hrt vs. pct

**TUnit** · 10-09-2007, 03:20 PM

I am on hrt and currently in the middle of a cycle of test and var, when I finish I will then cruise back to my hrt dose. Is it easier or do you have a better chance of keeping your strength and weight gains from a cycle when going back to your hrt dose as opposed to doing pct and getting your natty test levels back?

**magic32** · 10-09-2007, 04:27 PM

The problem here is that you're suggesting hrt is somehow superior to natty, when in actuality they'd be the same, if the hypoganadal diagnosis is valid and the hrt dosage is accurate.

The reason for this is that hrt is designed to restore otherwise deficient levels, hence it would be the natty equivalent in a person with normal test. So for you, natty production is below normal levels, whereas hrt is merely normal. Thus, pct and natty would be a poor choice for those on therapeutic dosages.

**hugovsilva** · 10-09-2007, 06:58 PM

Originally Posted by magic32

The problem here is that you're suggesting hrt is somehow superior to natty, when in actuality they'd be the same, if the hypoganadal diagnosis is valid and the hrt dosage is accurate.

The reason for this is that hrt is designed to restore otherwise deficient levels, hence it would be the natty equivalent in a person with normal test. So for you, natty production is below normal levels, whereas hrt is merely normal. Thus, pct and natty would be a poor choice for those on therapeutic dosages.

Completely agree. If you are on hrt i suppose your test levels are below normal, so even with pct you would still be under the normal values. On hrt you have normal test levels in your system, so between those two its obvious hrt is preferable. By the way, how old are you?