Thread: Ronnie Vs. Arnold
-
09-09-2006, 05:57 PM #1National Level Bodybuilder
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 1,588
-
09-09-2006, 06:50 PM #2Junior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 138
As said before on this site and others Ronnie has the super freek look compared to Arnolds more "natural" appearance. Comparing the 2 is like comparing lineman of the 60 and today. Today we have better drugs, training, supplements and knowledge. Neat photo.
-
If i was a judge still have to give it up to arnold. His body goes together so well. Don't get me wrong ronnie is jacked but doesn't look as well put together as arnold.
Less is more
-
09-09-2006, 07:05 PM #4National Level Bodybuilder
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 1,588
Originally Posted by DSM4Life
-
Originally Posted by MrMent1on
-
09-09-2006, 07:56 PM #6National Level Bodybuilder
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 1,588
well unfortunately Arnold wouldnt finish in the top 15 in todays Olympia, sad but true.
-
09-09-2006, 09:02 PM #7Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- Massachusetts
- Posts
- 7,379
Sure Ronnie has bigger legs than Arnold, but he also has alot bigger gut and waist line.
Arnold FTW. The only guy that comes close to Arnolds presentation, will be Phil Heath once he brings his chest up
-
09-09-2006, 10:34 PM #8Junior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 50
'73 Olympia, Arnold at his biggest...I think this is him later on, when he didn't even try as hard....
-
09-11-2006, 09:16 AM #9
when i look at ronnie's body,i just cant relate to it.the proportions are ridiculas.most body builders these days are just mass monsters and have no asthetics.your mind tells you its just not right!
-
09-11-2006, 09:21 AM #10Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- Massachusetts
- Posts
- 7,379
Originally Posted by helium3
-
09-12-2006, 01:55 PM #11New Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- NYC
- Posts
- 49
The only things that look bigger are ronnies gut and legs!
-
09-12-2006, 02:52 PM #12Originally Posted by MrMent1on
Arnold also didnt have acess to the type of gear ronnie runs
-
09-13-2006, 12:15 AM #13
Arnold without a doubt
-
09-13-2006, 01:12 AM #14
Ronnie looks like the concrete block before you carve into it. Arnold looks like the carved out finshed product. Both the best in their ERA, just like Ruth-Bonds, Chamberlain-Shaq, etc.....
-
09-13-2006, 11:15 PM #15Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2006
- Posts
- 1,054
Originally Posted by SVTMuscle
-
09-13-2006, 11:26 PM #16
ronnie looks more fake then arnold does
-
09-13-2006, 11:29 PM #17
From what I understand of the cycles Arnold was taking in his day, it would be something relative to a first timers cycler, or half of it, if that....
~M.A.D.
-
09-14-2006, 09:29 AM #18Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Florida
- Posts
- 121
Originally Posted by MrMent1on
-
09-14-2006, 09:43 AM #19
I like Arnolds look much better, but you cannot compare the two w/ that pic. Arnold looks just as big as Ronnie in the pic minus the waistline and legs, which we all know is not true. Arnolds arms were not as big as Ronnies, and they look bigger in the pic, it's 2 different pics taken from different angles and distances photoshopped to look the same, or comparable. Legs or no legs, pretty big ****ing difference b/ Arnolds size and weight and Ronnies. And for the record, Scwharzenegger was never 240 on stage, I have a friend who witnessed his Olympmia prep personally, and saw him get on the scale during a bet between Ken Waller, the bet was for $50, that Arnold didnt weigh more than 220. He got on the scale and quickly got off it.
-
09-14-2006, 09:55 AM #20Originally Posted by sooners04
-
09-14-2006, 06:18 PM #21Originally Posted by MrMent1on
-
09-14-2006, 06:42 PM #22
Ronnie Vs. Arnold for u who think ronnie is better then arnold in any way ur out of ur mind
first off u all say if arnold was competing in ronnies day he might be better theres no doubt he would be a beast
but if u put ronnie back in arnolds day he would have no chance on stage
-
09-20-2006, 07:27 PM #23Associate Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 318
arnie looks better, even though ronnie is bigger
-
09-20-2006, 07:34 PM #24
Ron looks like he's pregnant.
-
09-20-2006, 07:35 PM #25
But, those are the best abs i've seen on a pregnant chick yet!
-
09-20-2006, 08:20 PM #26
I got news for all of you guys, if Arnold competed today looking like he did at his best, I doubt he even place top 20 in the Nationals.
-
09-20-2006, 08:35 PM #27
thanks for that breaking news
-
09-21-2006, 11:01 AM #28
Arnold Where's Your Legs?
-
09-21-2006, 11:03 AM #29Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- Massachusetts
- Posts
- 7,379
Originally Posted by Hellmask
-
09-21-2006, 12:12 PM #30
agreed
-
09-22-2006, 12:33 AM #31
arnold didnt have access to gear like ronnie does
-
09-24-2006, 05:21 PM #32
i've never seen a body compare to arnolds. perfect symmetry. ronnie is great, no doubt, but too bulky. arnold still has that "natural" feel to his body.
-
09-26-2006, 09:38 AM #33Originally Posted by Hellmask
-
09-27-2006, 12:24 AM #34Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 1,266
Originally Posted by Undecided09
Very true, they did not have the technology we have today or the better understanding of synthetic hormones. You could say a first timer but I think some of the doses I hear about are or should be for an all timer...
50mg of prop and 15-30-50mg of dbol ed. 2-3 weeks on 2-3 weeks off, 250mg sos 1-2 Ewk and GH late 70's early 80's... (not read, hear say from an old school personal trainer that has past on RIP)
I still wonder what Arnie ate as a teen... you can not dismis the genetics of the two, which I think is also a factor
Still no one will have a chest like Arnold... no one will ever have that frame and hold his mass that way... It also might be because no one eats, trains and uses the same amount and type of hormones too and has that frame, and has that frame, and has, j/k,,, felt like I said this some where before but like five times...
two different eras, as some one said before.
-
09-27-2006, 12:24 AM #35Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 1,266
Originally Posted by Undecided09
Very true, they did not have the technology we have today or the better understanding of synthetic hormones. You could say a first timer but I think some of the doses I hear about are or should be for an all timer...
50mg of prop and 15-30-50mg of dbol ed. 2-3 weeks on 2-3 weeks off, 250mg sos 1-2 Ewk and GH late 70's early 80's... (not read, hear say from an old school personal trainer that has past on RIP)
I still wonder what Arnie ate as a teen... you can not dismis the genetics of the two, which I think is also a factor
Still no one will have a chest like Arnold... no one will ever have that frame and hold his mass that way... It also might be because no one eats, trains and uses the same amount and type of hormones too and has that frame, and has that frame, and has, j/k,,, felt like I said this some where before but like five times...
two different eras, as some one said before.
-
09-27-2006, 04:26 AM #36
Yep, Arnie's chest was best!
-
09-29-2006, 10:06 PM #37
Arnie all the way!!
-
09-29-2006, 11:19 PM #38
I think overall ronnie is bigger, his thighs are 2X the size of Arnolds. Arms arent too different. All in all ronnie is bigger but Arnold has a better physique than ronnie. Arnold has a longer leaner chest and torso. I dont know thats like comparing Bruce Li to Jet Li, 2 DIFFERENT eras.
-
09-30-2006, 02:33 AM #39
arnold looks like a greek god. ronnie looks disgusting.
-
09-30-2006, 12:24 PM #40Originally Posted by stayinstacked
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Dutasteride increase during test...
Today, 01:57 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS