Mr Olympia

**BeatofEvolution** · 01-04-2005, 07:17 PM

take your 37" waist and get some weight loss pills....size means nothing there are powerlifters with 25" arms and they are ****...arnold had thick and full bicep heads...ronnie's are smaller and uglier...just a mass of tricep...picture is not photoshoped...look at the original

**FCECC2** · 01-04-2005, 07:27 PM

Originally Posted by BeatofEvolution

take your 37" waist and get some weight loss pills....size means nothing there are powerlifters with 25" arms and they are ****...arnold had thick and full bicep heads...ronnie's are smaller and uglier...just a mass of tricep...picture is not photoshoped...look at the original

bahahahah, are you jealous that i still got a taper with a 37" waist???

get a life newb, did you ever chk pics of ronnie other than those in this thread??? LOL...

**FCECC2** · 01-04-2005, 07:32 PM

he smokes lil arny anytime!!!

**Sage** · 01-04-2005, 07:44 PM

Originally Posted by TRLS63

he smokes lil arny anytime!!!

keep in mind that arnold was not running the compounds and amounts what ron does today............arnold would own him without a doubt...............

**FCECC2** · 01-04-2005, 08:07 PM

Originally Posted by Sage

keep in mind that arnold was not running the compounds and amounts what ron does today............arnold would own him without a doubt...............

yeah maybe...
arnold is still one of the greatest, theres no doubt about it

**apostalpaul2003** · 01-04-2005, 08:39 PM

Originally Posted by BeatofEvolution

umm arnolds legs were not photoshopped .. look at the original picture...and his arms are much better than ronnie's, ronnie's are not symmetrical, he isn't symmetrical he is just a 300lb slab of striated unproportioned meat...if ruhl had triceps he'd be better...if cutler had a better back he'd own ronnie if dexter was 15lbs heavier of lean muscle he'd be better...i love ronnie cuz of his sick lifting and his size but as far as aesthetics and bodybuilding he is ****t

Since you cant see it I circled it for you..see for yourself

**BeatofEvolution** · 01-05-2005, 12:26 PM

??? Take a look at the mass of his upper body...its amazing...i think its much better than colemans...

**BeatofEvolution** · 01-05-2005, 12:26 PM

i've seen better tapers on terds and haircuts boss ....

and i was teasing u about the 37" cuz i think that avatar is funny with your mullett u sick bastard

**nsa** · 01-05-2005, 01:27 PM

Its simple, the pictures are different proportions. Coleman is bigger than arnold everywhere in reality. Look at the size of the faces in the picture, arnolds face alone is the size of ronnies face and the top of his head...

**Latimus** · 01-06-2005, 12:49 AM

ya but thats 22 inches of beautiful peak....not 24 inches of gross

**nsa** · 01-06-2005, 06:42 AM

I think dorian yates looks better than both...

**apostalpaul2003** · 01-06-2005, 03:26 PM

Yeah you cant beat Yates

**BeatofEvolution** · 01-08-2005, 01:08 PM

ewww dorian yates never deserved his olympias...he's blockier then markus ruhl and has the biceps of female bodybuilders...he was very dense and thick, but never worthy of an olympia...nassar and flex had better physiques for the mass in my opinion

**apostalpaul2003** · 01-08-2005, 03:06 PM

Originally Posted by BeatofEvolution

and has the biceps of female bodybuilders

Are you serious are just kidding?

**apostalpaul2003** · 01-08-2005, 03:07 PM

**KGBnine** · 01-08-2005, 05:42 PM

personally, I prefer the look of the old bodybuilders. Most people I talk to would def. take arnold's physique over ronnies, but it's just opinion. Why anybody would think ronnie with his GH belly looks good is beyond me. 1% bodyfat on a person still does not look good if their organs are that large.