-
10-21-2005, 08:42 AM #41
And I have an other idea.
Check some of your vials.
The red logo is always behind the paper label?
'Cause in Norma factory a machine stick the labels, and the red logo is always on different places (sometimes the label cover the logo, but sometimes not!)
And check the stampings. (lot number and exp date). It is always on the same place?
-
10-21-2005, 08:45 AM #42Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Norway
- Posts
- 105
Originally Posted by MichaelCC
-
10-21-2005, 09:22 AM #43Originally Posted by Seajackal
Maybe PAC is this "magical faker" who produce so perfect looking fakes. Sorry PAC it was just a joke
I think faker start to educate himself. But I still beleive it can be real one. Judge_dread will helps us for sure. Logo and Exp Btch# positions is not so important for me, because all lebels are made by machines, and they just do their job, not watching if logo and label is at the right positions.
When i was younger, I visited one pharmaceutical factory with the school, and I saw how they are produced. About 200-500 000 pills and about 5-10 000 ampules every minute. Therefore I hope little differences in position can happend, even if amp with logo on the glass came a little bit turned to label machine.
Also I remember Bionabol from Bulgaria, which were packed by 40 tablets in glass bottle. in some glass there was 39 pills and in another there was 42 pills. This was becasue of old packing machines, which were not counting the pills, but they were packing tablets by weight of glass+pills. If there came to machine a glass which were lighter than another, than machine put more pills in glass to fulfill total weight. Therefore i think, small details changes can happend in original factory too - even if it's producing milions of pills and amps every day. Therefore the label-paper quality, used characters font and ampul tops are much important for me.
I'm, little bit confused of this stamped Batch# and Exp date, but if Judge dread find out, that NORMA changed this thing a little bit this year, there will be no reason to tell it's fake. that's my opinion.
-
10-21-2005, 02:55 PM #44New Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 8
hey
hey Pac
these look good to me mate.
the way to check is peal off the label on the bottle the Norma under the label in blue or red should be ingraved into the bottle and not rub off or peal off in anyway NORMA HELLAS S.A is engraved into it see pic in red(newer) or Blue (older) sorry about the pic quality taken from a book not prepared to rip a label off mine!
steds4
-
10-21-2005, 04:37 PM #45Associate Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 249
Originally Posted by steds4
.......Last edited by Seajackal; 12-10-2005 at 05:52 AM.
-
10-21-2005, 05:58 PM #46Junior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- eastern Europe
- Posts
- 99
I believe Judge Dread has the final word (or the pic)...
-
10-23-2005, 02:34 PM #47New Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 1
Last edited by Seajackal; 12-10-2005 at 05:53 AM.
-
10-23-2005, 09:37 PM #48Originally Posted by Celsius.nl
and I didn't know that 2005 were coming witht the bar codes in the stickers
BTW if you see the labels that will be the final words to say that Pac's
Normas are fake, they haven't changed the fonts...
-
10-29-2005, 07:03 AM #49Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 512
agree
i agree with seajackal, these are very very good counterfeits. The E is a problem. We had simular counterfeits and had them tested. I will show only parts of pictures because it will appear in a bb-magazine soon.
On the comp[arison you'll see that this fake had a "good E' with the bottemline longet then the upper two. They use that same E in the white part of the label, the real ones don't.
Real as wel as fakes come in a box wrapped per ten and in a box of 300.
Last month the price for Norma went up from 2.55 to 2.58 euro
-
10-29-2005, 07:09 AM #50Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 512
deviations
The watermark doesn't light up and has no watermark. The logo is blurry and it contains an other steriodal content then nandrolone , my guess is Test prop, but we haven't analysed the real content (yet).
what i want to say is: the Norma counterfeits are olmost perfet to perfect, only minor deviations give it away and still then only analyses makes it a 100% fake or counterfeit
-
10-29-2005, 07:14 AM #51Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 512
fakes
Three different contents...
-
10-29-2005, 08:49 AM #52
Just one question, if you don't mind, Dutch, what about the numbers "3" and "4" are
the fonts in the batch/exp date always the same, I mean closed 4s and not rounded
3s in the real ones? I have mine with fonts like that, so if we see any other good
fakes we can have an idea by this also! Thanks for the inputs Dutchm now I think it's
time for PAC to get his money back. Now guys are you satisfied with my doubts on
PAC's decas?
-
10-29-2005, 10:37 AM #53Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 512
Originally Posted by Seajackal
-
10-29-2005, 05:40 PM #54
I was mentioning about the batch in the Normas, not Organons, Dutch, sorry man
my bad.
-
10-29-2005, 10:54 PM #55
Thanks for all the info DutchBB.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
11-11-2024, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS