Thread: Ted Kennedey is a Ded Kennedey
-
08-26-2009, 11:47 PM #1Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- Exoneration. . .
- Posts
- 3,478
Ted Kennedey is a Ded Kennedey
Anyone even notice he's gone? Must have had SOME kind of honest, prodigal bone in his body.
-
I dont wish death on anyone, as I have said many times before. Hopefully the Socialist movement in this Country went with him, or at least has been slowed down.
-
08-27-2009, 12:42 AM #3Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- Exoneration. . .
- Posts
- 3,478
-
08-27-2009, 09:38 AM #4
Ded Kennedy sounds like the name of a Garbage Pail Kid.
-
08-27-2009, 05:29 PM #5
Can't say I'm sorry to hear the lady killing coward is dead.
-
-
08-27-2009, 10:32 PM #7
^^^waaaaa!!! Just because people don't subscribe to the conservative bullcrap that everyone who opposes them is a socialist doesn't make it so. Ted Kennedy has done much and he is a hero. And no I'm far from being a socialist. Anyone who supports bigotry, doesn't support equal rights, or anyone who supports government intervention in the private lives of citizens (opposition to homosexual marriage) are the real socialists.
-
08-27-2009, 10:54 PM #8
Regardless of his political viewpoints, he is a patriot, and its a shame that he's dead. While I did not agree with his policies, I respect him as a politician..
-
I agree with his civil rights, gay marriage and things like that. Seriously who doesnt, I dont agree with his LBJ style of the Great Society politics. Plus he killed is assistant, drunk, left the scene of the accident, left her to die, lied about it, got away with it because of his families legacy, hero he is not. Coward he was for leaving her and trying to cover it up. Dont care what else he did in life.
Last edited by MuscleScience; 08-28-2009 at 11:20 AM.
-
08-28-2009, 10:10 AM #10
-
I respect that he was the longest running senator.
But, coming from Mass originally, I can't say anything really positive about him.
The whole family's fortune is built on the alcohol prohibition that there father was into.
So, there is no love lost about his passing to me.
There is a laundry list of shit that goes on and on.
The more curious thing about the family is the name.
I saw an interview about this.
The Kennedy's don't even try to pretend where there $$$ came from.
I believe in free commerce.
But, The family could walk through a shit storm, they would get covered with shit.
And it all just went away because, in lue of the assassination of his brothers.
I'm not going to get into a debate about it with BgMc.
I respect you bro.
You know that by now.
It's just a personal thing I'm venting about.
-
08-30-2009, 05:54 PM #12
He was as human as either you or me, and advocated legislation that made it better for everyone. Here's a few highlights gleaned from his career; compared to the 8 years of George Bush's Presidency, I think the USA could stand another 47 years of Ted Kennedy over another 8 years of George Bush.
----------------------------------------------------------------
From Wikipedia - - -
1960's
-----------------------------------------------------
Kennedy returned to the Senate in January 1965, walking with a cane and employing a stronger and more effective legislative staff.[21] He took on President Lyndon B. Johnson and almost succeeded in amending the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to ban the poll tax,[21] gaining a reputation for legislative skill.[17] He was a leader in pushing through the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, which ended a quota system based upon national origin[17] and which, despite Kennedy's predictions at the time, would have a profound effect on the demographic makeup of the United States.[36] He also played a role in creation of the National Teachers Corps.[21][37]
1970's -- Kennedy became chair of the Senate subcommittee on health care and played a leading role with Jacob Javits in the creation and passage of the National Cancer Act of 1971.[
In 1973, Kennedy's son Edward Kennedy, Jr., was discovered to have chondrosarcoma; his leg was amputated and he underwent a long, difficult, experimental two-year drug treatment.[48][62] The case brought international attention both among doctors and in the general media,[62] as did the young Kennedy's return to the ski slopes half a year later.[63] His other son, Patrick J. Kennedy, was suffering from severe asthma attacks.[48] The pressure of the situation mounted on Joan Kennedy, who several times entered facilities for alcoholism and emotional strain and was arrested for drunk driving after a traffic accident.[48][64]
Meanwhile, Kennedy renewed his efforts for national health insurance. While proposing a single-payer solution favored by organized labor, he also negotiated with the Nixon administration on their preferred employer-based, HMO-oriented solution.[65] The two sides could not come to agreement, and Kennedy would later regret not seizing upon the Nixon plan.[66] In the wake of the Watergate scandal, Kennedy pushed campaign finance reform; he was a leading force behind passage of the Federal Election Campaign Act Amendments of 1974, which set contribution limits and established public financing for presidential elections.[67][68] In April 1974, Kennedy travelled to the Soviet Union, where he met with leader Leonid Brezhnev and advocated a full nuclear test ban as well as relaxed emigration, gave a speech at Moscow State University, met with Soviet dissidents, and secured an exit visa for famed cellist Mstislav Rostropovich.[69] Kennedy's Subcommittee on Refugees and Escapees continued to focus on Vietnam, especially after the Fall of Saigon in 1975.[52
1980's
Kennedy staged a tiring, dangerous, and high-profile trip to South Africa in January 1985.[102] He defied both the apartheid government's wishes and militant anti-white AZAPO demonstrators by spending a night in the Soweto home of Bishop Desmond Tutu and also visited Winnie Mandela, wife of imprisoned black leader Nelson Mandela.[78][102] Upon returning, Kennedy became a leader in the push for economic sanctions against South Africa; collaborating with Senator Lowell Weicker, he secured Senate passage, and the overriding of Reagan's veto, of the Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986.[102] Despite their many political differences, Kennedy and Reagan had a good personal relationship,[103] and with the administration's approval Kennedy traveled to the Soviet Union in 1986 to act as a go-between in arms control negotiations with reformist Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev.[78] The discussions were productive, and Kennedy also helped gain the release of a number of Soviet Jewish refuseniks, including Anatoly Shcharansky.[78][104]
Kennedy used his legislative skills to get passed the COBRA Act, which extended employer-based health benefits after leaving a job.[66][109] Following the 1986 congressional elections, the Democrats regained control of the Senate and Kennedy became chair of the Labor and Public Welfare Committee. By now Kennedy had become what colleague Joe Biden termed "the best strategist in the Senate," who always knew when best to move legislation.[78] Kennedy continued his close working relationship with ranking Republican Senator Orrin Hatch,[66] and they were close allies on many health-related measures.[110]
after prolonged negotiations during 1989 with Bush chief of staff John H. Sununu and Attorney General Richard Thornburgh to secure Bush's approval, he directed passage of the landmark Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.[66][118] Kennedy had personal interest in the bill due to his sister Rosemary's condition and his son's lost leg, and he considered its enactment one of the most important successes of his career.[66] In the late 1980s Kennedy and Hatch staged a prolonged battle against Senator Jesse Helms to provide funding to combat the AIDS epidemic and provide treatment for low-income people affected; this would culminate in passage of the Ryan White Care Act.[119]
1990's
the Civil Rights Act of 1991, which expanded employee rights in discrimination cases, came at the cost of being criticized for compromising with Republicans and Southern Democrats in order to gain passage.[123]
In 1996, Kennedy secured an increase in the minimum wage law, a favorite issue of his;[146] there would not be another increase for ten years. Following the failure of the Clinton health care plan, Kennedy went against his past strategy and sought incremental measures instead.[147] Kennedy worked with Republican Senator Nancy Kassebaum to create and pass the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act in 1996, which set new marks for portability of insurance and confidentiality of records.[66] The same year, Kennedy's Mental Health Parity Act forced insurance companies to treat mental health payments the same as others with respect to limits reached.[66] In 1997, Kennedy was the prime mover behind the State Children's Health Insurance Program,[148] which used increased tobacco taxes to fund the largest expansion of taxpayer-funded health insurance coverage for children in the U.S. since Medicaid began in the 1960s. Senator Hatch and First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton also played major roles in SCHIP passing.[
2000's
Kennedy was in his Senate offices meeting with First Lady Laura Bush when the September 11, 2001, attacks took place.[153] Two of the airplanes involved had taken off from Boston, and in the following weeks, Kennedy telephoned each of the 177 Massachusetts families who had lost members in the attacks.[153] He pushed through legislation that provided healthcare and grief counseling benefits for the families, and recommended the appointment of his former chief of staff Kenneth Feinberg as Special Master of the government's September 11th Victim Compensation Fund.[153] Kennedy maintained an ongoing bond with the Massachusetts 9/11 families in subsequent years.[153][158]
In reaction to the attacks, Kennedy was a supporter of the American-led 2001 overthrow of the Taliban government in Afghanistan. However, Kennedy strongly opposed the Iraq War from the start, and was one of 23 senators voting against the Iraq War Resolution in October 2002.[153] As the Iraqi insurgency grew in subsequent years, Kennedy pronounced that the conflict was "Bush's Vietnam."[153] In response to losses of Massachusetts service personnel to roadside bombs, Kennedy became vocal on the issue of Humvee vulnerability, and co-sponsored enacted 2005 legislation that sped up production and Army procurement of uparmored Humvees.[153]
-
-
08-30-2009, 06:37 PM #14
The people of Massachusetts had the responsibility and opportunity to judge his character and suitability for his job. After the Chappaquiddick situation, he asked the citizens of the state if he should quit or not. They said he should keep representing them, and they returned him to the US Senate several times after that.
So if you are not impressed with the representatives that the voters of Massachusetts send to the US Senate, your quarrell is with the voters, not with the elected officials.
That said, yes, I agree; they could have elected more sober representatives. But then again, they would not have had Ted Kennedy working for them.
-
08-30-2009, 06:51 PM #15
Prohibition?
Last I checked, everyone on this board is expending considerable effort to get around a type of prohibition.
Crazy and intrusive people started the alcohol prohibition. Smarter people lifted that amendment to the US Constitution so you and I could have a cold beer, away from the "Nanny State."
What good does it do to criminalize alcohol or steroids , or imprison bartenders and bodybuilders? Prohibition brought about bootleg liquor and underground labs, who both make sub-standard quality products. Bad booze could leave drinkers blind or dead, and bad AS can lead to infection, improper dosing, and bad advice on how to best use the product so as to avoid health consequenses.
Personally, I'd be happy to see someone start up a clean UGL that would provide customers with safe product, accurate labels, a safe and competant network of health professionals to provide the ancillary services that AS users ought to have.
Instead, hysterical politicians have given us Prohibition. What good is that?
-
-
08-30-2009, 08:37 PM #17
-
You read me wrong.
I said I was for free commerce.
Never said I was for prohibition.
You guys know my political stance on things.
I don't like Obama, Or Busch, or Clinton, ect....
I find that people here say things that they try to defend because they seem to hide from the truth.
I find it hard to believe that my AAS brothers are ruled by ignorance or such things.
If you liked Kennedy, then that's OK by me.
Your entitled to your opinion.
But, there are few men that are Senators,Republicans, or Democrats, that I respect.
It is what it is.
The whole Governmental backdrop is so polluted and convoluted, it makes me sick.
And I never voted for Kennedy...
PS-And anyone that is not for believing in the Constitution of the US, they need to go.They swear an oath to uphold the constitution to get in office, and then proceed to dismantle it.
Peace.
TitaniumLast edited by TITANIUM; 08-31-2009 at 10:28 AM.
-
-
08-31-2009, 03:15 PM #20
-
08-31-2009, 05:44 PM #21
Total scum-bag
Although I would have prefered he resigned a long time ago to death...I'm not sad he's dead.
-
09-01-2009, 03:27 AM #22
-
-
-
09-01-2009, 05:41 PM #25
-
-
09-01-2009, 09:52 PM #27
^^^you're right brotha. So I digress. I just don't understand how people could be so gullible and fall for such misinformation. It makes them sound ignorant. I don't mind if someone doesn't like a politician based on his politics, but when people form their opinions based on misinformation it makes them look foolish and sheepish.
-
-
09-02-2009, 02:28 AM #29
ok...well, i hope for your sake,you never need some specialty care that is classified outside of the governments defined scope of what they feel like treating.
So next time when you go into your ob/gyn's office for pelvic pain your government md is gonna just look at you and say "o not to worry...its just pelvic inflammatory disease". When all the while, had you been able to get a CT, MRI or biopsy immediately...you could have identified your ovarian cancer in a timely manner...you know...before it moved to your brain or other vital organ.
-
09-02-2009, 02:34 AM #30
The government couldn't even run a the best little whorehouse in texas
and for heaven's sake...if you can't sucessfully sell boo's and p ussy...what makes you think you can effectively manage healthcare
-
09-02-2009, 03:39 AM #31
-
09-02-2009, 03:42 AM #32
-
He does have a point here, I would have to agree with.
The governments advancements into the private sector of health care should be minimized, if not dismissed all together.
Now, this is not to say that the system does not need to be addressed, but to try to take away or even equalize privately paid for health care is wrong.
I know there is more to this subject than what everyone may or may not know, but you can see the problem on the horizon.
You can't make the system equal, so everyone gets the same as everyone else.
Most states have some kind of health care system in place for those who do not have health care at all.
Now, there could be numerous circumstances for this happening, but they would be to many to list.(job loss, income brackets,illegal immigrants, ect...)
So, the tax payers of the US are stuck with this ongoing problem of funding this with our taxes.
Now , I am not against doing this completely, due to the fact that, I may become one of those people in a similar situation and need health care I can't afford or ascertain.
But, I do have health care that I do pay for each week, and would rather not have it changed by federal legislation.
And the ramifications of this on the elderly are convoluted and not quite fully understood yet.
So, I think that if you have health care reform that takes away from some people to try to give to another, I feel that that is what the problem would end up as being the issue..
Health care is a business in the US, not a service, so to speak.
You can't really mix the two of them up together.Although the ideology of the thought sounds good and fair, making it work in harmony, I feel is unobtainable.
Best
TLast edited by TITANIUM; 09-02-2009 at 09:14 AM.
-
09-02-2009, 12:00 PM #34
While I understand what both are saying, you both fail to understand or see that Obama isn't trying to get rid of private insurance (although republicans would have you believe otherwise). He is merely offering a government option similar to that of the post office. FedEx and UPS are doing quite well. That is what I mean by the level of miscommunication that is being employed by politicians. Fear is the greatest political tool and I'll continue to say so. I saw exerts of one town hall meeting where an elderly woman stood up and said she was on medicare and then in the same sentence she said she didn't want the government interfering with her healthcare. I guess she doesn't understand that medicare is a government program.
Very few people want healthcare to be run totally and completely by the government. But the fact remains that our healthcare system, as its currently employed, WILL bankrupt us. It's needs to be overhauled. We spend more on healthcare than any other country in the world but are far from the best (37th in the world). All I ask is for people to make informed decisions. I admire your post T, you make valid points, but they are informed points, Bull Nuts posts are typical misinformed, republican spin.
-
09-02-2009, 12:11 PM #35
-
09-02-2009, 12:25 PM #36
I'll get you started BgMc
1. Our medical personnel cost vastly more than their counterparts abroad in almost every category. And nurses are still in shortage, and we need to import 25% of our doctors from abroad already.
2. American hospitals staff at very high levels. Doctors conduct an inordinate amount of tests. We use an expensive machine rather than watchful waiting. And often, those expensive machines catch conditions that never would have turned into anything, which we then treat.
3. We pay for procedures, not wellness...this is a huge problem because often we waste huge amounts of resources on people who are going to die anyway and the focus is not on preventitive care.
4. All medical decisions have to be made by a doctor because of medical regulations. Where often times a nurse would be good enough.
5. Doctors have their fees set by insurance companies and Medicare, so they can’t advertise low prices. Nor can they advertise higher prices but better service.
6.Bureaucratic medical billing. Each doctor has to hire people to submit his bills to the insurance companies, who have their own people who look for reasons to reject the claims. As someone on the inside of the cash for clunkers program, I can tell you the gvmt isn't going to change that. Most dealerships have only been paid on about 5% of deals so far and spent up to 1 day submitting just one claim.
7. Malpractice insurance. Many doctors have to pay more than $100,000/year for malpractice insurance. In fact many of the Neuro surgeons I knew personally had to pay up to 300k per year before they even did their first procedure.
8. Emergency medical treetment act. Often hospitals have to pass that on to paying customers. I know one hospital where they have a permanent resident that is too unhealthy to get discarged and has been there for 2 + years. They will have to eat that cost. The problem is not that medical care should be unavailible...but the law was made with no promise of compensation. Ie, you must take care of these people but we won't be paying you for it, you have to do it cause it's the law.
Care to explain where Obama's plan will have any impact on these costs or any other costs?
-
09-02-2009, 12:44 PM #37
-
Thanks
I try to learn what I can, and am always open to discussion.
I agree with the uninformed, or mis-represented information that people acquire from the media.
Fear is the biggest lever the government can pull, next to the electric chair.
Wars are won by mere intimidation alone.
Our government plays from the same deck of cards.
I'm not a republican, but believe in some of there values.
I'm not a democrat, but believe in democracy.
I like what some of what the liberals say, but it's the way they go about things.
I think I would categorize most of my views as conservative.
But, then again.....
So, I am registered as independent,
I consider myself to have core beliefs.
I'm pro constitutional for sure.
Best
T
-
OK, I'm now going to "tap out", and watch this post.
BgMc and Kratos are up up bat now.
I'm at the point where I have to read and research what is being said.
And I will.
I respect both of you, and what you are saying.
I'll chime in later, when I see what gets posted.
Like I said before, this forum is both entertaining and educational.
Just remember to keep it clean.
We after all are setting in example for others.
Best
T
-
09-03-2009, 10:02 AM #40
1. Information sharing is burden on the US healthcare system. Streamlining the process would be cost effective. This has been proposed by Obama. A more efficient system could save as much as 360 billion.
2. The underinsured and no insurance people are a drain on the system. These people tend to shy away from preventative care and end up in emergency rooms with ailments anywhere from minor headaches to major illness. These emergency room visits are 10 times more costly than normal doctor visits and the average tax payer ends up paying the enormouse expenses. Insuring more people and emphasizing preventative care (which Obama has proposed) will lead to lower costs.
3. Unnecessary care. Because of the pay per service system currently employed, a whopping 500-700billion (according to the AARP) annually is spent on unnecessary services. A reform of this type program is necessary. A happy medium can be found.
Seems I didn't read your last post, Kratos. My apologies, but we see the same problems and the three I listed do have reform measures in Obama's plan. Whether or not other bills proposed by the Congressional Dems and Republicans include these reforms, I'm not quite sure.Last edited by BgMc31; 09-03-2009 at 10:06 AM.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
11-11-2024, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS