take a brain surgeon to ask. It is the obvious thing to ask. If some random person came up to you and started yelling in your face, wouldn't the first thing you do is ask "hey, why are you yelling?"
These are all questions that are completely blocked out. Manufacturing consent.Last edited by BuffedGuy; 01-18-2009 at 04:43 PM.
-
01-18-2009, 10:01 PM #29
-
01-19-2009, 04:51 AM #30
-
-
01-19-2009, 07:44 AM #32Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
-
01-19-2009, 08:13 AM #33
-
01-19-2009, 03:08 PM #34
No israel will not be punished and never will with the America behind it every step of the way. World is not a fair place, Maybe when america is no longer a superpower which i don't think any of us wants.
-
01-19-2009, 06:11 PM #35
-
01-19-2009, 07:22 PM #36
-
01-19-2009, 07:56 PM #37
We can hope and pray that, Obama will do the right thing in all areas..
-
01-19-2009, 09:18 PM #38
the only thing i can predict at this time is that after his 1 month honey moon in the office there will b a lots of pressure on him and his adms i mean a lot.
-
01-19-2009, 09:32 PM #39
nope not even close, i just dont look at one side... the palistines are suppressed from first aid, h2o, food - but they can find things that make rockets??? and not just one but 200 avg a day some time as many as 450??? humm that doesnt make sence... cant find food but can find rockest... i have been around long enough to say that some thing is fishy there
as for the israels choices... man i dont get it??? cease fires, come and go ... oppressing the people... i dont get it
i guess i am sounding sympethetic to the jews ... i am not really sorry for that(i have not choice what happens to the jews or the pals)... i am just taking a diff look at the same thing you are... and what i see is a country that pissed of taking extream measures to eliminate what they see as a threat... that being said i am not condoning it, saying it is not one sided(the results are one sided cause israel is so much more powerful)
and all i hear is screw one of the sides not the other... i am hoping people look at the other side
-
01-19-2009, 09:35 PM #40
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
11-11-2024, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS