Results 1 to 22 of 22
  1. #1
    gimpsgtp is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    53

    Whats more efficient for calorie burning?

    I was having a debate with a friend and we were discussing what is more effecient for burning calories, swimming in a pool or running on a treadmill. same amount of time for each. not talking about muscle gains or anything else just whats more effecient for calorie burning, i was saying running because in the pool your body temp is lowered, and i always thought that a higher body temp will help to burn calories.
    thanks
    Nick

  2. #2
    taiboxa's Avatar
    taiboxa is offline "Vanity Redefined" ~VET~
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    lol im not telling :D
    Posts
    29,198
    swimming is tuff for Me

  3. #3
    gimpsgtp is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    53
    anyone else?

  4. #4
    novastepp's Avatar
    novastepp is offline Have You Picked a Fight Lately?
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    in a dilapidated apt.
    Posts
    14,924
    i'm looking for an article i have that relates running : swimming : and biking...
    i'll post it when i find it

  5. #5
    taiboxa's Avatar
    taiboxa is offline "Vanity Redefined" ~VET~
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    lol im not telling :D
    Posts
    29,198
    Quote Originally Posted by novastepp
    i'm looking for an article i have that relates running : swimming : and biking...
    i'll post it when i find it
    thnx

  6. #6
    n4529359's Avatar
    n4529359 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    169
    running definitely uses more energy than swimming

  7. #7
    gimpsgtp is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    53
    thanks let me know when u find that article

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Staten Island/Tampa
    Posts
    1,014
    I believe Swimming is the much better calorie burner and overall better cardio. Water serves as resitence, which makes you work every muscle in your body.

  9. #9
    damiongage's Avatar
    damiongage is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Pergatory
    Posts
    3,432
    I do not know about calories...but for burning fat it is to hard to keep yourself at the proper level consistantly.

  10. #10
    naz-uk is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    241
    well surely its purely dependant on your working level and if working at exactly the same level in both (dont know how you would work that out) i would go with swimming because there are more muscles involved, requiring more blood, more oxygen, more heart beats etc = more energy expenditure.

  11. #11
    sooners04's Avatar
    sooners04 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,521
    I would say swimming would be WAY tougher to do for an equal amount of time on a treadmill. Try swimming for 30 min then talk.

  12. #12
    naz-uk is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    241
    its not very fair to look at it on the toughness of the activity when swimming is involved because the major problem with most people is that they have terrible technique which then reflects on the work load, where if u compared it to running most people arent half bad (compared to swimming technique at least)

  13. #13
    WHOADY4SHOADY's Avatar
    WHOADY4SHOADY is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    The Chocolate City
    Posts
    1,114
    Quote Originally Posted by naz-uk
    its not very fair to look at it on the toughness of the activity when swimming is involved because the major problem with most people is that they have terrible technique which then reflects on the work load, where if u compared it to running most people arent half bad (compared to swimming technique at least)
    Good point, but some may like swimming better because of non impact on joints.

  14. #14
    primetime1's Avatar
    primetime1 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Only In Jersey
    Posts
    569
    some good points here. , nova you find that article yet?
    im curious as to see the effectivness of each myself.

  15. #15
    gimpsgtp is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    53
    well alot of replies no definite answers haha, thanks though, we will just have to wait for that article

  16. #16
    DNoMac's Avatar
    DNoMac is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,684
    I've heard that swimming isnt as efficient because your body doens't have to try as hard to keep your temperature cool because the water will keep you cool. Not sure how much of a difference that makes in overall calorie expenditure

  17. #17
    S.P.G's Avatar
    S.P.G is offline AR Workout Scientist
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    uk/ south east
    Posts
    4,535
    Swimming burns calories at a rate of about 3 calories a mile per pound of bodyweight. If you weigh 150 lbs. and it takes you 30 minutes to swim one mile (1,760 yards or 1,600 meters), then you will be using about 900 calories in one hour. However, many swimmers do not swim that quickly, and many cannot swim for that distance or duration.

    Many people feel extremely hungry after training in the pool, and may simply replace all the calories they've burned with a large post-exercise meal.

    So as many people observe that they feel like 'eating a horse' after they have finished a swiming session, and may overcompensate for the energy they have just burned...
    Last edited by S.P.G; 03-06-2006 at 05:51 AM.

  18. #18
    novastepp's Avatar
    novastepp is offline Have You Picked a Fight Lately?
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    in a dilapidated apt.
    Posts
    14,924
    I found the conversion but it's not all i remembered it as..

    100yds swimming=1.5 miles of biking=.25 miles of running...

    so i'm guessing since swimming is the smallest comparable distance, that it burns the most calories in that comparable distance.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    N.Ireland, UK
    Posts
    746
    swim 100yrds and uv actually swam 1.5 miles? im a bit confused! lol

  20. #20
    rastling1 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    91
    He is saying swim 100 yards and its like biking 1.5 miles or running .25 miles. Same workload

  21. #21
    novastepp's Avatar
    novastepp is offline Have You Picked a Fight Lately?
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    in a dilapidated apt.
    Posts
    14,924
    yeah in terms of calories burned for distance traveled...the distances equal for the different training methods...

  22. #22
    naz-uk is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    241
    i think there are too many variables for the question to be anwsered accurately imo

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •