-
02-01-2007, 10:25 PM #1
can we really say hydroxycut hardcore is safer than clen?
i ask about this fat-burner in particular cause it's the only one i found on the market that worked as good as clen for fat-loss while maintaining lean muscle. however, though i know there's concerns that clen may cause cell death, can we really say hydroxycut hardcore is safer? i mean, how much research has been put into all it's ingredients that wasn't paid for by the company itself? i want to find a safe alternative to clen, but just wondering if you guys really think it's been tested thoroughly enough to say it's unquestionably safer?
-
02-02-2007, 12:08 AM #2
You found success with hydroxycut hardcore? Im interested in an OTC fat burner than I can cycle with an ephedra based fat burner. Stimerx I believe I am choosing as my ephedra based burner later on....but I didnt know that hydroxycut was found to work.
-
02-02-2007, 12:14 AM #3Originally Posted by ascendant
*If anyone on this site has a lab and proper equipment/knowlege to conduct this test have at it!!!!*
-
02-03-2007, 11:05 AM #4Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Florida
- Posts
- 665
the same goes with every supplement we put into our body.
-
02-04-2007, 10:32 PM #5Originally Posted by CoreyTampa09
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Need PCT advice after becoming a...
10-03-2024, 05:33 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS