Page 13 of 25 FirstFirst ... 38910111213141516171823 ... LastLast
Results 481 to 520 of 961
Like Tree135Likes

Thread: Ukrainian/Russian Jintropin

  1. #481
    The Titan99's Avatar
    The Titan99 is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Thailand
    Posts
    1,710
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by marcus300 View Post
    By the time we reach the age of 30 years old are hgh levels are already declining and continue to at around 12 to 15% per decade and between the ages of 30-40yrs old the amount we produce anyway isn't enough to repair all the damage what's occurring through our natural aging process ahyway. So I wouldn't worry to much about preserving your natural hgh levels because if using exogenous gh your tiny amount of natural gh is going to be supressed anyway.


    I think LR3 is a complete waste of money and its all hype your better sticking with hgh IMHO and wouldn't advice over the internet regarding slin due to how dangerous it can be if not used correctly so I only advice regarding slin face to face. I've only ever tried it twice and didn't like it and found better results with other hormones.
    So rather than mess with the IGF-1, you'd think it would be a better use of $$ to just go to 8-10 i.u.'s of GH (that would actually be a little cheaper.)?

  2. #482
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline ~Retired~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    40,922
    Quote Originally Posted by The Titan99 View Post
    So rather than mess with the IGF-1, you'd think it would be a better use of $$ to just go to 8-10 i.u.'s of GH (that would actually be a little cheaper.)?
    Yes I do

  3. #483
    The Titan99's Avatar
    The Titan99 is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Thailand
    Posts
    1,710
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by snowblowjoe View Post
    I'm going to get back on in a month or so and I'm going to do 5 on 2 off at 2iu. If lethargy comes into play even with that low of a dose then I will do it before bed
    This is the definition of bi polar posting. What are you going to do about the crippling joint pain? I guess you could stack it with massive doses of Vicodin...
    marcus300 likes this.

  4. #484
    imom is offline Banned
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Kiev, Ukraine
    Posts
    175
    Quote Originally Posted by marcus300 View Post
    What disadvantages have you seen because your gh output is slightly lower than the normal and what advantages do you really think 2ius is going to give you?
    If the lab range represents 95% of results (I don't know which percentile they are using) then I'd be in the bottom 1%. I wouldn't call that 'slightly lower' than normal.

    I have seen a few doctors over the years regarding poor sleep, low energy, impaired mental ability, and just low QOL. They just gave me a standard blood panel and when everything came back ok, they shrugged. Then I discovered on my own that my Test and HGH levels were low, and that this could explain my symptoms. I am hoping that restoring these hormones to optimal values will improve my QOL in various ways. It is also healthier to be close to optimal values, as being low in these hormones can lead to many effects such as osteoporosis, early death, etc.

  5. #485
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline ~Retired~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    40,922
    Quote Originally Posted by imom View Post
    If the lab range represents 95% of results (I don't know which percentile they are using) then I'd be in the bottom 1%. I wouldn't call that 'slightly lower' than normal.

    I have seen a few doctors over the years regarding poor sleep, low energy, impaired mental ability, and just low QOL. They just gave me a standard blood panel and when everything came back ok, they shrugged. Then I discovered on my own that my Test and HGH levels were low, and that this could explain my symptoms. I am hoping that restoring these hormones to optimal values will improve my QOL in various ways. It is also healthier to be close to optimal values, as being low in these hormones can lead to many effects such as osteoporosis, early death, etc.
    If you test is low then that will be the cause of your issues, get your self on trt asap

  6. #486
    imom is offline Banned
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Kiev, Ukraine
    Posts
    175
    Quote Originally Posted by marcus300 View Post
    If you test is low then that will be the cause of your issues, get your self on trt asap
    Thanks, I started that a few weeks ago too.

  7. #487
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline ~Retired~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    40,922
    Quote Originally Posted by imom View Post
    Thanks, I started that a few weeks ago too.
    Give it a few weeks and I am sure things will get better for you, low T is a living hell. All you need to is get yourself balanced properly and this can take time but once you have your life will feel better again.

  8. #488
    snowblowjoe's Avatar
    snowblowjoe is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,267
    Blog Entries
    1
    That's why I'm starting at such a low dosage bro. To mitigate the joint pain. I'm not doing it anytime soon. I feel good again tho no joint pain.

  9. #489
    slimshady01's Avatar
    slimshady01 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,371
    Marcus!

    Pinning 4iu growth , I always go back and forth as to pin in the AM and PM.. Am would blunt cortisol but at night I feel this is when we repair grow etc..

    Also that being said would 2iu in am then 2 pm work or would you just pop all 4 at once.

  10. #490
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline ~Retired~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    40,922
    Quote Originally Posted by slimshady01 View Post
    Marcus!

    Pinning 4iu growth , I always go back and forth as to pin in the AM and PM.. Am would blunt cortisol but at night I feel this is when we repair grow etc..

    Also that being said would 2iu in am then 2 pm work or would you just pop all 4 at once.
    Something for you to think about,
    There are many ways to administrate gh and ive tried and tested many of them. The suppression comes from elevated IGF levels which last hours so if you are using gh for long periods of time your natural gh pulse is going to be blunted anyway. You also got to understand that there is a reason why the largest natural gh pulse is at night and how large is this pulse if the average man is producing lets says 1.5ius daily. So if your taking exogenous hgh at reasonable dose your natural gh is going to be suppressed and even if it wasn't suppressed its not worth saving anyway because you don't produce enough even if your night time pulse was half of your daily hgh output. So if all the growth factors and benefits happen during REM when our largest pulse is activated then why not follow your natural body's rhythm and inject the largest amount at night to get the most benefits out of your exogenous hgh.

  11. #491
    slimshady01's Avatar
    slimshady01 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,371
    Quote Originally Posted by marcus300

    Something for you to think about,
    There are many ways to administrate gh and ive tried and tested many of them. The suppression comes from elevated IGF levels which last hours so if you are using gh for long periods of time your natural gh pulse is going to be blunted anyway. You also got to understand that there is a reason why the largest natural gh pulse is at night and how large is this pulse if the average man is producing lets says 1.5ius daily. So if your taking exogenous hgh at reasonable dose your natural gh is going to be suppressed and even if it wasn't suppressed its not worth saving anyway because you don't produce enough even if your night time pulse was half of your daily hgh output. So if all the growth factors and benefits happen during REM when our largest pulse is activated then why not follow your natural body's rhythm and inject the largest amount at night to get the most benefits out of your exogenous hgh.
    That's exactly what kept me thinking to pin all 4iu at night..

    For some reason I always liked pinning before bed and as of now I will take my 4iu at night..

    Thanks Marcus .

  12. #492
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline ~Retired~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    40,922
    Quote Originally Posted by slimshady01 View Post
    That's exactly what kept me thinking to pin all 4iu at night..

    For some reason I always liked pinning before bed and as of now I will take my 4iu at night..

    Thanks Marcus .
    I'd still split the dose into 2 ius but pin one at night, better still would be if you was on more ius then pin the largest amount at night...

  13. #493
    slimshady01's Avatar
    slimshady01 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,371
    Quote Originally Posted by marcus300

    I'd still split the dose into 2 ius but pin one at night, better still would be if you was on more ius then pin the largest amount at night...
    Thanks again

  14. #494
    freshmaker is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    So. Cal
    Posts
    125
    I wear a sleep monitor that calculates light vs deep sleep. I've noticed that when I pin at night my sleep is much deeper. Just for that i pin an hour before bed.

  15. #495
    snowblowjoe's Avatar
    snowblowjoe is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,267
    Blog Entries
    1
    What's the difference between light and deep sleep? Is deep just rem sleep and light does not have any rem activity?

  16. #496
    human project's Avatar
    human project is offline Knowledgeable Member~Recognized Member Winner - $100
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,909
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by marcus300

    What do you expect 2 ius of gh is going to do to you? IMHO it will do nothing or very close to nothing when you take in what we produce naturally. Its a pointless exercise running 2ius unless your going to start low and ramp it up to 4ius were you will see some fat loss and condition and the usually health benefits over time but 2 ius imho will do nothing when young adolescents secrete HGH at the rate of about 700 ?g/day, while healthy adults secrete HGH at the rate of about 400 ?g/day. which works out very close to 2 ius naturally so you shutting down a system and replacing it with the same.

    1mg = 3iu
    700ug = .7mg
    .7mg = 2.1iu This is how much HGH an adolescent secretes in a day
    .4mg = 1.2iu This is how much HGH an adult secretes in a day

    (Gardner, David G., Shoback, Dolores (2007). Greenspan's Basic and Clinical Endocrinology (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Medical. pp. 193–201. ISBN 0-07-144011-9.)

    If you have used real hgh fro any length of time you will understand what dosages do t the body, they is no quick results with gh its a time thing and you need to use a min of 4 ius to see some health benefits and slight fat loss, you want to see muscle tissue gains and serious results you need to be running at least 8ius+ for 6months at least.
    Do you think 2iu's per shot 2-4 times a day is better or taking 4-8iu's at one time daily?

  17. #497
    human project's Avatar
    human project is offline Knowledgeable Member~Recognized Member Winner - $100
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,909
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by AnabolicDoc

    But your weekly dose is the same, right? For instance, instead of 3iu ed, you'd do 6iu eod? That's how it's recommended to optimize GH use in the educational part of this site. I haven't seen that elsewhere but I haven't looked specifically for it. (Edited to read as if English was my first language)
    Why is every other day better?? So is splitting dsily doses bad also. Would it be best to just take a very large dose three times a week.??? I currently take 2ius 2 times a day 6 on 1 off... I also take a couple 2-5 iu's after really hard workouts where I use insulin .

  18. #498
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline ~Retired~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    40,922
    Quote Originally Posted by human project View Post
    Do you think 2iu's per shot 2-4 times a day is better or taking 4-8iu's at one time daily?
    I have a article which I will post when I get chance to search for it on my other computer what's states the best dose would be
    6-8ius a day split into two doses and I think its stressed that you should have 5 -7 hours inbetween injections. One being at night time. It makes really good reading.

    If your hgh protocol is working stick with it, why change if your getting results. On a personal note I would prefer two injection per day.


    be a total six to eight IU a day divided into two doses and having those five to seven hours apart. For example, a dose (either three or four IU) can be taken post training with another three to four IU dose before bed or during the night sleeping period."

  19. #499
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline ~Retired~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    40,922
    Quote Originally Posted by human project View Post
    Why is every other day better?? So is splitting dsily doses bad also. Would it be best to just take a very large dose three times a week.??? I currently take 2ius 2 times a day 6 on 1 off... I also take a couple 2-5 iu's after really hard workouts where I use insulin.
    Ive had excellent results from EOD and E3D when I was running a heavy blast cycle with a large amount of gh.

  20. #500
    human project's Avatar
    human project is offline Knowledgeable Member~Recognized Member Winner - $100
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,909
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by marcus300

    Ive had excellent results from EOD and E3D when I was running a heavy blast cycle with a large amount of gh.
    So 4-5iu's 2 times a day "10 iu's per day" three times a week would be better then 2.5iu's 2 times a day 6 on 1 off..... They both add up to a total of 30iu's per week but my question is are you saying that 3 times a week would be better for muscle growth?? You also said on a blast; I'm currently only running trt dose..... Does this matter?? Sorry for all the questions I just spend so much on gh "the most expensive part of bodybuilding" so I want to make sure I get the most for my money.....

  21. #501
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline ~Retired~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    40,922
    Quote Originally Posted by human project View Post
    So 4-5iu's 2 times a day "10 iu's per day" three times a week would be better then 2.5iu's 2 times a day 6 on 1 off..... They both add up to a total of 30iu's per week but my question is are you saying that 3 times a week would be better for muscle growth?? You also said on a blast; I'm currently only running trt dose..... Does this matter?? Sorry for all the questions I just spend so much on gh "the most expensive part of bodybuilding" so I want to make sure I get the most for my money.....
    When I ran eod and e3d high dose it was on a heavy burst cycle, so I wouldn't run it like that on trt and you shouldn't be running a high dose anyway on trt. The best results for tissue growth are when you mix hgh with aas the synergy is remarkable but if your off cycle and just running trt then you should be around 4 ius IMHO.

    There are many ways to run hgh, ive been running it lately ed for months now even on cycle, I only did eod and e3d when I was bulking heavy and wanted to gain serious muscle tissue.

  22. #502
    AnabolicDoc's Avatar
    AnabolicDoc is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    777
    Quote Originally Posted by human project View Post

    Why is every other day better?? So is splitting dsily doses bad also. Would it be best to just take a very large dose three times a week.??? I currently take 2ius 2 times a day 6 on 1 off... I also take a couple 2-5 iu's after really hard workouts where I use insulin.
    Sound like marcus answered all your questions, which is great bc I didn't know a lot of the answers. Thanks marcus!

  23. #503
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline ~Retired~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    40,922
    Interesting study I found on my computer what you guys may enjoy reading, also confirms some of the things ive been expressing over the last few posts. Study also shows positive results running high dose EOD protocol's


    Body composition response to exogenous GH during training in highly conditioned adults, D. M. Crist, J Appl Physiol 65: 579-584, 1988

    Intro:
    The effects of biosynthetic methionyl-human growth hormone (met-hGH) on body composition and endogenous secretion of growth hormone (GH) and insulin -like growth factor I (IGF-I) were studied in eight well-trained exercising adults between 22 and 33 yr of age for 6 weeks.


    Dosing & Administration:
    The met-hGH (experimental) treatment consisted of 8.0 mg (2 U/mg) per week of methGH (Protropin; Genentech, San Francisco, CA), which was divided into three doses (2.67 mg/dose) and delivered on alternate days (3 days/wk) in 0.5 ml of bacteriostatic diluent. Because of differences in the body weights of the subjects, the relative dose range varied between 0.03 and 0.05 mg/kg per injection. Injections were given between 0800 and 1500, and their delivery was rotated among four to six sites throughout the study period. Treatments were administered on a double-blind basis with neither the experimental subject nor the person administering the injections knowing which treatment was being delivered. The total weekly dose of met-hGH used in this study (8.0 mg) was considered supraphysiological, since the spontaneous release of human GH during a 24-h period is purportedly -0.68 mg (4.8 mg/wk) in men and 0.79 mg (5.5 mg/wk) in women (30), similar to amounts reported by others (6).


    CONCLUSION
    In the present study, we found that alternate-day treatment with met-hGH altered body composition in highly conditioned, exercising adults by increasing FFW (fat free weight), decreasing %fat, and increasing FFW (fat free weight)/FW (fat weight). These changes were significantly greater than those produced by exercise alone.
    ...
    Moreover we found that supraphysiological amounts of met-hGH were sufficient to significantly elevate circulating concentrations of IGF-I in all our subjects, confirming that the changes in body composition were indeed due to real alterations produced in vivo by the hormone treatment.


    Supression of endogenous GH
    It has been reported previously that exogenous GH will suppress endogenous release of the hormone (19,23) and that this effect may be mediated in part by elevated levels of IGF-I (23). On a preliminary basis, we found that treatment for 6 wk with supraphysiological doses of met-hGH produced an impaired endogenous GH response to stimulation in some, but not all, of our subjects. This variable response may be related to the amount of hormone used in the study. Although a significant group elevation in IGF-I levels occurred during the met-hGH treatment, this response was still below the upper limit of normal (2.20 U/ml) for the study group. Thus it is plausible that the treatment dose of met-hGH used and the subsequent moderate increase in IGF-I levels led to feedback suppression of endogenous GH release in five of the seven subjects measured for this effect, whereas these physiological events were insufficient to produce this effect in two of the subjects.


    Intense exercise increases sensitivity to GH??
    ...One possible explanation for the disparity between our findings and those of others (25, 26) is that the stress of long-term, intensive exercise training could induce alterations in vivo, which might potentiate tissue sensitivity to the physiological actions of GH (2). In any case, it is clear from our findings that supraphysiological doses of met-hGH increased circulating concentrations of IGF-I and increased FFW (fat free weight) and decreased FW (fat weight) in highly conditioned, exercising adults.


    Soft-tissue Overgrowth?
    There are two principal adverse reactions associated with excessive amounts of human GH, carbohydrate intolerance, and soft-tissue overgrowth. In the present study, we measured fasting blood glucose levels periodically throughout each treatment and found no real changes suggestive of a hyperglycemic response to methGH. Because soft-tissue overgrowth is associated with abnormally high levels of IGF-I, the normal responses observed suggest that the chance for soft-tissue overgrowth occurring in our subjects was minimal. However, it is unreasonable to conclude that use of met-hGH is safe as an adjunct to exercise in healthy adults until more subjects are studied over longer periods of time and with more stringent tests for detecting changes in glucose tolerance and soft-tissue overgrowth.


    Diet used
    To avoid compromising the dietary requirements for optimal tissue anabolism during the met-hGH treatment, our subjects ingested between 2.05 and 2.10 g/kg a day of protein and a minimum number of kilocalories to maintain body weight. The kilocaloric requirement removed the potential bias from a dietary-induced FW loss.


    In Conclusion
    We conclude that treatment with supraphysiological doses of met-hGH will significantly alter body composition in adults who are highly conditioned from years of exercise training. The magnitude of this effect, however, is dependent in part on the amount of hormone given per body weight of the individual rather than endogenous GH secretory status. Changes in body composition are directly related to met-hGH administration, but the manifestations of treatment may be mediated in part by increased production of IGF-I or other GH-dependent serum anabolic factors. Moreover, supraphysiological treatment with met-hGH in exercising adults may produce impairments in the stimulated release of endogenous GH in some individuals.

  24. #504
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    somewhere on earth
    Posts
    1,355
    Great read. N1 yet again

  25. #505
    swithuk is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    419
    great read . thanks

  26. #506
    human project's Avatar
    human project is offline Knowledgeable Member~Recognized Member Winner - $100
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,909
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by marcus300
    Interesting study I found on my computer what you guys may enjoy reading, also confirms some of the things ive been expressing over the last few posts. Study also shows positive results running high dose EOD protocol's

    Body composition response to exogenous GH during training in highly conditioned adults, D. M. Crist, J Appl Physiol 65: 579-584, 1988

    Intro:
    The effects of biosynthetic methionyl-human growth hormone (met-hGH) on body composition and endogenous secretion of growth hormone (GH) and insulin -like growth factor I (IGF-I) were studied in eight well-trained exercising adults between 22 and 33 yr of age for 6 weeks.

    Dosing & Administration:
    The met-hGH (experimental) treatment consisted of 8.0 mg (2 U/mg) per week of methGH (Protropin; Genentech, San Francisco, CA), which was divided into three doses (2.67 mg/dose) and delivered on alternate days (3 days/wk) in 0.5 ml of bacteriostatic diluent. Because of differences in the body weights of the subjects, the relative dose range varied between 0.03 and 0.05 mg/kg per injection. Injections were given between 0800 and 1500, and their delivery was rotated among four to six sites throughout the study period. Treatments were administered on a double-blind basis with neither the experimental subject nor the person administering the injections knowing which treatment was being delivered. The total weekly dose of met-hGH used in this study (8.0 mg) was considered supraphysiological, since the spontaneous release of human GH during a 24-h period is purportedly -0.68 mg (4.8 mg/wk) in men and 0.79 mg (5.5 mg/wk) in women (30), similar to amounts reported by others (6).

    CONCLUSION
    In the present study, we found that alternate-day treatment with met-hGH altered body composition in highly conditioned, exercising adults by increasing FFW (fat free weight), decreasing %fat, and increasing FFW (fat free weight)/FW (fat weight). These changes were significantly greater than those produced by exercise alone.
    ...
    Moreover we found that supraphysiological amounts of met-hGH were sufficient to significantly elevate circulating concentrations of IGF-I in all our subjects, confirming that the changes in body composition were indeed due to real alterations produced in vivo by the hormone treatment.

    Supression of endogenous GH
    It has been reported previously that exogenous GH will suppress endogenous release of the hormone (19,23) and that this effect may be mediated in part by elevated levels of IGF-I (23). On a preliminary basis, we found that treatment for 6 wk with supraphysiological doses of met-hGH produced an impaired endogenous GH response to stimulation in some, but not all, of our subjects. This variable response may be related to the amount of hormone used in the study. Although a significant group elevation in IGF-I levels occurred during the met-hGH treatment, this response was still below the upper limit of normal (2.20 U/ml) for the study group. Thus it is plausible that the treatment dose of met-hGH used and the subsequent moderate increase in IGF-I levels led to feedback suppression of endogenous GH release in five of the seven subjects measured for this effect, whereas these physiological events were insufficient to produce this effect in two of the subjects.

    Intense exercise increases sensitivity to GH??
    ...One possible explanation for the disparity between our findings and those of others (25, 26) is that the stress of long-term, intensive exercise training could induce alterations in vivo, which might potentiate tissue sensitivity to the physiological actions of GH (2). In any case, it is clear from our findings that supraphysiological doses of met-hGH increased circulating concentrations of IGF-I and increased FFW (fat free weight) and decreased FW (fat weight) in highly conditioned, exercising adults.

    Soft-tissue Overgrowth?
    There are two principal adverse reactions associated with excessive amounts of human GH, carbohydrate intolerance, and soft-tissue overgrowth. In the present study, we measured fasting blood glucose levels periodically throughout each treatment and found no real changes suggestive of a hyperglycemic response to methGH. Because soft-tissue overgrowth is associated with abnormally high levels of IGF-I, the normal responses observed suggest that the chance for soft-tissue overgrowth occurring in our subjects was minimal. However, it is unreasonable to conclude that use of met-hGH is safe as an adjunct to exercise in healthy adults until more subjects are studied over longer periods of time and with more stringent tests for detecting changes in glucose tolerance and soft-tissue overgrowth.

    Diet used
    To avoid compromising the dietary requirements for optimal tissue anabolism during the met-hGH treatment, our subjects ingested between 2.05 and 2.10 g/kg a day of protein and a minimum number of kilocalories to maintain body weight. The kilocaloric requirement removed the potential bias from a dietary-induced FW loss.

    In Conclusion
    We conclude that treatment with supraphysiological doses of met-hGH will significantly alter body composition in adults who are highly conditioned from years of exercise training. The magnitude of this effect, however, is dependent in part on the amount of hormone given per body weight of the individual rather than endogenous GH secretory status. Changes in body composition are directly related to met-hGH administration, but the manifestations of treatment may be mediated in part by increased production of IGF-I or other GH-dependent serum anabolic factors. Moreover, supraphysiological treatment with met-hGH in exercising adults may produce impairments in the stimulated release of endogenous GH in some individuals.
    So how man actual iu's were administered per injection?? I know its 2.7ius per mg but I'm confused with how I would use this method.... I'm 250lbs

  27. #507
    ImpeccableChaos is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    102
    Thanks for the post marcus. Do you feel EOD protocol is good for QOL anti ageing, or more for BB?

  28. #508
    snowblowjoe's Avatar
    snowblowjoe is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,267
    Blog Entries
    1
    If eod is so effective then why don't they prescribe that protocol when you go to an anti aging clinic?

  29. #509
    AnabolicDoc's Avatar
    AnabolicDoc is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    777
    A lot of common practices of modern medicine are not necessarily the most superior approach, particularly in this area of medicine. Not to say they aren't good, just sometimes fall a little short. You'll find that subspecialties that are heavily studied and investigated, such as critical care, cardiology, infectious disease, and so forth demonstrate a much higher rate of "best practices".

  30. #510
    Rick Kane is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    125
    Quote Originally Posted by snowblowjoe View Post
    If eod is so effective then why don't they prescribe that protocol when you go to an anti aging clinic?
    Because anti aging is a lifestyle based on long term hgh supplementation with an emphasis on healthy living, not tissue growth. Obviously patients are also looking for aesthetic improvements but no AA clinic will script a patient for almost 8ius eod. Off label hgh use for AA is a gray area to begin with since that's not what it's approved for.

  31. #511
    snowblowjoe's Avatar
    snowblowjoe is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,267
    Blog Entries
    1
    That all makes sense. I'm also not naive enough to think Dr's are always right. Hgh just seems like one of those compounds were theories constantly change. As soon as you think you have all the data then another study comes out proving your previous theory all wrong. Makes sense tho, any newer compound goes through this process. I'd bet it doesn't really matter too much when you take it but that's just a gut instinct.

  32. #512
    AnabolicDoc's Avatar
    AnabolicDoc is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    777
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick Kane View Post
    Because anti aging is a lifestyle based on long term hgh supplementation with an emphasis on healthy living, not tissue growth. Obviously patients are also looking for aesthetic improvements but no AA clinic will script a patient for almost 8ius eod. Off label hgh use for AA is a gray area to begin with since that's not what it's approved for.
    The FDA had actually gone as far as prohibiting the prescribing of hgh for anti-aging or related purposes. Violating these restrictions is punishable by harsh actions (such as loss of licensing) and/or fines.

  33. #513
    snowblowjoe's Avatar
    snowblowjoe is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,267
    Blog Entries
    1
    Why does the fda suck so bad. They have no problem licensing drugs they know will probably cause a lawsuit within a decade due to fukd up side effects

  34. #514
    Believe is offline New Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    12
    wow tons of great info in here, looks like i have some reading to do.

  35. #515
    imom is offline Banned
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Kiev, Ukraine
    Posts
    175
    Quote Originally Posted by marcus300 View Post
    Interesting study I found on my computer ...
    Thanks for posting that. It's a pity that it wasn't more specific about the endogenous HGH suppression. "An impaired endogenous GH response" could mean 5% or 95%.

  36. #516
    imom is offline Banned
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Kiev, Ukraine
    Posts
    175
    Quote Originally Posted by human project View Post
    So how man actual iu's were administered per injection?? I know its 2.7ius per mg but I'm confused with how I would use this method.... I'm 250lbs
    It's equivalent to 3 IU per day.

  37. #517
    AnabolicDoc's Avatar
    AnabolicDoc is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    777
    If you look at the prescribing inserts of at least some hgh preparations, it states 2.7iu = 1mg

  38. #518
    imom is offline Banned
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Kiev, Ukraine
    Posts
    175
    Well this stuff certainly works. My IGF-1 quadrupled after 3 weeks of 2IU/day! I will try 1IU/day for a while.

  39. #519
    slimshady01's Avatar
    slimshady01 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    1,371
    Quote Originally Posted by imom
    Well this stuff certainly works. My IGF-1 quadrupled after 3 weeks of 2IU/day! I will try 1IU/day for a while.
    When did u get bloods done and what were before and after lvls exact ?

  40. #520
    imom is offline Banned
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Kiev, Ukraine
    Posts
    175
    Quote Originally Posted by slimshady01 View Post
    When did u get bloods done and what were before and after lvls exact ?
    Both tests were done late morning with no food or drink since previous day.
    Second test was done before my daily injections, so 24 hours since previous shot.

    My IGF-1 was at 141 ng/ml (lab range: 160-318)

    My IGF-1 is now at 692 after taking just 2IU per day for 3 weeks. This is more than I want so I will scale down and retest in a few weeks. I also started Test replacement therapy (75mg Test Prop/week) at the same time so there might have been some synergy going on there.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •