-
01-22-2013, 01:40 AM #1
Time to kiss your 1st amendment rights goodbye
Isnt this lovely. Not that I haven't been saying it was going to happen sooner than later but I really was hoping I was wrong.
http://youtu.be/O9d80FsWuEQ
-
01-22-2013, 09:37 AM #2
didnt. have time to listen to all....at work shhhh....but is it just protest hes bannin or freedom of speech in general
-
01-22-2013, 10:16 AM #3
i see u made a separate thread as well i saw u posted this link in flagg's 4th amendment thread as well....
totally RIDICULOUS! but nothing surprises me anymore....SCARY!
-
01-22-2013, 11:07 AM #4Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
- Location
- US
- Posts
- 1,225
Incredible. I did NOT see this, hear about this.
I've been around a while and this is the kind of stuff that liberals back in the day would be OUTRAGED about. This is the kind of stuff that liberals accuse conservatives of. But its ok if they do it. New liberals are very close minded peeps.
-
01-22-2013, 11:07 AM #5Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
- Location
- US
- Posts
- 1,225
BTW...thanks for posting, LB. I stopped watching politics on TV the night of the election last year.
-
01-22-2013, 09:57 PM #6
H.R.347
One Hundred Twelfth Congress
of the
United States of America
AT THE SECOND SESSION
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the third day of January, two thousand and twelve
An Act
To correct and simplify the drafting of section 1752 (relating to restricted buildings or grounds) of title 18, United States Code.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011’.
SEC. 2. RESTRICTED BUILDING OR GROUNDS.
Section 1752 of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
-‘Sec. 1752. Restricted building or grounds
‘(a) Whoever--
‘(1) knowingly enters or remains in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do so;
‘(2) knowingly, and with intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, engages in disorderly or disruptive conduct in, or within such proximity to, any restricted building or grounds when, or so that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions;
‘(3) knowingly, and with the intent to impede or disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, obstructs or impedes ingress or egress to or from any restricted building or grounds; or
‘(4) knowingly engages in any act of physical violence against any person or property in any restricted building or grounds;
or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
‘(b) The punishment for a violation of subsection (a) is--
‘(1) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both, if--
‘(A) the person, during and in relation to the offense, uses or carries a deadly or dangerous weapon or firearm; or
‘(B) the offense results in significant bodily injury as defined by section 2118(e)(3); and
‘(2) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both, in any other case.
‘(c) In this section--
‘(1) the term ‘restricted buildings or grounds’ means any posted, cordoned off, or otherwise restricted area--
‘(A) of the White House or its grounds, or the Vice President’s official residence or its grounds;
‘(B) of a building or grounds where the President or other person protected by the Secret Service is or will be temporarily visiting; or
‘(C) of a building or grounds so restricted in conjunction with an event designated as a special event of national significance; and
‘(2) the term ‘other person protected by the Secret Service’ means any person whom the United States Secret Service is authorized to protect under section 3056 of this title or by Presidential memorandum, when such person has not declined such protection.’.
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vice President of the United States and
President of the Senate.If people can't tell your on steroids then your doing them wrong
-
01-22-2013, 09:57 PM #7
Not exactly like stated in the video.
If people can't tell your on steroids then your doing them wrong
-
01-27-2013, 11:50 AM #8Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Location
- usa
- Posts
- 109
This is a joke. I hate this country im moving to mexico lol.
-
02-15-2013, 08:11 AM #9"ARs Pork Eating Crusader"
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- A world without islam!!!!
- Posts
- 7,092
Freedom of speech is overrated. We have no bill of rights in australia and were awsome. We can still preety much do what we want. To many rights make people think they can do anything they want. Westpro baptist church would not exsict in australia the people would not let it happen. Protesting a soldiers funeral in australia would get you killed and so it should but you americans allow this crazy stuff to happen. Freedom is good but to much is just as bad as not enough. Australia has just the right amount.
Last edited by Euroholic; 02-15-2013 at 08:14 AM.
-
08-25-2013, 06:41 PM #10Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2013
- Location
- Here
- Posts
- 99
This bill is aimed at individuals who "can't follow diirections", physically interfere with gov't functions and then cry that they have the right to free speech. It is not aimed at peaceful protesters. As long as you don't physically get in their way they won't bother you. It's meant for the aholes who abuse their rights/priveledges.
-
08-25-2013, 07:05 PM #11Banned for repping Dangerous Substances
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
- Location
- Micanopy/Gainesville, Fl
- Posts
- 5,868
-
08-25-2013, 07:25 PM #12Banned for repping Dangerous Substances
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
- Location
- Micanopy/Gainesville, Fl
- Posts
- 5,868
I am just besides myself with that video. Can this be real and how. There must be something missing here. crazy mike
-
08-25-2013, 07:42 PM #13
The Constitution means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to our President. This guy is a disgrace to our country.
-
08-25-2013, 09:24 PM #14Banned for repping Dangerous Substances
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
- Location
- Micanopy/Gainesville, Fl
- Posts
- 5,868
They are working on taking our guns and now our freedom of speech? My question is what can an individual do. A group of more people. Who and where and how. Do we wait until the next election. Do you wait. I'm kinda fuked, I'm a felon and can't vote. So everyone talks and watches and so... I mean really wtf. ...crazy mike
-
08-26-2013, 05:30 AM #15
They've been slowly taking our guns away little by little since Clinton was in office. Mid terms elections come around next year and people need to vote. The problem is that the average person lives in a balloon and has no idea what the hell is truly going on. They see Obama as a Celebrity and think he's a "cool guy" so they vote for him and all his cronies. I will never vote for a Democrat again prob. for as long as I live after this Socialist in office.
-
09-17-2013, 01:46 PM #16New Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2013
- Posts
- 41
Wow. Its time for revolution
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
11-11-2024, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS