-
08-05-2006, 08:17 PM #1
NO evidence Iran has a nuclear weapon program!!
Yes the video is from last yr sad but very true words.
"Former UN arms inspector and former US Marine Intelligence officer says there is no evidence Iran has a nuclear weapons program "
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlI_kcd8C0ELast edited by juiceboxxx; 08-05-2006 at 08:19 PM.
-
08-06-2006, 01:59 AM #2the video is from last yr
-
08-06-2006, 03:58 AM #3Originally Posted by IronFreakX
-
08-06-2006, 04:01 AM #4Originally Posted by johan
But how diff is the actuall thing?? couldnt they hide the weapon inside a high radiation/gieiger reading are so it wouldnt show up as wierd/bizzare/odd???
-
08-06-2006, 05:22 AM #5Originally Posted by IronFreakX
But if they dont have the facilities to enrichen uranium and not the reactors to produce plutonium they wont have any weapon to hide.
-
08-06-2006, 05:27 AM #6Originally Posted by johan
That's what I meant, plus man that guy is a wacko and I wouldnt take chances with him, this is not like Sadam which we put in power to have a reason to go there.....Id atleast consider allowing UN inspectors going in NOW and checking other suspected areas UNEXPECTDLY since they have nothing to hide.
If not allowed..a few recon teams should do
-
08-06-2006, 06:02 AM #7Originally Posted by IronFreakX
Here is a pic of a french enrichment plant(beyond the cooling towers)
I think it would be hard to disguse them. Nothing is impossible but seems unlikely.
Now sober up muther****er
-
08-06-2006, 06:05 AM #8
nope you cant hide it.
-
08-06-2006, 06:30 AM #9
Scott Ritter,the man in the video, is a former UN Weapons Inspector, who in 2001 was arrested for communicating with a 16 year old girl over the internet and arranging to meet her for sex. Unfortunatley for Ritter the "girl" he was chatting with was a cop. For me this puts his credibility in question.
-
08-06-2006, 07:04 AM #10Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- The Couch
- Posts
- 956
Wake up people! Here are his two main focuses nowadays!
September 16, 2005
Iran Willing to Offer Nuclear Aid to Islamic States
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said yesterday that his country is willing to share nuclear technology with other Islamic nations, Agence France-Presse reported.
"The Islamic Republic in no way seeks weapons of mass destruction and with respect to the needs of Islamic nations for nuclear technology, we are ready to transfer nuclear knowledge to these countries," the IRNA news agency quoted
Ahmadinejad as saying.Ahmadinejad made the offer during talks with Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan while at the U.N. summit in New York, according to AFP
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has openly called for Israel to be wiped off the map.
You think he's gonna come right out and say, " I'm making nuclear bombs to wipe Israel off the map." -- if that's what he wanted to do.......
Don't be gullible.
-
08-06-2006, 07:13 AM #11
Im more interested in what Ali Khamenei wants. Isnt he the one in charge over the armed forces while Ahmadinejad is a semi puppet?
-
08-06-2006, 07:14 AM #12
There is nothing wrong with sharing nuclear technology, that is what the anglo-saxons did. Its a nations right to progress, its a nations right to acquire nuclear technology.
-
08-06-2006, 07:15 AM #13Originally Posted by johan
-
08-06-2006, 02:11 PM #14Originally Posted by Banned2
And that Ladies and Gentlemen is why we should intervene, when was the last time they allowed people in the mental ward to have access to guns??
What's any different with this thing??
Thats one mental looney and that would equal one big gun....still think its ok??
-
08-06-2006, 02:11 PM #15Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- The Couch
- Posts
- 956
Originally Posted by Banned2
So in other words, whatever the Ayatollah wants is reflected by whatever Ahmadinejad says?
-
08-06-2006, 06:17 PM #16Originally Posted by alphaman
-
08-06-2006, 07:31 PM #17
nope.
-
08-06-2006, 07:31 PM #18Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- The Couch
- Posts
- 956
Originally Posted by tiger909
Would you mind elaborating on that?
-
08-07-2006, 06:39 AM #19
he would
Originally Posted by alphaman
-
08-07-2006, 12:07 PM #20Originally Posted by alphaman
Iran is not an open democratic, or free society in any respect. The Ayatollah holds all the power and all the cards. Controlling every aspect of social, political, and security matters, as did the now deceased Taliban.
It is no secret that the midget Ahmadinejad who is a small man in every sense of the word is completely and deliberately nothing more than a figure head designed to show the world that Iran has an elected leader.
It is and has always been the wish of this religious extremist regime to destroy Israel and spread its flavor of radical Islam across the mideast and of course the globe.
So not to break from the topic, I will say yes of course they are after "the Bomb" and will use it the very second it is complete. Iran is a threat to be taken seriously and should be dealt with seriously.Last edited by singern; 08-07-2006 at 12:18 PM.
-
08-07-2006, 12:17 PM #21
hmmm....................
-
08-07-2006, 12:57 PM #22
From todays paper
TEHRAN, Iran — Iran's top nuclear negotiator said Sunday that Iran will expand — not suspend — uranium enrichment activities, in defiance of a U.N. Security Council resolution setting an August 31 deadline for the Islamic Republic to halt nuclear activities or face the threat of political and economic sanctions.
IMO: If truly for domestic energy purposes, whats the hurry? Iran has more oil then any one nation could use in a lifetime.
So why would Iran intentionally generate tension across the globe? Could it be they have a mission? could it be they have an agenda? The answer is Yes, and we all know what it is.
-
08-07-2006, 12:59 PM #23Originally Posted by singern
good post, I agree and we shall wait and see
-
08-07-2006, 03:31 PM #24Originally Posted by singern
why shouldnt they do it now? the tension u speak of is artificial tension created by bush, extremely similar to the tension on iraq in 2003...
iran is a soveriegn nation that has never done anything to harm another country...not since the revolution at least
-
08-07-2006, 06:47 PM #25Originally Posted by Banned5
mehh....sooner or later they will find out for them selves
btw what a hot stud in your avy
-
08-07-2006, 06:50 PM #26Originally Posted by tiger909
What is the hurry?
why create and feed this atmosphere of tension?
Why does a country with so much oil need Nuclear energy so badly?
Why does a country with so many refineries and oil based electric generating facilities need Nuclear energy so badly?
Why the suspicious, illogical, and belligerent need to defy the international community on every aspect of negotiations?
What is the hurry?
When I look at all these questions and add the continuous call from Irans religious and political leaders to destroy Israel and kill all Jews I have to come to the conclusion that I have, and so it seems has the rest of the worldLast edited by singern; 08-07-2006 at 07:04 PM.
-
08-07-2006, 07:02 PM #27Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- The Couch
- Posts
- 956
Notice that anytime Caus responds to the nuclear thing that it's always a generic statement like "every nation has the right to have a nuclear energy program". He'll give a long elaborate explantion on the relationship between the Ayatollah and Ahmadinejad, but never any type of explaination or elaborate defense of the idea that it's really all about nuclear energy. Caus knows what's going on.
One thing I've noticed about him over time is that he's smart in the way that he picks the right arguments. He stays away from the ones he knows will get him into trouble.
-
08-07-2006, 07:03 PM #28Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- The Couch
- Posts
- 956
Originally Posted by singern
The writing is on the wall but no one wants to read it. Or they know what it says and they just want fool everyone into believing it's not there.
-
08-07-2006, 07:11 PM #29Originally Posted by alphaman
Plain and simple. The world is so busy kissing rear to get oil, and so here we are.
-
08-07-2006, 10:05 PM #30
We are nearly in the same position as the world was in the 1930's. A few countries, seduced and led by megalomanic fascist racist dictators re-arming, sabre rattleing, and making a mockery of any legit form of international negoitian. In the 1930's England, France, USA, Belgium, etc...had the military might to stop Italy, Germany, and Japan in its tracks..but not the WILL.
Same today...USA, England, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Canada, etc...have the force to remove the threat of a nuclear exchange somewhere in the not so distance future...but not the WILL. Iran, Syria, and company will have to be dealt with by force at some time.....the question is...does the world wait until this facist racist dictatorships gain nuclear weapons....or does it act now. If not acted on soon, our children, Western and Middle Eastern, will face trying to live through a nuclear exchange...So the price of appeasement...always brings on even worse destruction than the appeasement sought to avoid in the first place.
-
08-07-2006, 10:27 PM #31Originally Posted by singern
i already answered ur questions... this era is no different than any other period, except the fact that western powers are putting unfounded suspicion upon the iranian regime (a la iraq circa 2003) history always repeats itself
what terror organisation does iran currently support, and have sources please
(ps, hezb is a militia, not a terror group)
-
08-07-2006, 10:36 PM #32Originally Posted by Banned5
ROFL......
Ok let's look at the facts here!!!.
The typical member will be male and the average age can range from 12 on up
So they have 12 yr olds fighting, and then they say Israel is killing CHILDREN PAY ATTN TO THIS BS.
If they choose to recruit their children to fight, then seriously...FVCK EM.....If you dont shoot, you die....if you shoot they say your a blood thristy terrorist...JUST REMEMBER WHO IS CAUSING THIS!!!!!
Following the UNHCR "tens of thousands of Basijis had been ordered to prowl about every factory, office and school to ensure that everyone adhered to the Islamic code. [...] After the summer 1992 riots Basij units were revived, rearmed and sent out into the streets to help enforce Islamic law. The Basijis are reportedly under the control of local mosques. It was further said that the Basijis set up checkpoints around the cities and stopped cars to sniff their occupant's breath for alcohol and check for women wearing make-up or travelling with a man not their close relative or husband. It was reported that the Law of Judicial Support for the Basijis, published in the Official Gazette No. 13946 of 8.10.1371 (December 1992), provided no redress against arbitrary detention by the Basijis." Iran's permanent representative to the U.N. denied these charges.[4]
The people of iran will not tolerate this BS, they will welcome US, you know why?? because they are humans, and humans are meant to have fun not sit all day and do the shit you think they have to do.
-
08-08-2006, 12:59 AM #33
they get into training i think he means.
not get into combat at 12.
but both ways thats one thing i dont agree with .
but bush is not any better calls young men for combat and sends them away.
unfortantly some dont make it back ..
see really in war and politics there will never be a winner they all break rules.
-
08-08-2006, 02:06 AM #34Originally Posted by singern
I am a strong suporter for countries developing nuclear power(not weapons, no one should have nuclear weapons) when they are able to. But Irans behavior is just not right, doesnt add up to peacefull purposes.
But Iran is right in one thing. As far as anyone know they are acting in accordance to the NPT and they are beeing treated differently than other nations would have been in the same situation like Brazil for instance. They are not lying when they claim the world is discriminating them in this case. The big question is. Are we right in doing so?
-
08-08-2006, 02:31 AM #35Originally Posted by johan
korea has nuc bombs they test them and all.
not much been done there.
iran dont even have nuc weapons and some are having cry bout it.
-
08-08-2006, 08:29 AM #36Originally Posted by tiger909
Last edited by singern; 08-08-2006 at 10:44 AM.
-
08-08-2006, 10:31 AM #37Originally Posted by johan
http://www.irna.ir/en/news/view/menu...1568192040.htm
http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/Iran/Oil.html
http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/pgulf.html
On the subject of discrimination, I agree with you and others that every nation has the right to nuclear energy, however when that nations political and religious leaders are continuously calling for the destruction of another nation and the death of its citizens, then they lose all support, and right to obtain such a dangerous power.
Interestingly enough the only ones who are in support of Iran obtaining nuke power, are the ones who coincidentally hate Israel and the USA.
1+1 always = 2Last edited by singern; 08-08-2006 at 10:37 AM.
-
08-08-2006, 11:09 AM #38
#1 Iran is not doing it for energy needs. They want a bomb.
#2 They dont have refineries. They export crude and import refined oil.
#3 If Iran has nukes..terrorists have nukes..hence it will be stopped.
-
08-08-2006, 11:10 AM #39Originally Posted by singern
But if they want to start preparing for the future now is a good time to get off fossile fuels. Even if they have plenty of oil now they probably wont in another 20-30 years. Changing the energy infrastructur takes time and money. Offcourse the other actions points toward more sinister goals.
Originally Posted by singern
-
08-08-2006, 11:38 AM #40Originally Posted by roidattack
Originally Posted by roidattack
The Iranian Oil Ministry is planning the construction of three new refineries for oil and gas condensates, as well as the refurbishing of a number of existing refineries, the Oil Minister, Kazem Vaziri Hamaneh said.
Originally Posted by roidattack
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
11-11-2024, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS