Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    winger11 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    46

    Upper chest not where i want

    Guys i've been disappointed with my upper chest. I can't seem to build it up. Anyone have any really good upper chest workouts. On chest days I usually start with flat bench, incline dumbbell press, incline dumbbell flys, decline flys, cable crossovers.
    My max bench is 345. Incline dumbbell 125's
    Any help thanks guys. I just dont have the look i want the strength is there.

  2. #2
    DSM4Life's Avatar
    DSM4Life is offline Snook~ AR Lounge Monitor
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    30,963
    Blog Entries
    1
    The muscle is ONE muscle. There is no working just the upper/lower/sideways/ whatever the hell you want to call it.

  3. #3
    Matt's Avatar
    Matt is offline AR's Hot British Pimp Daddy ~HOF~
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    No source checks
    Posts
    31,195
    Blog Entries
    1
    ^^ Correct, genetics dictate chest shape..

  4. #4
    Ronnie Rowland's Avatar
    Ronnie Rowland is offline Author of Functional Training with a Fork
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    3,153
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by winger11 View Post
    Guys i've been disappointed with my upper chest. I can't seem to build it up. Anyone have any really good upper chest workouts. On chest days I usually start with flat bench, incline dumbbell press, incline dumbbell flys, decline flys, cable crossovers.
    My max bench is 345. Incline dumbbell 125's
    Any help thanks guys. I just dont have the look i want the strength is there.
    10 degree declines for starters followed by 10 degree inclines. Flye machine is also good if you are lagging..

  5. #5
    molecule is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    277
    Pectorial! Its one single muscle! ITs genetic! Some ppl show better growth in upper some show lower some show both. When u do any variation, ie. incline, decline, fly etc the chest overall gets worked out.

    Also i find decline bench useless.

  6. #6
    Matt's Avatar
    Matt is offline AR's Hot British Pimp Daddy ~HOF~
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    No source checks
    Posts
    31,195
    Blog Entries
    1
    Yeah, i dont care what anyone says or believes, incline working the upper chest only and decline working the lower chest only is BS. You either work the chest as a whole or you dont..

  7. #7
    Phate's Avatar
    Phate is offline Got Diet? ~VET~ AR Hall of Famer~
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    10,940
    Quote Originally Posted by MAD MATT View Post
    Yeah, i dont care what anyone says or believes, incline working the upper chest only and decline working the lower chest only is BS. You either work the chest as a whole or you dont..
    i agree^^^ though i believe that you can put emphasis on which muscle(pec major vs. minor) you are working by manipulating angles

  8. #8
    FireGuy's Avatar
    FireGuy is offline 9/11/2001~343 Never Forget!~E-HOF~RETIRED
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Center Stage
    Posts
    7,215
    Quote Originally Posted by MAD MATT View Post
    Yeah, i dont care what anyone says or believes, incline working the upper chest only and decline working the lower chest only is BS. You either work the chest as a whole or you dont..
    I understand the principle of your statement but I think it is going to far. If this was the truly the case there would be no need to do more than one single exercise for any muscle. If you look at the insertions of the pectoral muscle it should be easy to see how pushing the arms upwards in an incline movement will activate more muscle fibers in the upper chest than pushing them downwards. Is the WHOLE chest still going to be activated? Yes, but that doesnt mean you cant stress some fibers more than others. Think of doing a straight bar bench press as opposed to a cable of DB fly. The plane of the movement it totally different and the muscle fibers near the sternum need to contract to a greater degree to brings the hands together.

    I am not totally discounting Matts statement as I believe there is some validity to it especially with muscles like the soleus which are basically only activated upon one plane of motion.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •