Thread: Suspension/Banning
-
04-16-2008, 12:46 PM #1
Suspension/Banning
Can we start suspending or banning people who blatantly talk about shipping methods? Seems like just making it a rule isnt working!
-
04-16-2008, 01:02 PM #2
If you see it, report it. Well get a handle on em.
By the way, your avy makes me hot.
-
04-16-2008, 01:02 PM #3
that is a great idea........maybe give them one warning, and then you can ban them when they ask the same question like two threads later..... there would be people getting banned and kicked off like every ten min.......still a very good idea....
-
04-16-2008, 01:16 PM #4
hahaa ya, even if it wasnt a rule it should be COMMON sense ya know. it really pisses me off
-
04-16-2008, 02:00 PM #5
there is a petition to make no discussing shipping methods part of the rules, if you look in the Q&A you'll find it
-
04-16-2008, 03:06 PM #6
It's a shame that people don't follow it.
AGThere are 3 loves in my life: my wife, my English mastiffs, and my weightlifting....Man, my wife gets really pissed when I get the 3 confused...
A minimum of 100 posts and 45 days membership required for source checks. Source checks are performed at my discretion.
-
04-16-2008, 03:24 PM #7There are 3 loves in my life: my wife, my English mastiffs, and my weightlifting....Man, my wife gets really pissed when I get the 3 confused...
A minimum of 100 posts and 45 days membership required for source checks. Source checks are performed at my discretion.
-
no matter what you do some newb will say it.
-
04-16-2008, 10:16 PM #9
i agree with you guys on this, but in a previous post my comments were getting quoted from like 3-16 and this rule was posted on 3-18 by lego. i know you know what i am talking about AG, so just be sure you're not beating up guys like me in old posts and stuff.
it hurts.....
also i think you really need to clarify the difference between "shipping methods", and a container such as a vial or amp. you know what i mean? i just never considered "those things" a method. i just considered them a container. i just wanted to clarify my points from earlier. and i said in that thread it should be deleted and it was, i respect that and it was definitely the right move, and i am 100% on board with you guys. peace.
-
04-17-2008, 05:38 AM #10
-
04-17-2008, 06:43 AM #11
My comments weren't directed at you, lex57. The post that we are discussing/referring to says shipping and packaging methods. A vial or an amp wouldn't be considered taboo because pharm grade comes in those containers. "Other" shipping/packaging methods that aren't standard pharm grade packaging wouldn't be discussed on the open board.
I'm sure you understand the and reasoning and logic behind the decision to not discuss "unconventional" packaging.
AG
Petition to ban all post about shipping methods, or advice on how to recieve
9. Categorically no discussion of Recreational Drugs of any kind for any reason.
10. There is NO discussion of any type of packaging/shipping methods or ordering info that labs are using. Questions will be kept to PM's for members who have 100posts and 45days activity on the board. Please do not ask how websites pack as we will not give this information out and your request will be unanswered.
Last edited by almostgone; 04-17-2008 at 06:49 AM.
There are 3 loves in my life: my wife, my English mastiffs, and my weightlifting....Man, my wife gets really pissed when I get the 3 confused...
A minimum of 100 posts and 45 days membership required for source checks. Source checks are performed at my discretion.
-
04-17-2008, 07:00 AM #12
...and if I grabbed one of your posts that was made prior to the proposed rule, I apologize. This ban on talking about non conventional packaging is something that I feel is very important to our "community" and I've been trying (like many others) to get everyone on board with it. With all of the questionable posts that there have been, I must have failed to notice the date of your post.....my bad.
AG
There are 3 loves in my life: my wife, my English mastiffs, and my weightlifting....Man, my wife gets really pissed when I get the 3 confused...
A minimum of 100 posts and 45 days membership required for source checks. Source checks are performed at my discretion.
-
04-17-2008, 07:09 AM #13
-
04-17-2008, 08:13 AM #14
-
04-17-2008, 08:53 AM #15
Is this rule to keep the feds from getting wise about how stuff is shipped? I've said it before but in these times I would not get stuff thru the mail but..............
-
04-17-2008, 12:53 PM #16
my ugl stuffs my gear up a persons ass and mails me the whole body, the feds actually dont mind the body as much as the gear...LOL4real i think people should get no fvckn warnings on it and get kicked off...
-
04-17-2008, 02:17 PM #17
Lol ^^
-
-
This is how i send my gear. So far the FBI hasn't caught on.
-
04-17-2008, 04:26 PM #20
Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Posts
- 3,435
^^Dude, that's how i receive my gear!!!
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Front Loading Before a 2 wks...
06-21-2024, 05:12 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS