both good or not???

[Booz]

Are these both legit,one of these were posted in an earlier thread by someone i know who got them from the same source,the others were aquired direct from thai by a friend of mine on a recent trip!!notice one has thetrademark shering stamp and the other dosent,also the diff in thickness of the blue line,the LOT MFD EXP dates are all set out diff.also thye vials testoviron depot is more bold,and the mfd and exp dates are diff??there are three years diffr in the manufactor dates could this be why they are so diff??

[Booz]

the vials on the left my friend bought back from thai with him,the right was fromm a source in thai!!the ones on the left look def better in my eyes!!

[Xtralarg]

They are both good IMO,just different dates of manufacture therefore slight changes to packaging can only be expected,I have used the 05' gear with that packaging with excellent results,I dont think you have anything to worry about.

[Booz]

They are both good IMO,just different dates of manufacture therefore slight changes to packaging can only be expected,I have used the 05' gear with that packaging with excellent results,I dont think you have anything to worry about.

thanks mate!

[SVTMuscle*]

mmmmm Test E @500mg/week for 20 weeks?

[Seajackal]

If you take a look at the manufacturing date they are differents one made in
2002 and the other 2005 but both look fine for me I'm just concerned about
the Schering logo missed in the newer one...

[Kale]

I have a box of the one on the right here in front of me. It is identical to your pics. I know they are good because I have used three boxes of them in the past.

[Booz]

thanks lads most appreciated,i was just a tad concerned about the lack of the logo on one of them!