Thread: Cycle at 22
-
04-13-2012, 01:33 AM #81
Where is the pics !!!
-
04-13-2012, 01:59 AM #82Junior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Posts
- 121
-
04-13-2012, 05:07 AM #83
ok ok enough already...
POST A PICTURE, age aside lets see if you are ready
-
04-13-2012, 05:43 AM #84
His original question: I know many of you will not support some undeveloped young adult running a cycle but i plan to, here is my question, say I am undeveloped and am going to **** up my hormones, which is more likely to do it. A light cycle of test or a light oral only of t-bol. would the t-bol be less likely to screw my hormoes because it dose not aromatise? or would the test be better?. If no one gives me an answer i will be taking the t-bol only at 50mg ed for 5 weeks with a clomid pct of 100/50/50/50
I know oral onlys are frowned apon but at my age wouldn't a turnabolin only be a better option then getting shut down hard by test ?
Thx! all opinions welcome, and all respect to tho's that may disagree with young aas!
Last edited by cherryking; Yesterday at 05:43 PM.
-
04-13-2012, 05:47 AM #85
And his other post:T-bol Only V.s Test Base
Haven't really bin able to find the answers i have bin looking for, Which would be better. "Better" as in healthier on endorice system at a young and undeveloped age, say 18, because that would be insanity, but legal. A good beginner cycle Test E or A cycle of just T-bol. I know traditionally an oral only is a very disrespected cycle , but what about for someone with an undeveloped body, would the t-bol be healthier because T-Bol doesn't aromatize? Or would the Test base still trump.
Dose aromatization matter? I know no matter what any steroid before the age of 21-25 would be very harmful, but that aside, wouldn't a test base shut the kid down harder then just an oral ?
Thx all opinions welcome!
-
04-13-2012, 05:48 AM #86
-
04-13-2012, 05:56 AM #87
^^^ Wouldnt surprise me at all
-
04-13-2012, 05:57 AM #88
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Scamming my brothers
- Posts
- 11,286
- Blog Entries
- 2
God this thread is aweful and 7 mins of my life i'll never get back.........
-
04-14-2012, 05:45 PM #89Associate Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 161
The average human skeleton weights about 4lbs. So lets say your very small boned and yours weighs 3 lbs.........
-
04-15-2012, 03:48 AM #90
Yeah not sure what all this talk about 30,40,60lb bone mass is anyway???
At 5'9 my bone mass is: 2644.51g (2.64451kg, 5.818lb)
how is bone size going to have much of an effect on your overall weight and composition?
-
04-15-2012, 04:09 AM #91Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Location
- post proelia praemia
- Posts
- 9,856
-
04-15-2012, 04:10 AM #92Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Location
- post proelia praemia
- Posts
- 9,856
-
04-15-2012, 05:11 AM #93Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Posts
- 5,332
-
04-15-2012, 05:14 AM #94Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Location
- post proelia praemia
- Posts
- 9,856
sorry bear, thanks for correcting me, dont want to be giving out b.s. info haha
-
04-15-2012, 05:20 AM #95
Look I dont know sh*t about bones but here is a copy of my dexa acan results that claim my bones weight that much, formulated with their density I am smack back in the middle of average for my height
Maybe im wrong but not according to this and what the person doing the scan explained to me (including bone weight)Last edited by gonzo6183; 04-15-2012 at 05:25 AM. Reason: Missing info
-
04-15-2012, 05:25 AM #96Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Location
- post proelia praemia
- Posts
- 9,856
thats only a handful out of about 200 bones so mabey that why it so low but im 100% certain that its 15-20% of gross weight
-
04-15-2012, 05:27 AM #97Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Location
- post proelia praemia
- Posts
- 9,856
actually no its not, its a summary of them
i'll show it me mate later, he a degree in sport science and is qualified to carry out them scans, it was him that told me it 15-20% of overall weight
-
04-15-2012, 05:30 AM #98
True so its definitly not a full weight of ALL the bones yet that is every major or large bone covered and if that is what they weight I cant Imagine all the other tiny bones weighing much at all.
As for 15-20% of gross weight on that theory when I used to weigh 57kg (full adult at 25) my bones were 8.5-11.4kg but now im at 88kg (31) my bones weight 13.2-17.6kg?
Adjustment to 12%-20%:
at 57kg 6.84kg-11.4kg
at 88kg 10.56-17.6kg
According to my results I am spot an average (15%, when I was 80kg)
that puts me at 12kg which could fit into the above ranges (almost)
But that doesnt explain why the 10 major sections of bones (eg full arm, not just one bone in arm) total 2.6kg?
Very interested to find out, and this is more interesting than the OPs thread anyway lolLast edited by gonzo6183; 04-15-2012 at 05:37 AM.
-
04-15-2012, 05:30 AM #99Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Location
- post proelia praemia
- Posts
- 9,856
taken from wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_skeleton
The human skeleton consists of both fused and individual bones supported and supplemented by ligaments, tendons, muscles and cartilage. It serves as a scaffold which supports organs, anchors muscles, and protects organs such as the brain, lungs and heart.
The biggest bone in the body is the bone in the thigh and the smallest is the stapes bone in the middle ear. Several factors contribute to the bone density and average mass of the human skeleton including; gender, race, hormonal factors, nutrition, physical activity and lifestyle behaviors.[1] Because of these and other factors affecting an individual's weight the human skeleton may comprise between 12 and 20 percent of a person's total body weight with the average being 15 percent.[2]
Fused bones include those of the pelvis and the cranium. Not all bones are interconnected directly: there are three bones in each middle ear called the ossicles that articulate only with each other. The hyoid bone, which is located in the neck and serves as the point of attachment for the tongue, does not articulate with any other bones in the body, being supported by muscles and ligaments.
-
04-15-2012, 05:30 AM #100
-
04-15-2012, 05:34 AM #101Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Location
- post proelia praemia
- Posts
- 9,856
-
04-15-2012, 05:39 AM #102
Edited post 2 up...
Im going to have to look into this more now or it will play on my mind. Let me know what you come up with
-
04-15-2012, 05:45 AM #103Banned
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Location
- post proelia praemia
- Posts
- 9,856
BMC = bone mineral content and it is measuring the mineral content and not the weight?
Last edited by DanB; 04-15-2012 at 05:51 AM.
-
04-15-2012, 06:46 AM #104
IF that is the case then the moron running the clinic where I went has no idea what they are doing as they were telling me it was my bone weight and then combined with a formula gave me a density, we had a full discussion on it. Hmm still going to keep looking into it to make sure 100%
-
04-15-2012, 11:28 AM #105Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- Posts
- 588
-
04-16-2012, 01:32 PM #106Associate Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 161
Fuuark. I had no idea. On my PT course I'm sure they said the skeleton weighs like 4lbs. I always thought it was a bit light.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Gearheaded
12-30-2024, 06:57 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS