Lowering Cholesterol Without Statins

[JohnnyBreeze]

There is absolutley zero benefit to eating fiber, it is simply indigestable plant material. Cooked fiber robs the blood and intestines of available fats and causes dryness, irritability and usually lethargy. You can read all fancy studies but when you look at indeginous cultures that eat diets of only meat and dairy without any fiber, they don't get cancer and live long happy lives.

Wow, I'm not sure how to even proceed based on your responses. This is science and facts that have been proven over and over again by observation. Do you even know what fiber is? Yes it is plant matter, but there is soluble fiber and insoluble. Both are very beneficial. Soluble fiber enters the bloodstream and to put it in simple terms, one of the things it does is "clear out" the "bad cholesterol". It does this by binding to bile acids and prevents them from being absorbed into your system. Bile acids are made of cholesterol (among other things), so when there is less bile acid being absorbed, your cholesterol in your bloodstream goes down because your liver uses it to produce more bile acids. More soluble fiber and the cycle repeats.

Whether fiber is cooked or not has no impact on what it does. Yes insoluble fiber can adsorb (not absorb) fats rendering them indigestible, but that is not necessarily a bad thing unless you take a lot of fiber and your fish oil or flax oil at the same time. We're not talking about adsorbing grams and grams of fat, if that were the case then when low fat diets were all the rage in the 80's and 90's, nobody would have been without a ton of psyllium. When you say it robs the intestine of fats, it's more like it takes a few coins out of the "Help A Child In Africa" donation jar at the gas station. Also, insoluble fiber helps clear toxins from the colon by adsorbing them as well, that's one of the way it helps digestion and helps prevent colon and other types of cancers.

Please state the names of cultures that only eat meat and dairy what area they are indigenous to. I will show you that there are plants they are consuming in their diet which are providing fiber.

The toxins are stored in the fat of an animal, they are not transferred into the milk which would harm the infant. Butter and cheese are made from milk.

Again, I'm just at a loss here. If fats are not transferred into milk of mammals fro the mammals themselves, then how do they get there? For example, in cows, while some of the fat is synthesized by the mammary glands the rest is from "lipolysis of adipose tissue". So, during lipolysis of existing fat tissue, toxins can be released and end up in the milk, and yes if there are enough toxins they can harm the infant.

You know just enough to not know what it is you're talking about, which is dangerous. I really would like to know what you base these incorrect assumptions off of, but if I'm trying inform and have a conversation with a person who doesn't respect science and facts, I'm done.