Results 281 to 320 of 526
-
05-18-2005, 11:05 AM #281Originally Posted by dirtyvegas
-
05-18-2005, 11:06 AM #282Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Stop the flames. I don't want to lock a thread that I suppose may have some potential....
-
05-18-2005, 11:07 AM #283
Just read this, I'm not really gonna flame so I edited it. But he is correct if you take the complete opposite.
Hmmm maybe I should try a fina/deca cycle. I bet that won't shut my HPTA down 100%. Yea right.
-
05-18-2005, 11:07 AM #284
Good Goin
AND YES PUTTING YOUR FACE ON THE NET WAS NOT A SMART THING TO DO ESPECIALLY TO TELL EVERYONE WHAT UNIVERSITY YOU ATTENDED,,LOTS OF PEEPS COULD FIND OUT EVERYTHING ABOUT YOU NOW.. GEEEE...
Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
-
05-18-2005, 11:10 AM #285
Ok Im Done With The Comments But Just Cause Im A Newbie Here And Havent Done Any Juice And Dont Have Like 5 Thousand Post Dont Mean That Im A Dumb Ass When It Comes To Bb Or Gear .i Like This Forum Alot Also This Thread...
-
05-18-2005, 11:10 AM #286Originally Posted by dirtyvegas
-
05-18-2005, 11:12 AM #287Originally Posted by roidattack
-
05-18-2005, 11:16 AM #288Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
I suppose...at least Ross is making an effort....he's doing alot of silly things (i.e. comparing an injectable to orals, and just kind of brushing off the issue of sexual side effects, as well as not posting any studies to back up his claims)....
But lets keep the flames down...I got 10 reports on this thread this hour alone...
-
05-18-2005, 11:28 AM #289Writer
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,733
Everyone:
When I came here 1/2 a year ago as a mod...I was saying tons of different stuff also...I was telling everyone that weeks on/off was a bogus way to run clen , I was telling everyone not to use ECA while off clen to upgrade receptors...and I was the first person here (or anywhere) to discover and reccomend the use of Benadryl to upgrade your beta-2 receptors. Now everyone on this board and most others use Benadryl, and run clen the way I suggested...even though I met alot of resistence at first...
So...
We can't automatically dismiss this kid because he is suggesting something new....hell, it's what I did and what I still do!
But...
I always post studies and give you references to check my work, and see if I'm right. Ross hasn't posted one study backing up any of his claims. Until he does, there's really no reason to believe him. I don't.
-
05-18-2005, 11:34 AM #290
well if there is one sure thing we can learn from all these replies, is that a common side effect, regardless of using test or not, is roid rage
-
05-18-2005, 11:36 AM #291Originally Posted by rfbulletdude
-
05-18-2005, 11:37 AM #292
alright. Dirty Vegas you can take a vacation and come back whenyou know how to act on the board. It is the internet for pete's sake. Just relax... take a nice 10 day vacation and come back when you are ready to chill.
If there is any more bickering or flaming going on the next person will join dirty vegasabstrack@protonmail.com
-
05-18-2005, 11:39 AM #293Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
Meso is always a common ****ing denominator between 2 people. Look at some of his previous post he always starts shit with someone else. That is why meso = slut!
-
05-18-2005, 11:40 AM #294Originally Posted by dirtyvegas
muppet!!!!!
-
05-18-2005, 11:52 AM #295Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 448
ok
FIRST of all..LOL..my FIRST NAME is ROSS...not my last....Secondly..those pics are not NEW, and they HARDLY do MY BODY JUSTICE. Ill garuntee that in a picture that displays my shoulders, back and arms, you will all be impressed. I will do my best to get them up ASAP
ALSO....people keep saying "TREN IS MORE SUPRESSIVE THAN TEST"...well NOT if it is used for ONLY 2 weeek periods!!
-
05-18-2005, 11:53 AM #296Originally Posted by tbrocato
-
05-18-2005, 11:54 AM #297Originally Posted by TheMindOfRoss
-
05-18-2005, 11:54 AM #298Originally Posted by Mesomorphyl
Truth hurts huh ?
-
05-18-2005, 11:56 AM #299Originally Posted by TheMindOfRoss
thats cool post more pics and show the haters!
-
05-18-2005, 11:57 AM #300
Yes more pics of you at 210 instead of 175, this time block out your face andy and if you have any recent tatoos block them out... well you might not have to on the tatoos if they are not logged into a database. But at least we get to see 19" arms... Mine are 18" with like 10% more bf than you and I thought my arms were big.
Last edited by Mesomorphyl; 05-18-2005 at 12:00 PM.
-
05-18-2005, 11:58 AM #301
-
05-18-2005, 11:59 AM #302Originally Posted by hooker
-
05-18-2005, 12:01 PM #303Originally Posted by roidattack
hell yah I totaly agree. If you are that serious begin doing your on research and get that shit published!
-
05-18-2005, 12:01 PM #304Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 1,071
Originally Posted by abstrack
-
05-18-2005, 12:04 PM #305Originally Posted by TheMindOfRoss
-
05-18-2005, 12:07 PM #306
Ok, here it goes... I apologize to anyone that got their feelings hurt by me at some point and time. I will be the FIRST to SAY I am SORRY. But can we PLEASE not TYPE in this FASHION anymore. It seemingly is GIVING me a HEADACHE. Peace to all.
-
05-18-2005, 12:08 PM #307Originally Posted by Whoisdamanabstrack@protonmail.com
-
05-18-2005, 12:11 PM #308Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 448
mutated
I think this thread has MUTATED, from an EXPLANATION of WHY TEST is not PERFECT for EVERYONE in EVERY CYCLE, to an argument about TEST ALTOGETHER.
TEST is great, as I said before. I just don't believe it HAS to be the BASE of EVERY cycle--some cycles, not ALL. I believe that EXCESS testosterone use is due in part it's LOW price, high availability, and ADDICTIVE qualities. It is indeed very tempting and very gratifying to ADD TEST to every cycle...but is it THE SAFEST? (for THOSE who care), and is it REALLY THEMOST EFFECTIVE?
I also believe in 2 week, 3week, 4 week, 6 week, and 8 week cycles.
I also beleieve in LOW DOSAGES and a diversity of compounds.
These are the only thoughts I am trying to provoke.
NO ONE is going to DIE from one of my 4 week DBOL /VAR CYCLES.....
-
05-18-2005, 12:12 PM #309Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 448
sorry
ok..no more CAPS..i get the pic...SORRY!
-
05-18-2005, 12:13 PM #310Originally Posted by TheMindOfRoss
-
05-18-2005, 12:17 PM #311
He's not bashing test, only saying there are other ways of doing things, and that just because a cycle does not include test does not make it no good. Or at least this is what I gathered from it. Good to see this thread is back to a nice civil discussion.
-
05-18-2005, 12:21 PM #312Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 448
Originally Posted by Cmore
-
05-18-2005, 12:25 PM #313
I'm still waiting for these studies to back your claims up, then, and only then will I believe you.
-
05-18-2005, 12:40 PM #314Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 448
Originally Posted by bigswiftos
I still don't understand WHICH studies you want. I searched PUb-MED and could not pull up the study demonstrating Testosterone supplementation decreased PLASMA test levels and LH/FSH by nearly 100%, whereas Dianabol only supressed LH 60% used in HIGH DOSAGES. I WILL FIND IT--as I have seen it. Furthermore, it has been shown that testosterone inhibition occurs more rapidly, due to the negative feedback loop that testosterone almost immediately triggers.
What is it that you don't BELIEVE? that TEST is more supressive? That SHORT cycles are SAFER? That LOW DOSAGES ARE EFFECTIVE? What exactly should I clear up?
-
05-18-2005, 12:53 PM #315What exactly should I clear up?
-
05-18-2005, 12:55 PM #316
show me some studies and i will be the first person to try youre theorys, science normally dont lie
-
05-18-2005, 12:59 PM #317Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 448
studies
Originally Posted by wilthepill123
The only studies that are relevant are the ones that indicate how SUPRESSIVE testosterone is, especially compared to other mild anabolics.
And, anecdotal evidence from myself, and plenty more who have PMed me letting me know that they have shared similar positive experiences using some of the cycling schemes and ideas I have outlined. Most are simply scared to speak out against popular opinion--HELL, newbies are SCARED to ask about not using test in fear of being flamed.
I am happy to see A-R becoming more of a place to exchange information.
-
05-18-2005, 01:00 PM #318
I hope Hooker reads this thread and sets you straight Ross. You've lost any potential respect that you could have from older members and are leading newer members down the wrong path.
-
05-18-2005, 01:05 PM #319Associate Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Location
- san antonio/houston
- Posts
- 227
i think that when u first start using AAS that using short cycles and low dosages are fine...as for the test issue i think that u should use test for most cycles but u dont need it in all cycles as he states...i myself ran eq, winny(injectable) cycle with great results in hardness and vascularity and gained close to a solid 10-12 lbs
-
05-18-2005, 01:05 PM #320Originally Posted by TheMindOfRoss
Testosterone use is a well recognized dogma for a reason. It's tried and true effectiveness has been well known in the community since its introduction. If you are trying to disprove a commonly held belief YOU (thats right i can use caps to fag) are going to have to prove it to us with studies to back up your information.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS