-
02-14-2013, 11:33 AM #41
-
02-14-2013, 11:44 AM #42Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Californication
- Posts
- 5,656
Really disappointed with the new C7. I fell in love with the C6 when it first hit in 2005, and knew I would be getting one at some point soon after. I sold my 2008 supercharged LSIII, with anticipation to get the C7 after it launched; possibly a Z06 model if offered. Won't be happening!! The front end of the car isn't all that bad, in fact I think it's pretty well done. However, if the best GM can do is to put a Camaro rear end on it after all these years of think tanking it, then that's just poor vision IMO. You know, the rear end wouldn't be all that bad if they would have maybe stuck to the traditional ROUND tail lights that are signature with the Corvettes. Oh well, I think I will keep an eye out for a next-to-new C6 Z06, black on black.
-
02-14-2013, 12:22 PM #43
American made muscle cars have been the best bang for the buck for the past couple years. Their performance is awesome, people need to get over the vettes interior, just because top gear says it isn't great doesn't mean it sucks. I'm not bashing on foreign cars but i'm so tired of people pissing and moaning about the interior quality when its not that bad. Is it the best? No, but its not terrible.
New vette is ugly imo. I liked the c6, c5 and c4 a lot and have driven all of them. Great cars.Last edited by Armykid93; 02-14-2013 at 12:24 PM.
-
02-14-2013, 12:27 PM #44
-
02-14-2013, 12:34 PM #45
When you are spending $50k+ on a car... you shouldn't get a cheap plastic interior.....
Keep in mind that when you start getting into the $40K+ range you are talking a "luxury" vehicle regardless of if its a sports car or a old man cruiser like a Cadillac. If you take a Corvette and compare it to all the other cars in the same price range; you don't get much for your money when it comes to "luxury" and no Corvettes are not that fast until you get up into Z06 and ZR1 territory both which are $70K+ models. For $70K you should not be getting a cheap plastic interior regardless of what brand you buy. I expect luxury for my $70K not injection molded plastic, lol.
-
02-14-2013, 01:21 PM #46
I think they look great imo. And the base car is quite powerful and meant to be quite nice inside.
-
02-14-2013, 03:21 PM #47
-
02-14-2013, 03:22 PM #48
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Location
- Business as usual yeah?
- Posts
- 4,078
- Blog Entries
- 1
I disagree with some of what you're saying Dan but im not as qualified to disagree as I should be having never driven a lot of the cars you have thrown out. I just feel if Car and Driver and the other magazines are to be believed that in the proper hands some of the vettes of today can hang with lambos and ferraris. Then again maybe theyre full of shit. I don't think I would care so much about interior if I paid 70k and got a car that can whoop up on a 200k gallardo.
-
02-14-2013, 03:26 PM #49
-
02-14-2013, 04:14 PM #50
I've been in alot of super cars. The vettes are cheaper for a reason, yes the interior is cheaper. The fit and finish isnt there. You can just feel the difference when you close the door on a vette and on a Porsche.
i understand the concept of a 70k car that can keep with a 150k car. But who cares, your not just buying a lambo for track times. And you cant buy a cheap Ferrari or lambo. Yet you can get a cheap vette, i cant count how many old men and women i see driving vettes. If chevy want to make the vette a true supper car they need to drop the entry level models.If people can't tell your on steroids then your doing them wrong
-
02-14-2013, 04:15 PM #51
-
02-14-2013, 04:21 PM #52
-
02-14-2013, 04:56 PM #53
I don't make a ton of money. So To be able to afford a Lambo, Ferrari or Porsche is unreachable for most.
And this is why the Vette exists.
Its for the Common person.
You can rant all you want about the interior of the Vette.
But I'll take the Vette and drop another $30,000 into it. And whoop the doors off ANY STOCK Lambo ,Ferrari or Porsche in a straight line or track.
Plus have enough money left over for a nice down payment on a house.
You won't have to worry about my interior you'll be to busy looking at tail lights .
Not to mention the price of up keep on exotics is stupid. $25,000 for new brakes.
$50,000 for new rotors.
If I was a millionaire sure I'd have exotics
Dan so say I buy a zl1 vette for $110,000 and it has a cheaper interior.
And you spend 300k but have an awesome interior.
Do you think for the extra $190,000 I saved I couldn't turn around and build a much better interior then the exotic you bought.
I mean come on.
The reason exotics costs soooo much is the name. You pay for the name. Yes they are awesome cars of most of our dreams but they are STATEMENT cars.
Exotics are not a representation of the BEST performing car for the price you pay.Last edited by DB1982; 02-14-2013 at 05:49 PM.
-
02-14-2013, 05:52 PM #54
-
02-14-2013, 06:05 PM #55
got to disagree on this point. You pay more for these cars for one single mathematical equation... R&D costs / number of units sold
example...
Toyota spends 800 million to develop the new corolla, they sell 600,000 of this chassis, cost per vehicle just for R&D is over $1,300 then you have materials to build each car...
Ferrari spends close to that amount to develop the 458 that will only see less than 16,000 units made. Cost per unit is almost 50K and then you are dealing with paying SKILLED labour to hand craft the far more expensive materials going into each part of the car... not some junior high grad pulling pieces of stamped steel out of a press. Yes, there is a handsome profit on each car, but roughly the same % if you were to scale it back to the price of the Corolla.
A Lambo has even fewer chassis built so the cost/unit goes up...
The numbers may not be entirely accurate, but you get the point.
As for interiors... I would sooner not pay for a sexy interior as all mine get torn out to make way for a cage =)
-
02-14-2013, 06:14 PM #56
Yeah but Chevys top of the line sports car one year had the same steering wheel as the Vega.Now thats impressive and I hope they put better seats in it this year.Now dont get me wrong I like the vette.Always wanted one.But Chevy is got to get their head out of their ash!
-
02-14-2013, 06:20 PM #57
-
02-14-2013, 07:44 PM #58
-
02-14-2013, 08:41 PM #59
I just don't understand what you mean by fit and finish. I've been in Aston Martins and Bentleys and even an r8 I just don't understand the draw. If I can get just as much performance for so much less why wouldn't I?
I honestly wanna know what do you mean fit and finish?
Is it simply the fact that other people know you're driving an expensive car?
-
02-14-2013, 10:56 PM #60
Plastic has no place in a vehicle that costs more than 25K... dont care if its "weight savings", for 70K it should be carbon fibre
-
02-14-2013, 11:22 PM #61
Not only that Armykid, but also the vette is the only true sports production car built on an assembly line. whereas all those higher priced cars have to be made off line thereby raising the cost beyond most of what we everyday guys can afford. So thanks to GM for still being able to supply some nice competitive sports cars for us. Because I for one don't have a couple million just laying around to purchase that lamborghini with. not yet anyways..
-
02-15-2013, 12:27 AM #62
Okay- gonna try and address all the previous posts from earlier in this one response. Sorry- was gone; had to fire my girlfriend (yes on VDay long story don't wanna talk about it).
Anyways.... So realize what you are getting when you buy a Corvette ZR1 and pay $110,000.00. For that same $110K there are DOZENS of other cars out there that actually justify the price. Look at the Porsche 911 Carerra S... same price as ZR1... and almost as fast in a straight line and faster on the track (in most instances). In the Porsche- you are getting everything leather, every single piece of the car fits together perfect..... and in the Corvette you get a standard Vette with a different hood, a lot more HP, and a few "ZR1" tidbits... that none of which adds up to the $70K delta between a standard $50K Vette and a $110K ZR1. So... why buy the ZR1? Reality is- most can't use the extra HP on the road and most don't go to the track anyways. You can buy SOOOO many other cars for that $110K that make that ZR1 look like the plastic POS it really is. All the BMW "M" series, almost all the Mercedes AMG models, most Porsche except Turbo 911.... all in the same price range but a lot higher quality. Go look at a $40K Mercedes C Class or BMW 3 series and you'll see they are a lot better fit/finish than the $110K Corvette.
Yes- you can buy any "stock" car and put some money into it to make it faster than almost any production model. You can buy a POS 1989 Mustang and put $30K into it and smoke a $1.3M Bugatti..... BUT... its still a POS 1989 Mustang. Each to his own. I myself prefer new cars and I like to get my money's worth. I've owned BMW, MB, Porsche, Bentley, Jeep, etc. I drive a Jeep Grand Cherokee every day because it has MORE stuff than the $130K Range Rover Supercharged and costs less than half that so I'm not all about I have to be in a Ferrari for it to matter. I buy cars that are fast on the track because 90% of the time I'm driving my Jeep. The other 10% of the time which is mostly on the track- I want the fastest lap time I can get.
-
02-15-2013, 12:28 AM #63
-
02-15-2013, 12:30 AM #64
Uhm.. Porsche's are built on an automated production line. Outside of the Carrera GT... none are hand built. Porsche is actually a "volume" manufacturer in Germany. Even the $200K Turbo 911 is built on an automated assembly line. Lambo, Ferrari, Rolls, Bentley... those are hand built which is why they will cost you your left nut to own one.
-
02-15-2013, 12:32 AM #65
EXACTLY!!!!! They already have "mass production" carbon fiber at most manufacturers. Its not like some dude is hand laying every carbon fiber part one layer at a time. Manufacturing processes have gotten to the point that its no more difficult to build carbon in mass production than it is plastic. BUT... plastic is cheaper and Carbon eats up profits.
-
02-15-2013, 09:06 AM #66
Most porches aren't faster than the Corvette period. Plus the maintenance and all the other garbage that goes along with owning a high end car, its not worth it. I'll still take the Corvette.
Even when the zr1 was re released in like 09 car and driver as well as many other companies with the sole purpose of judging cars have been ranking the zr1 better than lambos and all other manner of super car. and the zr1 WAS sh!!t in 09. Now the zr1 is tested on the Nuremberg ring, Ferrari uses GM suspension in their cars now because of the zr1 and cts-v.
Hate on domestics all you want, they will keep dominating cars much pricier regardless
-
02-15-2013, 09:15 AM #67
Haven't we had this discussion before?
There is not a single domestic vehicle out there that is dominating anything.... You can buy a GTR for $90Kish and hand a ZR1 its ass. There is more to a car than what is published in magazines for lap times and such. Fiat is sold by Chrysler in the US.... doesn't make a Fiat a Ferrari.
-
02-15-2013, 09:18 AM #68
-
02-15-2013, 09:20 AM #69
-
02-15-2013, 09:20 AM #70
Last edited by Armykid93; 02-15-2013 at 09:25 AM.
-
02-15-2013, 09:24 AM #71
-
02-15-2013, 09:26 AM #72
I'll give up the less than 1 second difference for soft leather, an Alcantara headliner, PDK, etc... lol.
If GM wants to sell Corvettes... the "Stingray" should've been what the original Stingray was back in the day..... its not even close enough to justify the name on the new one.
-
02-15-2013, 09:27 AM #73
-
02-15-2013, 09:27 AM #74
That car is so damn rare around here that my buddy had to wait 11 months to get his and it was the only in town for 5 more months after that... sexy ass car. A bobcat backed into it and cracked the rear carbon diffuser and it was $17K to replace. What was the MSRP on that side of the border? He got hosed up here
Last edited by Knockout_Power; 02-15-2013 at 09:29 AM.
-
02-15-2013, 09:31 AM #75
I was around $134K with taxes in 2012. The damn thing ate up tires like you wouldn't believe. I got about 2,000 miles out of a a set and that was without driving like a jackass. I ended up trading it in on a new Porsche 911S (type 991) and although I'm happy with the 991- miss that C63. That thing was just fun to drive and you could take it anywhere like a "normal" car.
-
02-15-2013, 10:45 AM #76
-
02-15-2013, 10:49 AM #77
-
02-15-2013, 11:11 AM #78
http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...omparison-test
http://www.autospies.com/news/SHOWDO...3-Coupe-74043/
Google "991S" and read for yourself.... I don't need to sit here all day and give you links. Magazine reviews are junk IMHO....Last edited by dan991; 02-15-2013 at 11:14 AM.
-
02-15-2013, 11:24 AM #79
Funny how the zr1 isn't even in those articles.
Btw I didn't ask for links lolLast edited by Armykid93; 02-15-2013 at 11:28 AM.
-
02-15-2013, 11:36 AM #80
There are maybe a handful cars out there that are all carbon fiber 100%. Most have some mix of carbon, steel, plastic, fiberglass, etc. My point was when you sit in a Corvette... you see a plastic dashboard, plastic trim, some cheap leather here and there, and if you spend $110K some carbon fiber tidbits. Go look at a VW Jetta or Passat and they have more leather/wood/carbon trim inside for sub $30K than a $110K Corvette does.
Right now I have a Jeep Grand Cherokee Overland Summit. Fully loaded, only comes one way. Most expensive Jeep outside of the SRT8. $53K MSRP.... and guess what... I got that instead of a Range Rover simply because the Range Rover isn't worth the additional $70K when the Jeep actually has more features than the Rover. BUT... the Jeep is nowhere near the quality of build or interior trim even fully loaded. I'm not against American cars.... I'm against over charging for garbage which is exactly what a Corvette is.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
Yesterday, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS