Results 121 to 160 of 176
Thread: north Korea
-
07-08-2006, 03:25 PM #121
johan
Originally Posted by johan
-
07-08-2006, 06:13 PM #122Originally Posted by Logan13
Europe has learned its lessons. Maby america will in the next few hundred years.
Open up your eyes and realise the shortcomings of your own country and maby someday you will realise why the rest of the world is so critical....
-
07-08-2006, 06:15 PM #123Originally Posted by Logan13
When it comes to North Korea........the proper military solution is to level it.......that is the only proper military solution........ I have come to that
conclusion........anything short of that is just fooling around and doesn't solve
anything.
That would have been the solution in Iraq......if the civilian population
doesn't have the will to control their leaders.......then they are willing participants.........we should have leveled both Afghanistan and Iraq.......
otherwise we should stay the hell out.
-
07-08-2006, 06:17 PM #124
I also think every American should start arming themselves just in case
-
07-08-2006, 06:25 PM #125
Kind of ironic to try and use pacifist as a insult. Most of the world greatest minds has been firm pacifists. But then again what do they know
There puny minds are nothing compared to the immense intellects of people like Bush.
-
07-08-2006, 06:49 PM #126Originally Posted by johan
compromises made by the church and "neutral" countries such as Switzerland
who sold thier souls to the Nazis.
To be a true pacifist you have to be willing to die for your belief.........are you willing to do that???
Because without a balance of power against evil .....pacifism is impossible
Right now..... the US balances against what I would consider evil men.......
sometimes the boundaries are a little grey for my taste........but who do you want running the world........the Chinese mafia??
-
07-08-2006, 11:31 PM #127Originally Posted by johan
Your letting the argument cloud your judgement.
-
07-08-2006, 11:47 PM #128
oooo, johan. You know I love ya bro but I got to disagree on some things. If it wasnt for countries like the U.S., Sweden would be learning German as their primary laungage. Its not about being better or worse. Its just the way it is.
As far as N. Korea..ol fat kim is a bully and who would deal with him if we left the scene? Japan is looking to us right now to deal with the problem. No, the U.S. government has the responsibility because they have the power to do something. I still advocate standing up to him. I truly believe that he would back down. He doesn't want a war with the U.S.A.
I laughed tonight because my wife bought some Swedish vodka. I thought..hmm Im going to have to tell johan..apparently you guys make some good hooch.
-
07-09-2006, 03:41 AM #129Originally Posted by roidattack
Originally Posted by roidattack
Originally Posted by roidattack
Originally Posted by roidattack
-
07-09-2006, 03:42 AM #130Originally Posted by USfighterFC
And to everybody remaining
and his army in one hit and "Jing jong ding dong" die to and china will of course say.
-:If you never put you fingers in the game it never hade happend!!
And the ww3 have started.Last edited by The OutLord; 07-09-2006 at 03:53 AM.
-
07-09-2006, 03:57 AM #131
TBH here, this is a messed up situation.
This is how Im thinking:
-We and Israel among other countries have nukes why not N Korea? True!
-But nukes should only be obtained by sane responsible leaders!! True
-Who are we to decide who is sane and who is not? they view us as the enemy and we the same
My suggestion would be to not bother anyone untill they bother us, but if we wait until they obtain them and then bother us(ie launch just one) the casualties will be too great.
so what do we do? If we go in, I DO NOT SUPPORT SOMETHING LIKE IRAQ, a job half done, when theres a threat you eliminate it not weaken it or give it a reason to be angrier nor do I want to see more Americans die for no reason.
Even though a little voice in my head shouts equality! it is not always possible as this is not a utopian world we live in.
In the end we MUST look after OUR best interest and hopefully the ends will justify the means, if they do not stop then eliminate them.
A hard desicion to reach but it MUST be made.
-
07-09-2006, 06:04 AM #132
Do not be surprised if one of their missiles accidentally blow up in their own country, (hint, hint)
-
07-09-2006, 08:13 AM #133Originally Posted by Badgerman
imo violence is 9 times out of 10 just the way stupid people handle things. Educated people usualy refrain from fighting and so should educated countries.
-
07-09-2006, 11:20 AM #134
good points
Originally Posted by Badgerman
-
07-09-2006, 11:26 AM #135Originally Posted by Badgerman
-
07-09-2006, 11:28 AM #136Originally Posted by Logan13
Did mahatma Ghandi sell his soul? has Dalai Lama sold his soul? Do those 2 people show that pacifism acomplish nothing? Are they hiding behind people willing to use force?
-
07-09-2006, 11:30 AM #137Originally Posted by Logan13
But only under the most pressing circumstances where no other option is possible and not using force will harm more people than using force.
-
07-09-2006, 11:34 AM #138
If a person breaks into my home and threatens to hurt someone in my family I would break there neck in a instance if i had the chanse.
I would not however go out on the streets and break the neck of someone that looks like a robber just because he might break into my home.
-
07-09-2006, 11:38 AM #139
johan
Originally Posted by johan
-
07-09-2006, 11:44 AM #140
better scenario
Originally Posted by johan
-
07-09-2006, 11:49 AM #141
So what ever happened to the Politics, and religion forum, I swear you go on vcation for a week and everything changes
-
07-09-2006, 11:54 AM #142Originally Posted by Logan13
If its someone that seem serious(russia, china) I would be carefull and watch over my family. I would not slit his throath because he has a big mouth.
Also N.Korea has only threaten to respond to any violence against them. They havent threatened to do anything against america.
-
07-09-2006, 11:58 AM #143Originally Posted by Logan13
Its like saying all wars america has been in that didnt involve jet fighters are unimportant.
Well you should listen to the world when you deal with the world. What you and your goverment do within your country is your buisness. What you do in the world is the worlds buisness.
I gave you the reason why sweden wasnt involved in ww2. Not entering the war wasnt cowardice it was intelligence. It would be like you walking up to a gang of hells angels members alone and unarmed and calling them pussies. Like I said sweden entering ww2 would NOT have saved one single life and WOULD have cost alot of lifes. We where to small to make a difference either way. So not entering saved more lifes than entering. How is that not valuing life?
Sweden supported the war in afghanistan btw, but not the one in iraq. We support what is right.
If you dont want any oppinion on americas actions in the world maby you should preach for america to isolate itself? Because aslong as you meddle in other countries buisnesses my country and all others will say what they think and are entitled to do so.
-
07-09-2006, 11:59 AM #144Originally Posted by kdawg21
So is the Politics/Religion Forum done?
-
07-09-2006, 12:01 PM #145
Im very curious about your oppinion on Dalai Lama, Mahatma Ghandi, Martin Luther king and offcourse Einstein. Where they just pacifist disconnected from reality that acomplished nothing?
-
07-09-2006, 12:02 PM #146
N. Korea is like a child throwing a tantrum for attention, Kim has used this same technique multiple times and has been successful. I am sure you have heard the old saying, fool me once shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. I think there is more to the story than what we are being told. I would be less worried about N. Korea and more worried about how China and Russia refuse to go along with imposing sanctions against N. Korea. Is it just me or does it seem like the old Soviet Russia may be rearing its ugly head again? Like a hydra, cut off the head and another grows back.
-
07-09-2006, 12:06 PM #147
Damn man that sucks.............
-
07-09-2006, 12:06 PM #148
Damn man that sucks.............
-
07-09-2006, 01:02 PM #149
wishy-washy
Originally Posted by johan
Do you have a Swedish word for "wishy-washy"?
-
07-09-2006, 01:12 PM #150
men of action
Originally Posted by johan
As for the others, I guess I do not know why you brought them into this discussion. They were pacifists, but they were also men of action who set out to accomplish a goal and succeeded. To liken yourself to these men you would have to be able to say that you or your country stepped into a situation like Iraq ot n korea and worked through diplomacy that resulted in a calming of the tensions and avoided war. You guys do not even do this, Johan. You stay out of it completely, just throwing your opinions around but not solving anything. Men of action Sweden has not.........
-
07-09-2006, 01:15 PM #151
apples
Hey Johan.
You like apples?
Regardless, you are still my favorite Swede besides ABBA.
-
07-09-2006, 02:35 PM #152Originally Posted by Logan13
Originally Posted by Logan13
Like I have said earlier sweden has peacekeeping forces everywhere UN is, we are involved in diplomatic talks almost everywhere. Hell folke bernadotte(a member of swedish royal family) was even assasinated by israeli terrorist when negotiating betwen israel and palestine. I suspect you dont even know anything sweden does and just assume we do nothing. But with a population about equal to the population of New York its not like we can put any presure on any nation. Not financial, not military, nothing like that.
We do what we can for our size and you can not dismiss that in anyway because it is the truth.
And if you dont think sweden has men of action. Just look up Raoul Wallenberg for instance. Not to mention alot of swedes have held important positions in the UN. Like Hans Blix for instance or Dag Hammarskjöld that was general secretary of the UN. Carl Bildt was a important mediator in the balkan conflicts. I could go on and on but all of them have very limited options and limited power.
Hans Blix worked very hard to prevent the iraq war.
Im willing to bet sweden does more for peace in the world than ANY other country similar in size. We do far more than just give our oppinion. We back that oppinion up as much as we can.
-
07-09-2006, 02:36 PM #153
Anyway Im done with this now. All it does it piss us off, so far in all threads we have managed to stay peacefull so no point in breaking that record here
-
07-09-2006, 03:43 PM #154Originally Posted by Logan13
I consider Iraq a test ground for weaponry.......in ways they did their job.....
quick defeat.......but the military and politicians can not cope with the human condition........they have no clue and can never understand why we weren't embraced as liberators........you have people who are hot tempered, living in heat and poverty.......no wonder they are all pissed off........now we are mired in the muck.......and we're pissed off........that's why our guys are going insane too.........
These smart weapons might seem to be the solution.........but there is more of a civilian component to the problem than meets the eye........they plain
DONT LIKE US...........
my solution is either destroy the country........or leave it alone
best leave it alone and save 500 billion
-
07-09-2006, 03:48 PM #155Originally Posted by johan
-
07-09-2006, 11:22 PM #156Originally Posted by johan
-Logan13
-
07-09-2006, 11:38 PM #157
If we could only convince the religious radicals that Mars is the promised land..........and then ship them all there!!
-
07-10-2006, 07:05 AM #158Originally Posted by Logan13
-
07-10-2006, 08:58 AM #159Originally Posted by johan
Further, I would add that Europe's colonialism only ended in the 1970s. If Europe truly had learned its lessons after the great wars, they wouldn't have tried to hold on to far off lands.
-
07-10-2006, 09:04 AM #160
I think Badger said that we should leave them alone and save a few billion dollars. At the risk of sounding like a war monger, I would like to point out that war was the greatest economic venture ever created, it generates far more money than most companies ever dream of, lest I remind you that it was WWII that vaulted the United States into the world economic drivers seat, those billions of dollars that we spend on troops and supplies go right back into the economy, the rebuilding that we do in those countries will go a long way for free trade in the future and make may people rich. I believe that history has shown us that the economic benefits of a victorious war far outweigh the cost of neutrality.
*I am not a war monger, nor should my statements be construed to support war at all times. I am simply pointing out another way of viewing war in general*
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS