Results 81 to 120 of 232
-
09-26-2004, 05:58 PM #81Originally Posted by ChiTownTommy
Bringing this up a THIRD TIME. You already ADMITTED the steroids were yours didnt you?????
If that is the case, you really have no leverage. Maybe if you are from a small town, the DA might be laid back (they never are) and give you a break.
Dont worry about your account on here. They arent gonna take the time or care to read what you post on a message board.
-
09-26-2004, 06:56 PM #82AR-Hall of Famer / Retired
- Join Date
- Aug 2001
- Location
- Wherever necessary
- Posts
- 7,846
This is a lot of crap - worst they can do to you is 0-6 months - most likely looking at probation and some class of misdemeanor if you plea - make them prove it and yes, dont let a pub defender sell you cheap because he wants to plea your case ASAP
-
09-26-2004, 08:10 PM #83Originally Posted by Psychotron
-
09-26-2004, 08:14 PM #84Originally Posted by bermich
-
09-26-2004, 09:56 PM #85
I don't know who your lawyer is but I have a friend who got busted with dbols and like a half ounce of weed (in NY) while he was stoned and only got probation with drug tests. The only thing you had that he didnt was the drug paraphanalia and I don't think that makes too much of a difference. I'd have to agree with whoever said the worst part is going to be this hitting your pockets, lawyers are expensive (the reason im studying to be one). Finally, if for whatever reason they do try and hit u with the book or your lawyer sucks or watever get those felony charges off you. Felony convictions will lose you your student loans and all that good **** which will really **** up your money situation. Good luck
-
09-26-2004, 10:01 PM #86Originally Posted by mushroomstampr
-
09-26-2004, 11:21 PM #87
I'll throw in my 2 cents... I'm currently in law school, specializing in criminal law.
I didnt read through all the posts, so excuse me if I ask questions that have already been answered.
What kind of lawyer do you have? Under no circumstance should you let the public defender represent you. Here is my advice... call lawyers from the capital city of the state you live in. Lawyers are well worth the money... it could be the difference between court time... and sentence reduction. Its very possibly and likely that you can have one of the charges dropped... with a good lawyer.
Here is what you must understand about college living conditions. You're wrong with you say that "they can search your room if they have reason to believe they need to". Colleges dont have their own special laws.
Under the 4rd Amend. you're protected from anybody searching your room without a search warrent. You said that they told you they had a search warrent.. did they? This is very important... if they didnt have a search warrent this case will be dropped. I can promise you that. It doesnt matter what they have reason to believe... you're paying for that room and you have an expectation of privacy. Anything that you expect privacy, needs a warrent (briefcases, office desk at work, rooms, glove boxes in cars, safes...)
Do whatever you gotta do.... get money from the parents, take out a loan..... get a good lawyer. Dont get one from the county you live in... I repeat, dont get one from the county you live in.
If you have any questions... feel free to PM me bro.
-
09-26-2004, 11:22 PM #88Originally Posted by mushroomstampr
-
09-26-2004, 11:28 PM #89Originally Posted by EastCoaster
-
09-26-2004, 11:34 PM #90Originally Posted by ChiTownTommy
Bro... Your college cant voilate your fourth amendment rights. If you're paying room & board and you have a lock on the door... then that room is yours. I dont care what they have in fine print... it wont stand in court. You cant violate the civil liberties given by the constitution. They MUST have a warrent... but you let them in on your own will, which was a mistake. I strongly urge you to get another lawyer, this guy is going to wrap this case up as quickly as he possibly can... after court, you can find your lawyer having lunch with the judge and prosecutor while you're in jail.
When it comes to lawyers, you get what you pay for.
-
09-26-2004, 11:39 PM #91Originally Posted by EastCoaster
-
09-26-2004, 11:47 PM #92Originally Posted by ChiTownTommy
If it doesnt have a lock, then its free to search.
As you probably now know... you should never have let them come into your room. To give you an example why they couldnt come in to your room like your college said in fine print.... When they knocked on the door... they asked you to step outside... why? Because they cant walk in, and they knew that. If they were able to walk in, then they would have.... but they didnt... once they had you outside and drilled you with questions, they ASKED you if they could search your room.... and inknowingly, you said yes.
-
09-26-2004, 11:50 PM #93Originally Posted by EastCoaster
-
09-26-2004, 11:51 PM #94Originally Posted by ChiTownTommy
Technically.... no, he cant.
-
09-26-2004, 11:53 PM #95
Being that in that instance nothing was found, I dont think it would hold much importance. Unless you tried to claim that he was intimidating you, or possibly violating your privacy. Thats a stretch though.
-
09-27-2004, 04:57 AM #96
Just bumping for ya. Any dates on when you go to trial or before a judge? Hope it works out for ya.
Peace man.
max
-
09-27-2004, 05:35 AM #97Originally Posted by ChiTownTommy
-
09-27-2004, 05:49 AM #98Originally Posted by mass junkie
-
09-27-2004, 05:51 AM #99Originally Posted by EastCoaster
thats VERY true! i know plenty of people that has fallen for that.. lesson well learned
-
09-27-2004, 06:48 AM #100AR Hall of Fame
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Posts
- 25,737
Why on earth did you ever open the door at 2 a.m.???
I'd have continued w/lights out, and if no-one is there, they can't BREAK IN!!!!!
They'll have to come by the next day, in which case you could have flushed/gotten rid of all your stuff.
Sh*t, if anyone knocks on my door past 9 p.m., they get the ghost-town treatment!
Best wishes!
~SC~
-
09-27-2004, 08:07 AM #101Originally Posted by hung-solo
-
09-27-2004, 08:08 AM #102Originally Posted by SwoleCat
-
09-27-2004, 08:11 AM #103Originally Posted by ChiTownTommy
-
09-27-2004, 09:02 AM #104Originally Posted by MMA
Like I said before.... the golden rule.... If it has a lock, it needs a warrent.Last edited by EastCoaster; 09-27-2004 at 09:05 AM.
-
09-27-2004, 09:05 AM #105Originally Posted by EastCoaster
-
09-27-2004, 09:06 AM #106
Lifes a learning experience
-
09-27-2004, 09:12 AM #107
sorry bro good luck
-
09-27-2004, 09:58 AM #108
just heard form the lawyer he said he has my court date moved to october 14th, so i have to sweat it out for a couple of weeks
-
09-27-2004, 08:36 PM #109Originally Posted by ChiTownTommy
-
09-27-2004, 10:40 PM #110
Ive been readin this for a few days now, the thing that jumped out at me and has probably been posted before, is that if the cops did not have a bonafide warrent i.e. the actual paper in thier hands when they knocked on the door, you could have and should have told them to **** off. Without a warrent, they cant do jack schidt. Then, like swole said, you could have hidden all your contraban in some one elses room till it blew over.
-
09-27-2004, 11:40 PM #111
drug parifonialia (sp) ... needles in your state are illegal???
I saw all misdemanor charges... except for the controlled substance. No trafficing charges.
Your lawyer should be able to talk the controlled substance charge down.
And a question... I didnt think Nolva and clomid were illegal?
-
09-27-2004, 11:45 PM #112Originally Posted by MMA
OK, lets just say that the school can set their own stipulations to searchs. No matter what their code is, they must have established probable cause to even justify such an attempt. When they searched this kids room, I dont see their probable cause. They knocked on his door because they "heard" he was selling fake ID's, hersay is not probable cause unless its coming from an informent... which I'm highly doubting it did in this instance.
If I were this kids lawyer, I would tear this schools officials inside out.
For starters.... you could argue that when he was asked to come outside, he was informally put under arrest. Technically, you're officially under arrest "when you feel that you cannot leave". These officers pulled this kid outside, then when he asked to put some clothes on, the officer put his foot in the door to watch him... in my mind, this kid is undoubtly under the watch and arrest of the officers at this time, UNLESS they said, "you're not under arrest, we just want to ask you a few questions." They have to be very clear about this. Without reading this kid his miranda rights, I dont see how you can justify his consent to search as reasonable. The whole incident was flawed with horrible procedure from the start.
I have no doubt that I would be able to have ALL charges dropped if I were representing this guy.
This kid was informally put under arrest without probable cause... under no circumstances can this be justified. I would tear this case apart.
-
09-28-2004, 12:01 AM #113
eastcoaster... If I need you, your coming to MT for vacation...
right?
-
09-28-2004, 12:19 AM #114
Actually. Colleges CAN MAKE UP THEIR OWN RULES. Those rules are as good as law. You sign papers in admittance of that college saying you obey the rules set fourth by the college. You are NOT ALLOWED to do many things in dorms. Burning inscents for example can cause you to get kicked out of the dorm. The dorm BELONGS to the school. Just because it is being paid for does not mean the student can do as he wishes. The dorm is ON SCHOOL PROPERTY. Some schools dont allow co ed fratinizing inside dorms past a certain hour. Sooooo.....
As far as the searching thing goes, I dont know. Depends on the contract he signed when he enrolled. Im sure schools vary with what they can get away with.
From what I read from the above posts: He ADMITTED to posess the drugs. The cops said they had a search warrant so he let them search. They found the drugs.
ALL of this would be dismissed if he kept quiet like ALL THESE THREADS SAY TO DO.
A good lawyer could get him off. But is there such a thing without paying 20k?????
-
09-28-2004, 12:55 AM #115Originally Posted by bermich
You're right, a college can make their own rules, but they cant voilate your civil liberties. Let me go back to what I said before, "if it has a lock, it needs a warrent", I dont care who's property its on.
EXAMPLE
The police can come to your office while you're not at work and ask your employer to search your belongings.... which he will because its his property right? Yes, and No. They can search the top of the desk and around the desk, but if that desk is locked, they cannot under any circumstance open it without a warrent.
ANOTHER EXAMPLE
The police go to a high school with drug sniffing dogs. They let the dogs run down the halls till they find a locker they like. The Principal, who is in charge of the school, lets the police do this. Once they find a locker that the dogs are barking at, they CANNOT open it without a warrent. (though a warrent wont be hard to get because you now have probable cause). The police will go and get this kid out of class and ask him to open up his locker, and 99.9% of the time, the student will.
Its like I stated before, in the orginial case we're talking about... I dont see clear probable cause to stop and question this guy. I feel that they placed him under arrest, as he felt he didnt have the option to go back in his room.
I'm still in law school and I have a lot to learn yet.... but this case is extremely flawed.
-
09-28-2004, 12:59 AM #116Originally Posted by bigol'legs
I'm not exactly sure where MT is but if I'm Bar accepted in that state I'd be more than happy to represent anybody in need.
-
09-28-2004, 02:31 AM #117Originally Posted by EastCoaster
Are you sure that is correct? I always thought that highschool lockers belonged to the school and the kids were allowed to use them under guidelines. I thought the school can do locker checks ANYTIME for any reason.
Please check on this instead of thinking it is correct. This has my attention.
-
09-28-2004, 08:04 AM #118Originally Posted by MMA
I will look this up.....
Originally Posted by bermich
Read below for your answer....Last edited by EastCoaster; 09-28-2004 at 08:53 AM.
-
09-28-2004, 08:51 AM #119
I must tip my hat to you MMA. You're right.
This is what I've come up with based on reading: New Yersey vs T.L.O, State vs Hunter, and Moore v. Student Affairs Comm of Troy State Univ.
A high school setting and college setting are similuar but a little different, we'll start with the high school setting first.
In a high school setting, the doctrine of in loco parentis is in effect, which means, school adminstrators are a substitute parent while students are in school. BUT students still have to have a reasonable expection of privacy. The courts say that probable cause is not even necessary to a search, only reasonable suspicion. Which I think is hardly a reasonable exception of privacy, because the teachers can possibly "plot" or set up the students. I dont agree with this at all. (but I'm nobody)
College gets a little more tricky. Yes, they can make their own rules and regulations for searches without warrents, but they must have clear probable cause! In Moore v Student Addairs Comm. of Troy State Univ, the courts established that "the right of privacy protected by the fourth amendment does not include freedom from reasonable inspection of a school-operated dormitory room by school officials." The problem with this is, whats reasonable? Thats up for the courts to decide.
Hope this helps answer everybodys questions. Thanks MMA, I stand corrected... I'm glad I learned something new.Last edited by EastCoaster; 09-28-2004 at 08:55 AM.
-
09-28-2004, 12:30 PM #120
i didnt read anything after the first couple of post but a good friend of mine was busted with a pcs(lorcets) which i believe is the same charge you have and he also got a POM(weed) and a Possesion of a dangerous drug. He got into some **** and he has a verry strict probation which is called like an outpatient program with hair test and meeting with a judge twice a week and classes like 4 days a week. Thought it might make you feel a little better to hear that? I know how it is being in trouble with the law and in and out of court
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Expired dbol (blue hearts)
01-11-2025, 04:00 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS