Results 321 to 360 of 526
-
05-18-2005, 01:07 PM #321Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 448
Hooker
Originally Posted by wilthepill123
I am not saying MY way is the ONLy way. Simply--ANOTHER way. And furthermore, if anything, my advice is on teh SAFE side--LOW DOSAGES, MILD COMPOUNDS, SHORT CYCLES...
I am not harming anyone....
A gram of test is simply more dangerous than 40mgs of var, or 20mgs of dianabol (even 50!) or 500mgs of Primo. Dangerous, meaning greater chance of side effects.
-
05-18-2005, 01:13 PM #322
You're in good shape i'll admit that, but you have the body of a Calvin Klein model and it can be achieved without any assistance of steroids . You're 185 pounds and claim to be a steroid Guru? You're wrong. Dan Duchaine, L Rea, Bill Roberts. These are steroid gurus, all who know from experience that Test is best. Ill agree that some of your cycles work to an extent, if you want to look like a faggy Abercrombie and Fitch model, but for anything other than trying to look good for girls you're cycles arent worth shit.
-
05-18-2005, 01:18 PM #323Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 448
Originally Posted by wilthepill123
Why have I lost respect because I offer an alternative viewpoint? I am not saying MY way is the ONLY way--just ANOTHER way.
You are NOT READING my posts--TEST is GREAT--test is KING.
Obviosuly testosterone is effective. NOT EVERYONE has the same goals. NOT EVERYONE wants to be AS BIG AS POSSIBLE, with little regard for safety issues. Some people are VERY CAUTIOUS. Some people are WILLING to SPEND MORE MONEY on more expensive drugs! Like I said, part of the reason it is ABUSED is due to its LOW price and HIGH availability--and its addictive qualities. Also, there are OTHER effective drugs.
-
05-18-2005, 01:20 PM #324Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 448
Originally Posted by wilthepill123
NEW PICS ARE COMING...the ones posted are OUTDATED and served ONLY as a TEMPORARY FIX for those who were QUESTIONING my AUTHENTICITY! I am currently 210, 6% BF. I am NOT A CK model. I am a bodybuilder.
-
05-18-2005, 01:22 PM #325
It never fails huh right....
..'bout every month, month and a something gets stirred up. weathered it be in the lounge or right here...i just basically read cause i'm always learning something new..But I'm more likely to go with the opinions of the vets, peeps thats been here for 2+ yrs or so..But I am thinking about a EQ/Deca cycle..and I know someone on here has tried it with great results::thus supporting the theroy of test doesn't have to be in every cycle...(although I'd run a low dose test with that eq/deca cycle)...see everything always changes...
-
05-18-2005, 01:32 PM #326Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 448
Buill Roberts
"Is there any use for HCG in a 2 week cycle"
http://www.t-nation.com/readTopic.do...ydra?id=201478
AND
MORE WITH BILL AND SHORT CYCLES
http://www.t-nation.com/readTopic.do...ydra?id=178632
"
HTPA Shutdown in over 2 weeks
http://www.t-nation.com/readTopic.do...ydra?id=237163
-
05-18-2005, 01:36 PM #327
I could probably grow off dog shit if I ate enough of it but does that make it right? Great advice...
-
05-18-2005, 01:38 PM #328Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 448
and more evidence
here we go....Im on a roll!
[Dear Bill,
You have mentioned being in favor of "shorter" steroid cycles to avoid suppression, and side effects. Could you give some examples of what you mean by the term "shorter"?
Dave
Two weeks on with short acting esters and orals, and four weeks off in between, using Clomid throughout and, if using aromatizable drugs, an antiaromatase while on those drugs.
I was thinking about 4 week cycles, one every 12 weeks with 8 weeks off between.
There is a special advantage to 2 weeks, because in the first two weeks of high androgen levels, pituitary response to LR releasing hormone (LHRH) not only does not decrease, it actually improves. After the two week point, the pituitary rapidly becomes fairly unresponsive to LHRH. Thus, both the hypothalamus (which produces LHRH) and the pituitary, which produces LH, must recover from inhibition.
As long as that is occurring anyway I am not sure that one might as well not go 6 or 8 weeks. Moderate length cycles like that are well proven. So is the 2 weeks on / 4 weeks off plan, although on far fewer subjects. The results of 4 weeks on are not known to me.]
-
05-18-2005, 01:40 PM #329Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 448
Are we getting anywhere>
Are we getting anywhere?
I sure hope so.
-
05-18-2005, 01:58 PM #330Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 448
Lat spread from 1 month ago
Lat spread....new ones coming...
-
05-18-2005, 02:18 PM #331
Hate to say it but I haven't seen a picture in this forum that looks as good as any of the guys in the Olympic 100 m final......especially Mo Greene
-
05-18-2005, 02:24 PM #332Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 448
recent
This was at the beginning of my recent Var cycle.
-
05-18-2005, 02:36 PM #333
not a flame but ur back needs work.....
-
05-18-2005, 02:37 PM #334Originally Posted by TheMindOfRoss
-
05-18-2005, 02:46 PM #335Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 448
Originally Posted by BlInDsIdE
-
05-18-2005, 02:46 PM #336
you look good, but I find it hard to believe youre 210 lbs. A guy I work with who is sitting next to me looks almost exactly like you and he weighs 185.
-
05-18-2005, 02:47 PM #337Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 448
For the record...
I completely apologize if I came off like a know-it-all. I am just very eager to share some of my experiences with people on the board--especially when I see so many posts about lost sex drive or gyno/hairloss. You guys know for yourselves if you have Gyno, or erection problems, or hairloss. I know, and anyone who has seen my pictures knows, that I am completely healthy. I only want everyone to be able to enjoy this GREAT lifestyle--but to do it in a way that is safe and responsible.
I am sorry if I was rude, or offended anyone in anyway, in my relentless persuit of knowledge.
You guys are cool as shit.
-
05-18-2005, 02:49 PM #338Originally Posted by TheMindOfRoss
-
05-18-2005, 02:51 PM #339Originally Posted by longhorn814
I agree i was gonna say he weights around 180
-
05-18-2005, 02:52 PM #340Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 448
2 weeks ago
I think this one is nice...
-
05-18-2005, 02:57 PM #341Originally Posted by TheMindOfRoss
-
05-18-2005, 02:59 PM #342
ehh u r pretty cut, i'll give u that i'd say ur about 185 190
-
05-18-2005, 03:00 PM #343Originally Posted by bigswiftos
-
05-18-2005, 03:01 PM #344Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 448
This MISSING 10 lbs
Originally Posted by BlInDsIdE
-
05-18-2005, 03:03 PM #345Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 448
Bf%
Also..gotta remember...BF%! Have you ever been 6%? Weight can be decieveing....If I had some fat on me, Id be heavier.
-
05-18-2005, 03:09 PM #346
I am 6.8%
-
05-18-2005, 03:25 PM #347
Ive looked at your pictures and my little brother is bigger and more cut he's 23 about 240 6'4 and has never touched any kind of juice of any kind..Your results could have been acheived without AS..Iam not saying you look bad..Quite the opposite you have worked hard or have outstanding genetics, you look good bro..But what about me at 250 5'9 or my boys at the gym that are pushing 300lb's a peice and run test at a gram a wk/ minimum..Do you think thats possible with your var/d-boll cycle,let me answer that for you...NO it is not...
-
05-18-2005, 03:32 PM #348
aaahhhh...........................America!
-
05-18-2005, 03:37 PM #349Originally Posted by KINGKONG
-
05-18-2005, 03:40 PM #350Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- FL
- Posts
- 448
Originally Posted by KINGKONG
Your brother is 23, and 6'4, while I am 21, 5'10. YOU are HOW OLD, how many YEARS training? I am Benching almost 300 at MY WEIGHT. And YES, ARNOLD got to 240 by running d-bol/var, dbol /primo cycles, SO YOU COULD TOO. By the time I AM 24, I WILL BE 240! I COULD NOT BE over 200lbs at 5'10 by 21 YEARS OLD--without the help of anabolics. I trained relelntlessly for 6 years and I maxed out at 180.
You should PM me...I coul dwork out a very efective cycle for you..and you could be cycling MORE OFTEN! WITH MORE PERMANANT GAINS.
-
05-18-2005, 03:40 PM #351Originally Posted by 4spain
J/k run whatever you want or makes you grow...I like it when heads turn when I walk in a room.220 pounds is certainly not a small guy..But in a given place is he the biggest guy on the premesis,NO..I like being that guy...
-
05-18-2005, 03:46 PM #352Originally Posted by KINGKONG
-
05-18-2005, 03:46 PM #353Originally Posted by TheMindOfRoss
back isnt impressive........we're still waiting for the leg pictures........
-
05-18-2005, 03:50 PM #354Originally Posted by TheMindOfRoss
-
05-18-2005, 03:52 PM #355Originally Posted by 4spain
-
05-18-2005, 03:57 PM #356Originally Posted by KINGKONG
-
05-18-2005, 04:04 PM #357Originally Posted by 4spain
-
05-18-2005, 04:07 PM #358
Thanks everyone! I am officially done with this thread. I will never look at it again!
-
05-18-2005, 04:11 PM #359Associate Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Location
- NJ
- Posts
- 447
Originally Posted by TheMindOfRoss
-
05-18-2005, 04:14 PM #360
heres my take on this whole thing... you have limited experience... you think that your few cycles will continue to give you good results... imo, you have very little experience, and don't understand diminishing marginal returns... i would bet that u COULD gain some keepable gains with a dbol var cycle, but i would ALSO bet that the marginal gains from that cycle would decrease MUCH MORE rapidly than a cycle with test...
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS