Thread: I need/want a handgun
-
02-15-2006, 05:56 PM #121
hes turkishs best friend
-
02-15-2006, 05:59 PM #122New Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Posts
- 1
go with the .45 ONE SHOT ONE KILL
-
02-15-2006, 06:00 PM #123Originally Posted by grim
-
02-15-2006, 06:17 PM #124Originally Posted by Tren Bull
Read that one too, you should get Gun digest? (I think, will check tonite) Glock and "the complete glock reference guide" (you have to see the torture test at the back, worth every penny, you'll never buy another brand of auto again) sold at www.lonewolfdist.com, they also sell everything you would ever want to put on a Glock. Check out glocktalk.com too, lot of neat stuff there.
-
02-15-2006, 06:50 PM #125
yea, ive checked out www.glocktalk.com thats a cool forum. everyone there is like me, obsessed with glocks
-
02-15-2006, 06:52 PM #126Originally Posted by grim
-
02-15-2006, 06:56 PM #127Originally Posted by Tren Bull
You can never have enough of them
-
02-15-2006, 07:06 PM #128
never.... ever
-
02-15-2006, 08:06 PM #129Originally Posted by goodcents
but first i need to buy a stainless s&w .44 mag revolver with a 5 inch barrel.
-
02-15-2006, 08:36 PM #130Originally Posted by grim
fvck i hate explaining this...
the hollywood infamous "One Shot, One Kill" reference refers to snipers, and snipers alone. This is because, after the initial shot, your presence is exposed, a second shot therafter will risk exposing your position. All other forms of tactical shooting is dependant on essentially putting as many accurate rounds down range as possable in order to psychologically destroy enemy morale and produce (relatively) safe oppurtunities for your advance.
Remember, infantry weapons are made with the intention of wounding enemies, not killing them - Sniper teams typically carry .50 Cal LRSR (as appose to the 7.62 m24) now, which pretty well guarntees a targets death. Due to the proximity of a target, if forced into using a pistol (pistols are typically considered "last resort" wpns, with a few exceptions) the handgun should have enough rounds in order to (relatively) safely keep an enemies head down so your fireteam partner can be in a position to cover you, so that you mean reholster, and reload your main weapon.
even the NYPD issue their officers Glock 17's due to their high magazine capacity (and comfortable lightwieght).
-
02-15-2006, 09:11 PM #131
if you run, youll only die tired
-
02-15-2006, 09:19 PM #132Originally Posted by decadbal
-
02-15-2006, 09:20 PM #133Originally Posted by GQ-Bouncer
-
02-15-2006, 09:20 PM #134
with a semi auto .45 its not exactly one shot one kill, its more like 6 shots one gory mutilation.
-
02-15-2006, 09:23 PM #135Originally Posted by decadbal
light infantry, bah... why carry kit when the kit can carry you!
-
02-16-2006, 04:39 AM #136
i enjoy shooing my .45 revolver and my colt elite 10mm.
for personal protection i carry a kel tec 32. $300 bucks new, and only wieghs 8 ounces w/ full clip.
Many Many people carry this gun for their concealed weapon, and many cops have this as an ankle or back up gun
-
02-16-2006, 02:45 PM #137
id like to get an over/under deringer chamberd in either .357 mag or .44 mag. that as an ankle weapon and a glock 30 with hollow tips would work pretty well for self defense.
-
02-17-2006, 12:16 AM #138
just so everyone's clear, and it's official.
I won the .45 vs 9mm debate
-
02-17-2006, 12:23 AM #139Originally Posted by GQ-Bouncer
that may be, but i still love my glock 30
-
02-18-2006, 12:41 PM #140Originally Posted by GQ-Bouncer
The G.I. 45, the sho'nuff 1911 Colt, does indeed have a 7 round capacity. Of course you can also chamber the first round, top off the mag, and have 8. However, there are high capacity 45s on the market. I have a pair of Para-Ordnance P-10s, which are smaller than the colt officer's model, true sub-compacts, that use 10 round mags for a total capacity of 11 rounds. The big sister to the P-10, the P-14 (and the P-12) are full sized and commander sized, respectively with 15 and 13 round capacity, respectively. That is enough for most purposes, I would think, owing to the impressive effectiveness of the 45ACP round. Even with a more traditional 45 cloned from the 1911, or an actual 1911, 7 rounds is gonna be adequate. If you can shoot under pressure, facing one opponent, that leaves you 6 rounds, cause a decently placed shot will, with absolute certainty, take your baddie out of the fight.
The 9mm is just fast enough that you can get some decent expansion, under optimum conditions, with hollow points. Unfortunately, optimum conditions do not always prevail. Expansion and hydrostatic shock are iffy and not to be relied upon, Girlfriend. The nice thing about the 45, 44, and other bigger bore rounds is that they are already making a hole, going in, that is as big as a 9mm makes going out. The 45, in other words, requires no optimum conditions for expansion, since expansion is moot, although many shooters think highly of the Golden Saber and other hollowpoint or frangible rounds. Personally, I prefer a combat load of two Golden Sabers followed by hardball. If the fight progresses to the point where the baddie has cover from a car door or something, or has really heavy clothing on, I want to be able to score a telling shot with a big, heavy bullet that holds together. The initial shot or shots will generally always be face to face, and possibly panic shots, and so the frangible round is good in that it will penetrate fewer walls and stuff in an urban environment.
For the beginning shooter, I would almost want to recommend a 44 snubby. Such a gun is packable, and shooting it is very instinctive, requiring no training to speak of for basic operation of the weapon. Plus, in a hammerless design or with hammer shrouds or a well-bobbed hammer, it can be deployed quite effectively from a jacket pocket, firing right through the jacket. "Hold on, buddy, let me get my wallet from my pocket... and please, point that thing away from me, okay? You are really scaring the shit out of me and I am cooperating... BLAMMO!" Down he goes, capeesh? An old Chief's Special would be a good bet if it is still nice and tight and the bore looks good. If you have a friend who is a shooter, I would recommend a single action .45ACP or clone thereof. The COlt Defender is a very nice and reliable little gun for under $500 new. It is basically just an Officer's Model that has been dressed up by the factory for concealed carry. I would stay away from double actions, due to the long, creepy, heavy trigger pull vs the single actions. Learn to properly operate a single action semiauto, and you will have no regrets carrying it or using it.
This is all assuming your needs are self defense related. For just plinking at cans or punching holes in paper, a 22 can be a lot of fun. If you can find a decent Colt Woodsman, (highly sought after by collectors and not made in many years) in decent condition, you will thoroughly enjoy your backyard shootouts with the tin can gang. There are plenty more full sized 22s but the Woodsman is a favorite.
If you decide to go with a 44 magnum revolver, remember that you can also fire 44 specials from it, reducing your shooting costs and the recoil of the weapon. The Ruger Super Blackhawk is a very comfy 44 mag to shoot if it is just to be used for target, plinking, or hunting. This is a single action revolver, requiring the shooter to manually cock the hammer before each shot. For defensive purposes, a double action revolver has a huge advantage, but the plow handle grip on the single action is much more comfy at the range. You can shoot a couple of boxes from the Blackhawk with about the same degree of hand trauma as you get from shooting a half box from the Super Redhawk, Ruger's double action offering. A 44 of whatever stripe is a good car gun. It is nicely intimidating and quite powerful, and very accurate in a full size model. It just isn't something you would want to carry on your hip.
You can do a lot with your $500. Whatever you buy, you are likely to keep it and use it for a long time, so take your time in your selection. Shoot a bunch of different guns and get an idea of you preferences and needs and capabilities.
Love
Anna
-
02-18-2006, 12:57 PM #141Originally Posted by Tren Bull
Love
Anna
-
02-18-2006, 01:19 PM #142Originally Posted by GQ-Bouncer
Love
Anna
-
02-18-2006, 03:07 PM #143
look at anna, on top of it.. wheni was in academy we werent allowed to use the terms dbl tap... nor were the instructors... even tho its the best method to stop a target
-
02-18-2006, 04:21 PM #144Originally Posted by Anna Bollick
"aimed shot to the head" would refer to 'confirmation shot', which is done after all enemies (w/discretion of course) have been incapacitated, this is more of a humane reason to ensure they stop suffering.
I am issued a pistol because i'm a the platoon MGer (m240), i'd rather have a more lightwieght 9mm than a low cap .45. Especially during FIBUA(MOUT) training. Also, we have to hump all the ammo for our main wpn, so the less wieght the better.
As far as being a police officer, i could only assume the Glock would be the best wpn of choice due to low-profile, lightwieght, comfort, mag cap, but i'm not a policeman, so i'm just guessing
-
02-18-2006, 04:31 PM #145
glock... no exposed hammer... i dont like the lack of control..
-
02-18-2006, 05:49 PM #146
here's an example of the military use of a pistol - (browning hi-power, 9mm)
http://qyrang.org/photos/Gun%20Camp%...d/100_0873.mov
(canadian forces)
LOL, i just found some blackwater instructional video, looks pretty good
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...71363&q=pistolLast edited by GQ-Bouncer; 02-18-2006 at 06:24 PM.
-
02-19-2006, 03:12 PM #147
good, looks like i won the 9mm vs .45 debate
-
02-19-2006, 04:14 PM #148Originally Posted by Jenseno9
-
02-19-2006, 07:02 PM #149Originally Posted by decadbal
yea, thats the only thing i dont like about glocks. its a very bad idea to carry it with a round in the chamber. apparently, lots of police officers were having problems with their glocks going off in their holsters.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS