-
-
06-04-2013, 02:59 AM #482
-
-
06-04-2013, 04:41 AM #484Banned
- Join Date
- May 2013
- Location
- Kiev, Ukraine
- Posts
- 175
If the lab range represents 95% of results (I don't know which percentile they are using) then I'd be in the bottom 1%. I wouldn't call that 'slightly lower' than normal.
I have seen a few doctors over the years regarding poor sleep, low energy, impaired mental ability, and just low QOL. They just gave me a standard blood panel and when everything came back ok, they shrugged. Then I discovered on my own that my Test and HGH levels were low, and that this could explain my symptoms. I am hoping that restoring these hormones to optimal values will improve my QOL in various ways. It is also healthier to be close to optimal values, as being low in these hormones can lead to many effects such as osteoporosis, early death, etc.
-
06-04-2013, 04:46 AM #485
-
06-04-2013, 04:48 AM #486Banned
- Join Date
- May 2013
- Location
- Kiev, Ukraine
- Posts
- 175
-
06-04-2013, 04:52 AM #487
-
That's why I'm starting at such a low dosage bro. To mitigate the joint pain. I'm not doing it anytime soon. I feel good again tho no joint pain.
-
06-04-2013, 06:23 AM #489
Marcus!
Pinning 4iu growth , I always go back and forth as to pin in the AM and PM.. Am would blunt cortisol but at night I feel this is when we repair grow etc..
Also that being said would 2iu in am then 2 pm work or would you just pop all 4 at once.
-
06-04-2013, 07:03 AM #490
Something for you to think about,
There are many ways to administrate gh and ive tried and tested many of them. The suppression comes from elevated IGF levels which last hours so if you are using gh for long periods of time your natural gh pulse is going to be blunted anyway. You also got to understand that there is a reason why the largest natural gh pulse is at night and how large is this pulse if the average man is producing lets says 1.5ius daily. So if your taking exogenous hgh at reasonable dose your natural gh is going to be suppressed and even if it wasn't suppressed its not worth saving anyway because you don't produce enough even if your night time pulse was half of your daily hgh output. So if all the growth factors and benefits happen during REM when our largest pulse is activated then why not follow your natural body's rhythm and inject the largest amount at night to get the most benefits out of your exogenous hgh.
-
06-04-2013, 07:10 AM #491Originally Posted by marcus300
For some reason I always liked pinning before bed and as of now I will take my 4iu at night..
Thanks Marcus .
-
06-04-2013, 07:13 AM #492
-
06-04-2013, 07:21 AM #493Originally Posted by marcus300
-
06-04-2013, 11:36 AM #494Junior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- So. Cal
- Posts
- 125
I wear a sleep monitor that calculates light vs deep sleep. I've noticed that when I pin at night my sleep is much deeper. Just for that i pin an hour before bed.
-
What's the difference between light and deep sleep? Is deep just rem sleep and light does not have any rem activity?
-
Originally Posted by marcus300
-
Originally Posted by AnabolicDoc
-
06-04-2013, 01:56 PM #498
I have a article which I will post when I get chance to search for it on my other computer what's states the best dose would be
6-8ius a day split into two doses and I think its stressed that you should have 5 -7 hours inbetween injections. One being at night time. It makes really good reading.
If your hgh protocol is working stick with it, why change if your getting results. On a personal note I would prefer two injection per day.
be a total six to eight IU a day divided into two doses and having those five to seven hours apart. For example, a dose (either three or four IU) can be taken post training with another three to four IU dose before bed or during the night sleeping period."
-
06-04-2013, 01:57 PM #499
-
Originally Posted by marcus300
-
06-04-2013, 02:34 PM #501
When I ran eod and e3d high dose it was on a heavy burst cycle, so I wouldn't run it like that on trt and you shouldn't be running a high dose anyway on trt. The best results for tissue growth are when you mix hgh with aas the synergy is remarkable but if your off cycle and just running trt then you should be around 4 ius IMHO.
There are many ways to run hgh, ive been running it lately ed for months now even on cycle, I only did eod and e3d when I was bulking heavy and wanted to gain serious muscle tissue.
-
06-04-2013, 03:32 PM #502
-
06-05-2013, 04:22 AM #503
Interesting study I found on my computer what you guys may enjoy reading, also confirms some of the things ive been expressing over the last few posts. Study also shows positive results running high dose EOD protocol's
Body composition response to exogenous GH during training in highly conditioned adults, D. M. Crist, J Appl Physiol 65: 579-584, 1988
Intro:
The effects of biosynthetic methionyl-human growth hormone (met-hGH) on body composition and endogenous secretion of growth hormone (GH) and insulin -like growth factor I (IGF-I) were studied in eight well-trained exercising adults between 22 and 33 yr of age for 6 weeks.
Dosing & Administration:
The met-hGH (experimental) treatment consisted of 8.0 mg (2 U/mg) per week of methGH (Protropin; Genentech, San Francisco, CA), which was divided into three doses (2.67 mg/dose) and delivered on alternate days (3 days/wk) in 0.5 ml of bacteriostatic diluent. Because of differences in the body weights of the subjects, the relative dose range varied between 0.03 and 0.05 mg/kg per injection. Injections were given between 0800 and 1500, and their delivery was rotated among four to six sites throughout the study period. Treatments were administered on a double-blind basis with neither the experimental subject nor the person administering the injections knowing which treatment was being delivered. The total weekly dose of met-hGH used in this study (8.0 mg) was considered supraphysiological, since the spontaneous release of human GH during a 24-h period is purportedly -0.68 mg (4.8 mg/wk) in men and 0.79 mg (5.5 mg/wk) in women (30), similar to amounts reported by others (6).
CONCLUSION
In the present study, we found that alternate-day treatment with met-hGH altered body composition in highly conditioned, exercising adults by increasing FFW (fat free weight), decreasing %fat, and increasing FFW (fat free weight)/FW (fat weight). These changes were significantly greater than those produced by exercise alone.
...
Moreover we found that supraphysiological amounts of met-hGH were sufficient to significantly elevate circulating concentrations of IGF-I in all our subjects, confirming that the changes in body composition were indeed due to real alterations produced in vivo by the hormone treatment.
Supression of endogenous GH
It has been reported previously that exogenous GH will suppress endogenous release of the hormone (19,23) and that this effect may be mediated in part by elevated levels of IGF-I (23). On a preliminary basis, we found that treatment for 6 wk with supraphysiological doses of met-hGH produced an impaired endogenous GH response to stimulation in some, but not all, of our subjects. This variable response may be related to the amount of hormone used in the study. Although a significant group elevation in IGF-I levels occurred during the met-hGH treatment, this response was still below the upper limit of normal (2.20 U/ml) for the study group. Thus it is plausible that the treatment dose of met-hGH used and the subsequent moderate increase in IGF-I levels led to feedback suppression of endogenous GH release in five of the seven subjects measured for this effect, whereas these physiological events were insufficient to produce this effect in two of the subjects.
Intense exercise increases sensitivity to GH??
...One possible explanation for the disparity between our findings and those of others (25, 26) is that the stress of long-term, intensive exercise training could induce alterations in vivo, which might potentiate tissue sensitivity to the physiological actions of GH (2). In any case, it is clear from our findings that supraphysiological doses of met-hGH increased circulating concentrations of IGF-I and increased FFW (fat free weight) and decreased FW (fat weight) in highly conditioned, exercising adults.
Soft-tissue Overgrowth?
There are two principal adverse reactions associated with excessive amounts of human GH, carbohydrate intolerance, and soft-tissue overgrowth. In the present study, we measured fasting blood glucose levels periodically throughout each treatment and found no real changes suggestive of a hyperglycemic response to methGH. Because soft-tissue overgrowth is associated with abnormally high levels of IGF-I, the normal responses observed suggest that the chance for soft-tissue overgrowth occurring in our subjects was minimal. However, it is unreasonable to conclude that use of met-hGH is safe as an adjunct to exercise in healthy adults until more subjects are studied over longer periods of time and with more stringent tests for detecting changes in glucose tolerance and soft-tissue overgrowth.
Diet used
To avoid compromising the dietary requirements for optimal tissue anabolism during the met-hGH treatment, our subjects ingested between 2.05 and 2.10 g/kg a day of protein and a minimum number of kilocalories to maintain body weight. The kilocaloric requirement removed the potential bias from a dietary-induced FW loss.
In Conclusion
We conclude that treatment with supraphysiological doses of met-hGH will significantly alter body composition in adults who are highly conditioned from years of exercise training. The magnitude of this effect, however, is dependent in part on the amount of hormone given per body weight of the individual rather than endogenous GH secretory status. Changes in body composition are directly related to met-hGH administration, but the manifestations of treatment may be mediated in part by increased production of IGF-I or other GH-dependent serum anabolic factors. Moreover, supraphysiological treatment with met-hGH in exercising adults may produce impairments in the stimulated release of endogenous GH in some individuals.
-
06-05-2013, 07:24 AM #504Banned
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- somewhere on earth
- Posts
- 1,355
Great read. N1 yet again
-
06-05-2013, 08:39 AM #505Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2012
- Posts
- 419
great read . thanks
-
Originally Posted by marcus300
-
06-07-2013, 08:31 AM #507Junior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Location
- Boston
- Posts
- 102
Thanks for the post marcus. Do you feel EOD protocol is good for QOL anti ageing, or more for BB?
-
If eod is so effective then why don't they prescribe that protocol when you go to an anti aging clinic?
-
06-07-2013, 08:45 AM #509
A lot of common practices of modern medicine are not necessarily the most superior approach, particularly in this area of medicine. Not to say they aren't good, just sometimes fall a little short. You'll find that subspecialties that are heavily studied and investigated, such as critical care, cardiology, infectious disease, and so forth demonstrate a much higher rate of "best practices".
-
06-07-2013, 09:10 AM #510Junior Member
- Join Date
- May 2013
- Posts
- 125
Because anti aging is a lifestyle based on long term hgh supplementation with an emphasis on healthy living, not tissue growth. Obviously patients are also looking for aesthetic improvements but no AA clinic will script a patient for almost 8ius eod. Off label hgh use for AA is a gray area to begin with since that's not what it's approved for.
-
That all makes sense. I'm also not naive enough to think Dr's are always right. Hgh just seems like one of those compounds were theories constantly change. As soon as you think you have all the data then another study comes out proving your previous theory all wrong. Makes sense tho, any newer compound goes through this process. I'd bet it doesn't really matter too much when you take it but that's just a gut instinct.
-
06-07-2013, 10:25 AM #512
-
Why does the fda suck so bad. They have no problem licensing drugs they know will probably cause a lawsuit within a decade due to fukd up side effects
-
06-07-2013, 03:52 PM #514New Member
- Join Date
- May 2013
- Posts
- 12
wow tons of great info in here, looks like i have some reading to do.
-
06-07-2013, 04:33 PM #515Banned
- Join Date
- May 2013
- Location
- Kiev, Ukraine
- Posts
- 175
-
06-07-2013, 04:34 PM #516Banned
- Join Date
- May 2013
- Location
- Kiev, Ukraine
- Posts
- 175
-
06-07-2013, 06:11 PM #517
If you look at the prescribing inserts of at least some hgh preparations, it states 2.7iu = 1mg
-
06-11-2013, 03:42 AM #518Banned
- Join Date
- May 2013
- Location
- Kiev, Ukraine
- Posts
- 175
Well this stuff certainly works. My IGF-1 quadrupled after 3 weeks of 2IU/day! I will try 1IU/day for a while.
-
06-11-2013, 08:07 AM #519Originally Posted by imom
-
06-12-2013, 05:56 AM #520Banned
- Join Date
- May 2013
- Location
- Kiev, Ukraine
- Posts
- 175
Both tests were done late morning with no food or drink since previous day.
Second test was done before my daily injections, so 24 hours since previous shot.
My IGF-1 was at 141 ng/ml (lab range: 160-318)
My IGF-1 is now at 692 after taking just 2IU per day for 3 weeks. This is more than I want so I will scale down and retest in a few weeks. I also started Test replacement therapy (75mg Test Prop/week) at the same time so there might have been some synergy going on there.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
Yesterday, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS