Results 281 to 320 of 418
-
01-05-2007, 06:33 PM #2812/3 Deca 1/3 Test
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 7,964
I dont think I will ever be able to do short heavy cycles simply because when my doses are in the high range, I feel like shit and cant even eat/workout right.
Moderate longer cycles seem like my only option really.
-
01-05-2007, 06:34 PM #282
Goose pm coming your way bro..
-
01-07-2007, 03:39 AM #283Originally Posted by Skullsmasher
-
01-08-2007, 06:47 AM #284Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Originally Posted by stupidhippo
Jason Meuller (a friend of mine) said he was rarely sober/straight...
-
01-08-2007, 09:47 AM #285Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
To call renegade pharmacologist Paul Borresen an authority on drug usage is an enormous understatement. When it comes to firsthand experience, Paul may very well be the authority! I can't think of too many people who have pushed the pharmacological envelope as far as Paul. Yet, what makes this remarkable man so different than many of the pro bodybuilders who merely stay on whatever gear they can get for as long as they can get it, Paul is one of the most knowledgeable people around in the science of anabolic steroids .
University trained, Paul received his bachelor's degree in biochemistry. He graduated with first-class honors. He then went on to get his master's degree in pharmacology, specializing in the study of receptor sites and their function. He's had his work published in medical journals throughout the world, written several books, and had over 200 articles appear in magazines on the various aspects of steroid use and their application to bodybuilding. When some of the top professionals need advice on how to arrange their stacks and cycles for a major show, they call Paul. That list of top professionals?according to Paul?even includes a fellow by the name of Dorian Yates.
Some people have practical knowledge. Some people have the schooling. Paul Borresen has both, not to mention a 285-pound physique that doesn't stray far from around 8% body fat! How many of today's "gurus" do you know that can make the same claim?
If you're opposed to the radical usage of performance-enhancement drugs, then move on?get the heck out of here. This article isn't for you. For those of you with a more daring nature who'd like to learn from this particular master, you may proceed?with caution.
You can believe whatever you want about Paul but ive studied short cycles weather they are light or heavy and ive have research going back over years, ive tried every kind of cycling and i am a firm believer in short cycles of anykind, if the correct things are in place the muscle growth is amazing,weather you believe Paul to be any good or not that doesnt mean his theory behind short cycling doesnt work, there have been many Top BB who have stated when they have retired that they did this type of cycling, here are some of PB's books he wrote it might be better if you read up on the subject first Anthony, hope it helps
Anabolic Edge,-1,The Anabolic Edge 2001
Written by the legend PB, this masterpiece, if you had to pick one, would be the best because it details the combination of drugs, supplements and foods and how they interact “anabolically” with each other more thoroughly than any steroid book.
The Stack,- How To Stack Steroids
The “Stack Master” strikes again. But this time Paul devotes an entire book The Stack to this most fascinating subject. Now you’ll easily be certified by the post office as a “new zip code” once you try any one of the dozens of stacks Paul has used to “manufacture” the biggest bodybuilders in the world. Must be 21 to read! The most controversial steroid book on the market.
The Big Secret,
The governor (mag)
Testosterone magazine,
-
01-08-2007, 01:25 PM #286Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
In the end, in my estimation, Paul had people shooting a bottle (or more) per day of anabolics, and they got bigger. I don't see the genius in that.
I think it's unsafe and irresponsible, honestly.
-
01-08-2007, 01:35 PM #287
http://www.anabolicextreme.com/anabo...ssue47_MAD.htm
This is a good read on paul.
-
01-08-2007, 03:32 PM #288Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Originally Posted by twiney
Jason and I are currently working on a joint project (article) concerning steroids , if anyone is interested.
-
01-08-2007, 03:48 PM #289Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
Would be great if you get get the rest of the interview,and post it here from him.
Who is Jason Meuller? A destrcption? He writer like you?
-
01-09-2007, 07:46 AM #290Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
tghis is fro previous post re-read it-
University trained, Paul received his bachelor's degree in biochemistry. He graduated with first-class honors. He then went on to get his master's degree in pharmacology, specializing in the study of receptor sites and their function. He's had his work published in medical journals throughout the world, written several books, and had over 200 articles appear in magazines on the various aspects of steroid use and their application to bodybuilding. When some of the top professionals need advice on how to arrange their stacks and cycles for a major show, they call Paul. That list of top professionals?even includes a fellow by the name of Dorian Yates.
Some people have practical knowledge. Some people have the schooling. Paul Borresen has both, not to mention a 285-pound physique that doesn't stray far from around 8% body fat! How many of today's "gurus" do you know that can make the same claim?
For me he speaks for himself and your opinion is yours to have just like mine about todays so called steriod guros who copy other people work and many look like long distant runners, and many have a motive which is money driven, they are always selling something with magical powers, for me id rather listen to someone who as credability and looks like a bodybuilder dont you agree?Last edited by marcus300; 01-09-2007 at 07:54 AM.
-
01-10-2007, 08:11 AM #291Originally Posted by marcus300
DEAD ON THERE MARCUS MATE, COULD NOT AGREE MORE.
I myself have followed the more conventional style cycles until i began reading more and more about PB. After talking to marcus and several other BBer's from other boards (who were associates of pauls) i decided to try PB methods of cycling and training and i can honestly say that both far superseeded my expectations of them.
Paul was an authority on AAS and results speak for themselves, the guy was a monster. I wonder if some of todays gurus will have their work and cycle methods talked about and utilised years after they have gone?
Also his supplement company (dont no wheather or not to post the name?) is still producing some of the best supps around!
TLast edited by BIG_T_MC06; 01-10-2007 at 08:13 AM.
-
01-10-2007, 08:32 AM #292Originally Posted by BIG_T_MC06
some on this board have motives to why they would say such strange remarks and it shows how desperate they are, thankyou for your post just backs up even more
-
01-10-2007, 09:13 AM #293Originally Posted by marcus300
The whole PB statement about determining the stregnth of a persons character by the amount of criticism that comes out of their mouth is relevant here yet again.
I think more people should take the short cycling approach when using AAS, even if it not done at high dose only moderate. I found that the sides decreased when i started short cycles and i feel a whole lot better in myself (mind set/outlook and physique wise) now when both on and off cycles. And as an added bonus for us juicers time off can be decreased when utilising shorter legnth cycles.
several people on here will follow the train of thought "i dont like what i dont know." If everyone were like this then bodybuilders would have not reached the phenominal sizes possible these days.
I challenge any doubters to give 3-5 weeks of thier time to try a well designed, properly structured short cycle, of course the proper preperation must be done (priming) before hand. Keep a log and come back to this thread and see if your views have changed...
TLast edited by BIG_T_MC06; 01-10-2007 at 09:20 AM.
-
01-10-2007, 09:49 AM #294Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Originally Posted by marcus300
Honestly, his ideas are being discussed here, and I think they're idiotic. I am not criticising the man himself, but rather an idea (Short Heavy Cycles) which has no scientific foundation. If we're not here to discuss the idea, then why even post it up?
Im not trying to be negative, but honestly, I think his ideas are terrible, and to then attack me for saying that, call me jealous, or assail my character for presenting valid critique of his ideas only tells me that his ideas don't stand up to valid scrutiny.Last edited by Property of Steroid.com; 01-10-2007 at 09:55 AM.
-
01-10-2007, 10:16 AM #295
Have you ever tried a short heavy cycle anthoy?
-
01-10-2007, 10:24 AM #296Originally Posted by BIG_T_MC06
-
01-10-2007, 10:27 AM #297Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Originally Posted by BIG_T_MC06
-
01-10-2007, 10:33 AM #298Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
-
01-10-2007, 10:42 AM #299Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Originally Posted by Maldorf
I feel that logically (empirically) as well as medically, they don't have a solid foundation for working as well as other types of cycles.
Using the analogy of professional bodybuilders doesn't really work though...they never come off. They increase the dose or change compounds for their contests, but they don't come off at all.
To be fair, I think someone would need to run a short heavy cycle, and then COME OFF, and compare the gains they keep with the gains from a traditional cycle. And they'd also have to see whether their blood work comes back to within acceptable range more quickly...which I suspect would be the same from a short/heavy cycle as with a traditional one.
-
01-10-2007, 10:52 AM #300Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
like ive said i have no motive for saying this, ive got nothing to sell or trying to generate more buisness trying to make BB's believe every word i say,
back to the subject i think
-
01-10-2007, 11:00 AM #301Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Originally Posted by marcus300
PB had guys taking over a bottle per day of anabolics. That's going to make you bigger...then he combined it with Slin, GH, etc, etc...
Here's a hot tip:
Anything will work with those doses.
But it's unsafe, and there's better ways to make the same gains.
-
01-10-2007, 11:06 AM #302Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Originally Posted by marcus300
Or that you can't possibly follow/give terrible advice, because you don't earn money?
Honestly, isn't your criticism of me for earning money on writing about steroids applicable to PB also? I mean...if you can't trust me because I earn a living from writing about steroids and selling products, then logically, you can't trust PB either, right?
-
01-10-2007, 11:16 AM #303Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
I am just the messanger, all the reports/studies/cyclelogs and everyone posting on here tells you something different than what your saying, you contridict yourself allthe time, you say one thing then say another,
i am sorry if i hit a nerve with you but i would rather take it from BB's who have done it and tried it and have reports saying what happened than someone who didnt understand the whole process, ie priming!!
all we are doing is going back and forth, if i have upset in anyway i apoligies but you did say some remarkable comments with little knowledge,
results speak for themself- end of story
-
01-10-2007, 11:19 AM #304Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Originally Posted by marcus300
-
01-10-2007, 11:22 AM #305Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
i am sorry if i hit a nerve with you but i would rather take it from BB's who have done it and tried it and have reports saying what happened than someone who didnt understand the whole process, ie priming!!
all we are doing is going back and forth, if i have upset in anyway i apoligies but you did say some remarkable comments with little knowledge,
results speak for themself- end of story
you want to carry on PM me but i do find it hard to take anything form you on this subject with any credability, and with you carrying on trying to discredit people reports or methods of cycle just shows many thing to me and others,
best of luck to you in your goal
-
01-10-2007, 01:39 PM #306Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
For most people, especially those just starting out, the traditional method of longer cycles works just fine.
-
01-10-2007, 01:52 PM #307Originally Posted by Maldorf
-
01-10-2007, 01:57 PM #308Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Originally Posted by marcus300
-
01-10-2007, 02:09 PM #309Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
I can post bloodwork but to be honest Anthony your only going to say i made them up and are false so its like banging my head on a brick wall with you, you have issues with me because i blow holes in everything you have said and to be honest you amuse me but if you want to carry on going back and forth do it through PM and not on the board pls,
I say again there are to many BB's who claim it works with good results, so if you dont believe them thats fine but your constant trying to pick holes into it as made you look rather daft,
you can say it doesnt work because it does just take one report from warrior, i say good results,
I dont have any motive Anthony to claim anything, i am not trying to sell any magic pills or want to generate more clients,I am not going back and forth because you have been shown wrong and your upset with me, listen i dont want to keep going back and forth so if you want to carry on and need to learn anymore about priming and other things surrounding this give me a PM, i will be happy to help,
But your not winning and am not carrying this stupid argument on, i had many PM's saying exact the same thing about how you are conducting yourself so chill out and move on,if you dont like it fine, but you dont understand the whole thing but ive tried to explain but your tunnel vissioned and there is only one view whats right and thats you, whats wrong with you calm down and get on with your job and educate people on this board or what ever motive you have being here,
-
01-10-2007, 02:15 PM #310Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Originally Posted by marcus300
Once again, lets see proof of HPTA recovery, via SCANNED bloodwork of someone before, during, and post-cycle. All I'm asking for is proof of your claims.
Lets disregard the fact that you don't have anything to sell (irrelevant) and that you think a study is an anecdote....lets see PROOF of your claims. That's all I'm asing for. Stop randomly declaring yourself the "winner" and saying you've shown me to be "wrong" (the people reading the thread can decide for themselves).
Lets see all of this proof you have...scanned bloodwork, and pictures will suffice.
As for the claims made by PB vs/ Dorian....I noticed that Dorian never admitted to working with PB even after he was no longer under contract by Weider.
-
01-10-2007, 02:16 PM #311
Marcus has his theory which has worked well for some people. He does not need to back it up for anyone here. It is not a court of Law!! just a discussion forum where people can air there VIEWS and OPINIONS! No proof required.
-
01-10-2007, 02:18 PM #312Originally Posted by marcus300
I also cannot believe you didnt get Test, free Test, SHBG BW done also Marcus...
-
01-10-2007, 02:18 PM #313Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Originally Posted by perfectbeast2001
-
01-10-2007, 02:21 PM #314
well im going to see if it works buy actually trying it!
-
01-10-2007, 02:23 PM #315Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
pls re-read my previous post,
Am not intrested in agruing with you, you know if i post bloodwork you will say ive made them up or you dont believe it, so what if you dont,
OK Anthony you dont like it ok, its rubbish, it doesnt work, its bad for you, its not worth trying, i know nothing, i made it all up, everything you say is spot on and you know everything happy now
PM if you want to carry on, and let the people on this board soak up whats been posted by warrior and a few others and let them decide if they want to try it or not, am not intrested in your personal amusing comments of hot air
-
01-10-2007, 02:24 PM #316Originally Posted by perfectbeast2001
thankyou
-
01-10-2007, 02:26 PM #317Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Here are Jason Meuller's words (slightly edited for length) on PB's claims that he worked with several other very well-known bodybuilders (all of whom DENIED doing anything PB told them to do). In fact, PB's "credentials" (degrees, people he worked with, pharmacology articles, published medical papers)...have all failed to have been verified by an independant third party! In short...MOST of what PB claimed...seems to have been disputed...he didn't have all of the degrees, scientific background, etc...that anybody who interviewed him was able to confirm!
The day before this article was sent off to be posted, we contacted Ian Harrison by telephone in England to get his comments about some recent claims made on Biohazard849, Paul Borrseson's UK website. Specifically, Borreson is still claiming an association with Ian and claims Ian had nothing to do with the recent breakup. Here's what Ian had to say.
AE: Ian, what is the status of your relationship with Paul Borreson?
Ian: I've split with Paul Borreson and I have no connection with Biohazard UK anymore.
AE: What role will you play, if any, in the future of Biohazard USA?
Ian: My future is most definitely in the USA, and I feel confident I will be working with Trevor Smith.
So that's it folks! Seems something fishy is about with Paul Borreson and Biohazard UK since he still claims a relationship with Ian. You heard it hear first!
Copyright 1999 Jason Meuller and Anabolic Extreme. This material may not be copied, reproduced, or transmitted without the express written permission of the copyright owners.
THE BIOHAZARD USA ARTICLE
THE REAL SITUATION......
IT HAS COME TO BIOHAZARD USA'S ATTENTION THAT WE HAVE BEEN DUPED.....LIED TO, AND BASICALLY MADE TO LOOK LIKE A ****ING FOOL....
BIOHAZARD USA WAS FOUNDED BY IAN HARRISON AND TREVOR SMITH WHO WERE INSPIRED BY THE PRINCIPLES SET FORTH, BUT SELDOM FOLLOWED BY PAUL BORRESEN....DURING THIS PROCESS WE WERE LED TO BELIEVE MANY THINGS...ALL OF WHICH WE HAVE COME TO FIND OUT HAVE BEEN UN-TRUE!!!
HOWEVER, BECAUSE WE BELIEVED IN WHAT WE WERE TOLD AND BECAUSE WE ARE LOYAL PEOPLE, WE DECIDED TO TAKE A BACK SEAT AND LET PAUL BORRESEN HAVE ALL THE CREDIT
THIS, OF COURSE, WILL NO LONGER CONTINUE!!!
AS WE SPEAK THERE ARE A PLETHORA OF LAWSUITS TARGETED AT MR. BORRESEN FOR MAKING UN-SUBSTANTIATED CLAIMS....NOT THE LEAST OF WHICH IS THAT THE GREAT DORIAN YATES IS A DRUG ADDICT.....THIS IS NOT ONLY UNFAIR, BUT DEAD WRONG, ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING THE SOURCE WHO HIMSELF IS KNOWN TO HAVE A LARGE NUMBER OF, SHALL WE SAY, PERSONAL ISSUES...... IT HAS ALSO COME TO OUR ATTENTION THAT PAUL BORRESEN IS MAKING CLAIMS THAT HE IS COACHING LEE PRIEST FOR THE MR. OLYMPIA AND THAT HE PERSONALLY KNOWS LEE USES 3000MG OF GEAR PER DAY!!! WELL UPON SPEAKING TO LEE TO CLEAR SOME THINGS UP HE PROVED THE TYPE OF MAN HE IS BY BASICALLY LAUGHING AT THE WHOLE THING. LET’S FACE IT 3000MG WOULD KILL A ****ING BULL, NOT TO MENTION THAT THERE IS NO REASON TO USE THESE AMOUNTS…..PAUL BORRESEN ALSO STATED THAT LEE EATS 30 BIG MACS A DAY IN THE OFF SEASON AND GETS AWAY WITH THIS BY USING A TON OF INSULIN …..THIS IS ALSO A JOKE SINCE AFTER SPEAKING WITH LEE AND HIS DOCTOR WE FOUND OUT THAT LEE IS HYPO-GLYCEMIC AND NEVER—NOR CAN HE EVER—USE INSULIN….
BOTH TREVOR SMITH AND IAN HARRISON ALONG WITH CHRIS SNEDDON (WHO WERE ALL ON HAND TO CARRY PAUL BORRESEN THROUGH THE USA SEMINAR BECAUSE OF HIS HORRIBLE CONDITION) HAVE NOW SPOKEN WITH BOTH DORIAN YATES AND KERRY KAYES AND ABOUT 30 OTHER PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN LEFT HOLDING THE BAG OF SHIT CREATED BY PAUL BORRESEN
WE WOULD LIKE TO TAKE THE TIME TO APOLOGIZE WHOLE HEARTEDLY FOR ANY SLANDEROUS INFORMATION THAT APPEARED IN OUR WEBSITE IN REGARDS TO DORIAN YATES, CHEMICAL NUTRITION, KERRY KAYES, BRIAN BATCHELDOR T.C. LUOMA AND TESTOSTERONE .NET........AS IT TURNS OUT, THEY HAD EVERY RIGHT TO PULL THE INTERVIEW WITH PAUL BORRESEN DUE TO THE FACT THAT NONE OF HIS CLAIMS COULD BE SUBSTANTIATED---EVEN THOUGH WE WERE ASSURED THAT COPIES OF ALL LITERATURE PUBLISHED AND ALL DEGREES WERE SENT FED-EX TO T.C. LUOMA AT TESTOSTERONE.NET TO VALIDATE PAUL'S CREDENTIALS.... (UNFORTUNATELY THIS WAS SUPPOSED TO BE DONE BY SOMEONE CLAIMING TO BE BOTH A PHARMACOLOGIST, BIOCHEMIST AND NOW A DOCTOR, BUT WHO IS NOT ANY OF THE ABOVE)
IN SHORT, BIOHAZARD USA IS HERE TO STAY HOLDING TRUE TO IT'S PRINCIPLES......WE HAVE NEVER LIED TO ANYONE, BUT UNFORTUNATELY WE HAVE BEEN LIED TO A GREAT NUMBER OF TIMES BY THE VERY PERSON WE WERE TRYING TO PROMOTE........ IT SHOULD ALSO BE MADE KNOWN THAT THE REASON WE HAVE BEEN DELAYED IN HAVING OUR PRODUCTS AVAILABLE IS THAT SEVERAL SHIPMENTS WHICH WERE PRE-PAID FOR WERE NEVER SENT BY PAUL BORRESEN WHO INSTEAD STRUNG US ALONG CLAIMING THEY WERE SENT OR BEING SENT AND THAT IT WAS CUSTOMS FAULT THAT THEY DID NOT GET HERE.....OF COURSE WE RECENTLY FOUND OUT THE PRODUCTS WERE NEVER SHIPPED, BUT THAT THE MONEY SENT FOR THEM WENT INSTEAD INTO MR. BORRESENS POCKET....THIS WAS THE SAME SCENARIO FOR PROMINENT NATIONAL COMPETITOR JUSTIN BROOKES, WHOM BOTH TREVOR AND IAN HELPED IN THE OFF SEASON TO GET TO HIS BIGGEST EVER (293LBS) ONLY TO WATCH A NON-FUNCTIONAL PAUL BORRESEN **** UP HIS WHOLE CONTEST PREP BY NOT SENDING HIS PROGRAMS AND SCREWING HIM OUT OF 800 DOLLARS. THE END RESULT FOR JUSTIN WAS THAT HE WEIGHED IN AT 242LBS.....A FAR CRY FROM THE 265LBS HE SHOULD HAVE CARRIED ON THE STAGE HAD SOMEONE NOT COMPLETELY ****ED HIS ENTIRE CONTEST PREP.....
Stacked to Death" is John Romano’s belated review of the late Paul Borreson’s book, The Stack. Paul lost a great deal of credibility with T- Nation readers a couple years ago after it turned out the academic credentials he touted in an interview with us were false, and his ‘star client,’ Dorian Yates, claimed to have never associated with him. The insane quantities of steroids that Borreson advocates as a "quick fix" for the genetically average totaled up to nearly thirteen grams a week, a cycle he and his clients supposedly thrived on.
Believe who you want, but PB was a F-ing Fraud. He didn't have any of the credentials he claimed to have, nobody followed his advice, and he had nearly no idea what he was talking about.Last edited by Property of Steroid.com; 01-10-2007 at 02:42 PM.
-
01-10-2007, 02:50 PM #318Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
anyway what ever you say Anthony, one last thing TRY IT SEE IF IT WORKS BUT FULLY UNDERSTAND IT FIRST
-
01-10-2007, 02:56 PM #319Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Originally Posted by marcus300
Honestly, I think the proof is all here for anyone who wants to look at it objectively. Several non-connected sources all say that he did not do or have any of the things he said he did. Instead of some grand conspiracy theory, isn't it more likely that he was simply a liar, and a junkie?
-
01-10-2007, 03:03 PM #320Originally Posted by Anthony Roberts
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS