-
-
11-11-2008, 08:30 PM #202
Why can I not log on to this site using Firefox at the moment????
-
-
11-11-2008, 08:37 PM #204~ Vet~ I like Thai Girls
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Asia
- Posts
- 12,114
-
11-11-2008, 08:38 PM #205Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Posts
- 3,435
How, since all the events in history have occurred in a particular order that led to the present? Therefore you would already be a part of history.
If it was possible to change the present by going back to the past, would it be possible to kill one of your parents to prevent your birth and if that was possible than how would you have gone back to the past to actually accomplish killing one of them?
-
11-11-2008, 08:51 PM #206
^^good point
-
11-11-2008, 08:57 PM #207
-
11-11-2008, 09:00 PM #208
dsm pm me
-
11-11-2008, 09:30 PM #209
Originally Posted by Blome
How, since all the events in history have occurred in a particular order that led to the present? Therefore you would already be a part of history.
If it was possible to change the present by going back to the past, would it be possible to kill one of your parents to prevent your birth and if that was possible than how would you have gone back to the past to actually accomplish killing one of them?
I'd love to see DSM have a proper comeback/argument to this.
-
11-11-2008, 09:33 PM #210Anabolic Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Posts
- 3,435
^^sounds kinda like Donnie Darko.
-
11-11-2008, 09:36 PM #211
if a woodchuck could chuck wood
and the woodchuck got a wood
where would the woodchuck chuck his wood?
-
11-11-2008, 09:47 PM #212
-
11-11-2008, 09:49 PM #213
WTF does DSM stand for?
-
11-11-2008, 09:52 PM #214
-
11-11-2008, 09:57 PM #215
dsm=dick sucking man/male
-
11-11-2008, 10:38 PM #216
ummm..
-
-
11-11-2008, 10:47 PM #218
LIAR!
This thread is a waste!!!
-
Woodchucks Chucking Wood
This is difficult to question answer. The amount of wood that woodchucks would chuck on a given day varies greatly with the individual woodchuck. According to a Wall Street Journal article, New York State wildlife expert Richard Thomas found that a woodchuck could chuck around 35 cubic feet of dirt in the course of digging a burrow. Thomas reasoned that if a woodchuck could chuck wood, he would chuck an amount equal to 700 pounds.
Some say it depends on three factors:
* The woodchuck's desire to chuck said wood.
* The woodchuck's need to chuck the aforementioned wood.
* The woodchuck's ability to chuck the wood.
Others say:
* He would chuck, he would, as much as he could, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
* If he could chuck wood, the woodchuck would chuck as much as he could!
* A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
* A woodchuck would chuck all the wood that the woodchuck would chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
* If a woodchuck could chuck wood, he would and should chuck wood. But if woodchucks can't chuck wood, they shouldn't and wouldn't chuck wood. Though were I a woodchuck, and I chucked wood, I would chuck wood with the best woodchucks that chucked wood.
* If a woodchuck could chuck wood, then s/he'd chuck all the wood, s/he'd chuck and chuck and chuck and chuck, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
* It would chuck the amount of wood that she sells seashells on the seashore divided by how many pickles Peter Piper picks.
* One quarter of a sycamore if you give him a quarter for every quarter of the sycamore he cut.
* It might depend on how many female woodchucks were present. Or, it could depend on whether the woodchuck's mother-in-law was around or not. If she was, he'd be chucking all day. If not, he'd be watching the football game.
* Some maintain that woodchucks could not and would not chuck wood at all.
* It depends on how good his dentures are!
* A woodchuck, would chuck, as much wood, as a woodchuck, could chuck, If a woodchuck could chuck wood. But unfortunately, woodchucks do not chuck wood.
* About 5.72 fluid litres of wood
* About as many boards as the Mongol hoards would hoard if the Mongol hordes did hoard boards.
* Um....... 23????
* Tons. More than you can count. Honestly. No one can chuck more would than a woodchuck.
* If the woodchucks name was Maurice, then it could chuck all the wood that it wants to. However, if its name is Frank, no chucking would be for it.
* Due to the average size of a wood chuck and the general density of wood (not including cork) if a wood chuck could chuck wood it would probably get through about 6.573 pounds per day, assuming the wood chuck is functioning correctly.
* Using the formula: (W + I) * C where W = the constant of wood, which is well known to be 61, as agreed in many scientific circles. I = the variable in this equation, and stands for the word "if" from the original problem. As there are three circumstances, with 0 equaling the chance that the woodchuck cannot chuck wood, 1 being the theory that the woodchuck can chuck wood but chooses not to, and 2 standing for the probability that the woodchuck can and will chuck wood, we clearly must choose 2 for use in this equation. C = the constant of Chuck Norris, whose presence in any problem involving the word chuck must there, is well known to equal 1.1 of any known being, therefore the final part of this calculation is 1.1. As is clear, this appears to give the answer of (61 + 2) * 1.1 = (63) * 1.1 = 69.3. However, Chuck Norris' awesome roundhouse kick declares that all decimal points cannot be used in formulas such as this, and so it must be rounded to the final solution of 69 units of wood.
-
11-11-2008, 10:52 PM #220
PWO dextrose or Malto?
-
11-11-2008, 10:56 PM #221
Why do ground hogs see shadows, wood chucks chuck wood, and beavers become slang for vagina but their all the same exact animal?
How is this possible? What does wood, shadows and vagina all have in common?
-
11-11-2008, 11:13 PM #222
...
-
11-11-2008, 11:20 PM #223
I have your answer DSM....
If you killed one of your parents....whoever was not killed of the two would still lend to you being concieved (provided they ever concieved another child) with another person...
You would still exist...just 1/2 of your orriginal self..the other half would be caracteristic of the other party responsible in your conception....
-
11-11-2008, 11:29 PM #224
-
11-11-2008, 11:38 PM #225
-
11-11-2008, 11:38 PM #226
just a shot in the dark...
-
How did this thread get so big?
-
11-11-2008, 11:45 PM #228
Everyone knows DSM and for the most part everyone likes him...
Plus, hes ALWAYS funnier than shit...
-
11-11-2008, 11:54 PM #229
agreed
-
11-12-2008, 12:15 AM #230~ Vet~ I like Thai Girls
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- Asia
- Posts
- 12,114
-
11-12-2008, 12:31 AM #231
It could mean many things
Dead Sexy Male
Dick sucking male
Dumb stupid male
Do suck me
Dont suck me
Damn Smart Male
Dont Shoot Mom
Do Shoot Mom
Devil Sucks Mangina
Dave Shits M&M's
Donkey Suck Me
Donkey Sucking Me
Donkey Soakes Me
Dong Sprays Me
Damn Squirley Maggot
D1ck Sh1t Mommy
Dildo Slap Me
Dildo Stroking Me
Devil Stroking Me
Dave Strokes Me
Dad Strokes Mom
Dad Sucks Mom
Duck Suck Muck
DSM Sucks Mulciber (lol)
D1ck Sh1t Mother****er
D1ck Sh1t MMMMMMMMM
Dildo Slippery Monkey
D1ck shit monkey
D1ck sucking monkey
and the list goes on....
But the mystery remains
-
11-12-2008, 12:46 AM #232
-
11-12-2008, 12:46 AM #233
-
11-12-2008, 12:50 AM #234
I've always thought DSM was just BDSM without the "bondage", that kinky monkey.
-
11-12-2008, 12:57 AM #235
-
-
11-12-2008, 06:01 AM #237
-
-
11-12-2008, 06:18 AM #239
-
11-12-2008, 07:26 AM #240
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 10 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 10 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
11-11-2024, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS