Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 81 to 86 of 86
  1. #81
    Snrf's Avatar
    Snrf is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Snrf 2 - Bojangles 0
    Posts
    5,829
    Quote Originally Posted by Forza Mentale
    somehow, I do not think that anyone was trying to include you that camp....
    What?

  2. #82
    SMYL_GR8's Avatar
    SMYL_GR8 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    1,489
    I am in one of the most heavily populated gay areas in the country and it IS different. They DO gawk at me in the gym (not all, of course, but they make it so obvious when they do) and my patients DO come on to me (men much more than women and with much LESS discretion). They are MUCH more forward than women and much more interested in "physical activity" than any kind of relationship. Like I said, it's parafunctional, contrasurvival and aberrated.

  3. #83
    Tock's Avatar
    Tock is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Fort Worth
    Posts
    4,264
    Quote Originally Posted by SMYL_GR8
    They are MUCH more forward than women and much more interested in "physical activity" than any kind of relationship. Like I said, it's parafunctional, contrasurvival and aberrated.
    Tacky, for sure. I get more than my fair share of come-ons, and while somewhat flattering, it's still basically unwanted and annoying. It's the price for being pretty, I guess . . .

    But parafunctional, contrasurvival and aberrated? I dunno about that. A lot of guys I know do the same thing with women, and they're considered "normal" to other horney guys. I suppose the local First Baptist Church types might consider them parafunctional & etc. along with being sinful.

    Ya gotta admit, though, that looking good is good for your business, yes?

  4. #84
    Tock's Avatar
    Tock is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Fort Worth
    Posts
    4,264
    Here's George Takai's (Sulu on Star Trek) take on the controversy --

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aA20dKc3kK8

    funny . . .

  5. #85
    SMYL_GR8's Avatar
    SMYL_GR8 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    1,489
    Quote Originally Posted by Tock
    Tacky, for sure. I get more than my fair share of come-ons, and while somewhat flattering, it's still basically unwanted and annoying. It's the price for being pretty, I guess . . .

    But parafunctional, contrasurvival and aberrated? I dunno about that. A lot of guys I know do the same thing with women, and they're considered "normal" to other horney guys. I suppose the local First Baptist Church types might consider them parafunctional & etc. along with being sinful.

    Ya gotta admit, though, that looking good is good for your business, yes?
    Good for business? I guess. They do say that the average CEO is almost 6' tall while the average man is 5' 8" and there shouldn't be any correlation. I know plenty of ugly short dentists that outproduce me, but it obviously helps in life in general with that first impression.

    It's contrasurvival b/c men with men can't procreate and the goal of every action of every animal on this planet (including homo sapiens) is geared in one way or another toward procreation.

  6. #86
    Tock's Avatar
    Tock is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Fort Worth
    Posts
    4,264
    Quote Originally Posted by SMYL_GR8
    It's contrasurvival b/c men with men can't procreate and the goal of every action of every animal on this planet (including homo sapiens) is geared in one way or another toward procreation.
    There's a difference between survival of the species and flourishing. Some parts of the planet are woefully overpopulated, limited resources are divided amongst increasing # of people, lowering living standards, in some places increasing misery. One simple and workable way to decrease this problem a few % is to allow people the homosexual option, if they so wish. Fewer babies in places like Mexico City, Sudan, China, the Sahara, Brazil, etc, would releive the burden humans place on resources. As long as it's voluntary, what's the problem? None that I can see . . .

    Ya, too much procreation is not a good thing . . .

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •