norma deca and paki sus

**Grizzly420** · 10-27-2005, 11:47 AM

real or fake

**Phenom** · 10-27-2005, 12:05 PM

the sus look pretty damn good to me bro. 3 of the Decas look good but the one looks to be bigger and have slightly dodgy looking crimps...... amyone else think that?

**Grizzly420** · 10-27-2005, 12:13 PM

thanks for the feed back

**Grizzly420** · 10-27-2005, 12:14 PM

what about the sus

**Phenom** · 10-27-2005, 12:20 PM

yeah those sus look bang on to me me mate, they are exactly like the ones i'm on at the moment and they seem to be working well

**Grizzly420** · 10-27-2005, 12:21 PM

just got them and started this tuesday got a sore but

**Grizzly420** · 10-27-2005, 12:22 PM

my heart rate seems to have picked up the pace

**Phenom** · 10-27-2005, 12:24 PM

yeah mine too, i'm only on the sus with D-bols. Apparently the Deca takes a bit of the sting out of the jab?

**ToTheBuckeT21** · 10-27-2005, 12:24 PM

I had that deca like 6 months ago.. it looked like that but i'm not sure about every little detail

**Grizzly420** · 10-27-2005, 12:28 PM

thanks for the feed back all the info is well welcome

**ToTheBuckeT21** · 10-27-2005, 12:29 PM

i did alittle searchin around for ya.. and i'm like 99% your deca is good to go

**Grizzly420** · 10-27-2005, 12:30 PM

thanks man i got probally 10hrs on this web forum getting pics and info i was 99.9% sure they were but im new so an outside source like this forum is good feedback

**Phenom** · 10-27-2005, 12:37 PM

here you go bro; this is my paki sus along with box- had to scan it cos my camera is sh*te!

**Grizzly420** · 10-27-2005, 12:43 PM

thanks for the pic man much appreciated

**MichaelCC** · 10-27-2005, 01:50 PM

**SnaX** · 10-27-2005, 02:38 PM

Im no expert, but the pic second from the left..
The middle two vials... the vial second from the left looke scratched on the bottom of the crimp like it was done all sloppy.. and the on second from the right looks unevenly crimped; sort of wavey crimp...

Quick edit.:

On the word "nandrolone "? Is that the right "E" or not? I remember another topic like this where i think it was SJ or michaelcc that pointed the difference of the "E"....little underhang on the bottom of the E.... Is it right or not?
However it looks right...
http://forums.steroid.com/attachment...chmentid=51463
Just pointing out details.

**Grizzly420** · 10-27-2005, 03:33 PM

MichaelCC if you look at your attachment 51462 your far right amp looks taller also or is just me

**MichaelCC** · 10-27-2005, 03:56 PM

Originally Posted by Grizzly420

MichaelCC if you look at your attachment 51462 your far right amp looks taller also or is just me

sorry bro, but you are wrong. Maybe it's becasue of pictuers, but all amps has the same height. You can see it easily on another pictures too. All pictures was done with same 5 pieces of norma. I have no differences between amps size, but you has. And your difference is very good visible. it's not only me who found it out.
If you think your normas are right, it's your opinion. My opinion is, it's not right. The taller one for sure ...

**Grizzly420** · 10-27-2005, 04:47 PM

MichealCC thanks for your response i greatly appreciate it alot that is the only one that is that way

**...medX...** · 10-27-2005, 08:49 PM

I believe that bigger amp of deca is not good but the rest looks very good to me, as for the sust I'm sure it is good

**Seajackal** · 10-28-2005, 04:30 AM

Grizzly, were your decas lined all in the same distance when you took the pics?
Big Mike, I think the difference is due to the unlined vials the "smaller" one seems
to be a little far from the other ones? But hell yeah, Big Mike you're a good
observer! My opinion is that they are good to go, the crimps, fonts of label,
batch/exp match and the letter "E" as Snax said is the right "E" in Grizzly's vials.
If they came from North, you're good to go, bro!

**MichaelCC** · 10-28-2005, 08:33 AM

Thanx for your input SJ, but anyway I think, somethings wrong with the taller deca . I never said these Normas are fake, but this one (taller) looks very suspicions to me. If there were Egypt sustanons, there will be no problems with different amp size, but there are Normas and that's why I'm little bit suspicions about it.
Maybe it's just some kind of rarity or 1.april joke from Norma

Or maybe, this amp is only in the cycle right now, so it's bigger than anothers

**powerbodybuilder** · 10-28-2005, 03:11 PM

Its possible a deffect from factory but maybe dont use it.

**Grizzly420** · 10-28-2005, 05:06 PM

thanks guys

**intensity911** · 10-29-2005, 12:37 AM

Originally Posted by Phenom

here you go bro; this is my paki sus along with box- had to scan it cos my camera is sh*te!

those paki are fach im sure of that.look at the date not computer dot and the writing is one size letters rather than two.fake fake fake

**Phenom** · 10-29-2005, 01:50 AM

You reckon eh? What do you think SJ, MCC, PowerBB? you bro's are the experts on this! They seem to be working, as did the last batch i had.

**Seajackal** · 10-29-2005, 03:48 AM

Don't listen to intensity he might be in his days...

**MichaelCC** · 10-29-2005, 08:37 AM

Even I'm not big expert in the case of Pakistan Sustanon , I also think his Sustanon is OK.

**juicy_brucy** · 10-29-2005, 09:36 AM

1000% real sustanon . You are good to go. I don't care what anyone else says, they are real. They are real.

**mr.freeze** · 10-29-2005, 10:19 AM

i got those same karachi and i took it for 6 weeks for a total 3500mg and nothing no strenght,no pump,just a big 1 pounds.and they look the same like yours!

**Grizzly420** · 10-29-2005, 10:32 AM

thaks guys keep the feedback coming need to know i can trust me source

**MichaelCC** · 10-29-2005, 10:40 AM

Originally Posted by mr.freeze

i got those same karachi and i took it for 6 weeks for a total 3500mg and nothing no strenght,no pump,just a big 1 pounds.and they look the same like yours!

"mr.freeze" - taking AS without paying attentions to another factors doesn't guarantee any progress. Maybe you don't know, but about 75% of everything in bodybuilding is diet and trainning. AS has smaller effect to your total progress then diet+training.
I knew many guys who had better profit without taking AS, just with changing their diet, like another guys who were taking AS. If you pay little attention to your diet, you cannot wait for big profits. But this is theme for another forum

**mr.freeze** · 10-29-2005, 12:17 PM

my diet is pretty ok!but anyways i dont want to come back to that karachi story again i had enough,just wanted to share my experience.by the way how come that all the karachi pics does not come with the original box!!! hum.....! im wondering????

**Grizzly420** · 10-29-2005, 12:44 PM

i have them locked up just didnt bring them out i was trying to get my pics done before my kids got up and i had alot of problems with clarity in the first set of pics i had one of the boxes i just went and looked at the bn #s and they do match

**...medX...** · 10-29-2005, 04:28 PM

Originally Posted by MichaelCC

"mr.freeze" - taking AS without paying attentions to another factors doesn't guarantee any progress. Maybe you don't know, but about 75% of everything in bodybuilding is diet and trainning. AS has smaller effect to your total progress then diet+training.
I knew many guys who had better profit without taking AS, just with changing their diet, like another guys who were taking AS. If you pay little attention to your diet, you cannot wait for big profits. But this is theme for another forum

well said

**mr.freeze** · 10-29-2005, 06:06 PM

if you got them with original box its ok! but alot of people get them with out the box.in my city people buy them in ziplock or saranwrap what a joke.

**Seajackal** · 10-29-2005, 06:10 PM

That's mean nothing, the sources just get rid of the boxes to make things easier to
cross the borders, that's why people sometimes got their shit without boxes, if you
get the boxes living in USA or Canada, you're lucky!

**powerbodybuilder** · 10-29-2005, 10:44 PM

The Sust in the first pic is 100%.

**fino** · 10-30-2005, 05:30 AM

my deca look the same as yours. but my print on my E and my date seem to be not as boldly printed as yours the date on mine are E 03 2006

it just had me wondering if mine could be fake the crimps look good to me on mine sorry no pics thas why i depend on posted like these. any advice i would be greatful

thanx