Results 81 to 96 of 96
Thread: Checkout the Apple iPhone
-
01-11-2007, 06:51 PM #81Originally Posted by elvisinturn1Muscle Asylum Project Athlete
-
01-11-2007, 07:02 PM #82Originally Posted by Carlos_E
The phone itself does have an HSDPA compatible radio on it. It's just waiting for PTCRB cert. on the HSDPA over UMTS schemes. Once the firmware is CTIA complaint, you can just download the firmwareware "patch."
-
01-11-2007, 07:11 PM #83
i read on some stock site that they are secretly planning on releasing this phone on jan 15 after their big macworld show stirs up a big hype about it. any truth to this?
-
Originally Posted by Carlos_E
I bet he dont know the truth.
-
01-11-2007, 07:25 PM #85Originally Posted by Sepsis
http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsS...licKey=2727138
-
01-11-2007, 08:03 PM #86Originally Posted by manwithin
The second show of the new year he recommended Apple as a stock to buy for 2007 because they were going to unleash the newest phone. In the same episode he also recommended Cisco and said that they had the rights to iPhone though.
This is all meaningless to the original thread, but in the past month I have become very interested in investing.
-
01-11-2007, 10:25 PM #87Originally Posted by elvisinturn1
?Muscle Asylum Project Athlete
-
01-11-2007, 10:45 PM #88Originally Posted by Carlos_Eabstrack@protonmail.com
-
01-11-2007, 10:52 PM #89Originally Posted by GsxxrMuscle Asylum Project Athlete
-
01-11-2007, 11:00 PM #90Originally Posted by Carlos_E
-
01-11-2007, 11:52 PM #91Originally Posted by Carlos_E
-
01-12-2007, 06:15 AM #92Originally Posted by elvisinturn1Muscle Asylum Project Athlete
-
01-12-2007, 08:21 AM #93
I saw during Steve Job's presentation of this new iPhone, Apple stock rose $7. Plus, he ordered 4000 lattes for all those who attended. Rich bastard...
-
01-12-2007, 12:53 PM #94
An article on Canoe Network helps flesh out the conflict between Cisco and Apple over the dispute between the iPhone name and the suit Cisco has filed against Apple claiming it violated one of its trademarks.
In the suit, filed Wednesday, Cisco asked a judge to forbid Apple from using the name "iPhone", which Cisco has held as a trademark since 2000.
According to the article, Apple initially inquired after Cisco to acquire or license the rights to the iPhone name. Upon refusal of these names, Cisco claims that Apple embardked on a campaign of "confusion, mistake and deception" and created a shell company called Ocean Telecom Services LLC to sidestep these challenges.
In an application submitted to the U.S. Patent and Trade office during March of 2006, Ocean Telecom described itself as a foreign company offering services in Trinidad and Tobago.
As of Thursday, an Apple spokeswoman declined to comment on Ocean Telecom,
In spite of criticism form both sides, Apple recently calling Cisco's lawsuit as "silly", Cisco spokesman John Noh claimed that Cisco was still willing to negotiate with Apple with regard to the name. Noh claimed that Cisco executives would like to let Apple use the term "iPhone" on the condition that the companies' phones be able to communicate with each other.
Of course the do! They know Apple is going to sell millions of these things, and Cisco wants a piece of the pie!Muscle Asylum Project Athlete
-
01-12-2007, 03:40 PM #95Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 93
This phons is sweet. I just wish I had 600 big ones to put into it.
-
01-12-2007, 09:09 PM #96Originally Posted by SVTMuscleOriginally Posted by STYLE74Originally Posted by firmechicano831Originally Posted by aadrenaline
It looks like Verizon Wireless is following in Sprint's SMS footsteps, announcing a planned hike in text messaging rates for those not currently subscribed to a messaging package. The hike, which will take effect March 1st, will bump the cost of sending a text message to the U.S., Puerto Rico, Canada and Mexico from $0.10 to $0.15 per message, with the price for international text messages remaining at $0.25 per message. The cost of receiving a message from customers of foreign wireless carriers, however, will increase to $0.15 whether you subscribe to a messaging package or not. If this all sounds a little familiar, it's because when Sprint did the same thing late last year, it didn't take long for people to figure out that the rate hikes amounted to a so-called "material change" to their contracts, meaning they could bail on it without paying an Early Termination Fee (EFT). So if you've been sticking to Verizon but secretly fancying another carrier, this looks like it may be your only chance to take the plunge without also taking a hit.Muscle Asylum Project Athlete
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS