August Most Improved Competition

[Capebuffalo]

Obs your belly is hanging over your underwear and you have love handles. Win most improved loose the fat.

[Obs]

No f-ing way you're 15%. You're 18-20% Obs. I'm not trying to give you shit I'm just being honest.

I was 17 at the end of comp. I know my skin. You argued then so I went and got tested and what do you know I was dead the fuck on. You fuckers were saying 24%

God you guys irritate me with that guess work shit. Half of you say dexascan is wrong half of you say bodpod is wrong and then all you dumb shits think you can look at a picture and fucking nail it.

I am 15 percent.

[Capebuffalo]

I was 17 at the end of comp. I know my skin. You argued then so I went and got tested and what do you know I was dead the fuck on. You fuckers were saying 24%

God you guys irritate me with that guess work shit. Half of you say dexascan is wrong half of you say bodpod is wrong and then all you dumb shits think you can look at a picture and fucking nail it.

I am 15 percent.

Well I nailed your belly.

[Obs]

Obs your belly is hanging over your underwear and you have love handles. Win most improved loose the fat.

I hear all of you say shit like: at 15 percent all your abs are visible etc. No, that is all generalization that doesnt work. People are genetically predispositioned to accumulate fat in certain areas. For some its ass others its under the arms and for guys like me it is the belly and that is it. That is a relaxed shot and you can see my abs but barely because that is most of the fat storage on my body. I dont carry fat other places comparably. I am a gd brick.
Loose the fat win the comp... You said that last time huh?

[Capebuffalo]

[Capebuffalo]

I did say that last time. Before sand afters




It's obvious who Improved more

[Obs]

I did say that last time. Before sand afters




It's obvious who Improved more

I was the only one in the comp who posted pumped before photos. You improved by throwing a pump on.

[Obs]

And?

[AKD_FitChick]

Do you guys ever get tired of saying the same stuff? It's like reading the same thing from months ago. How about new stuff? What about your lifts? Food? Motivation?

I want to know who can piss further?

p.s.

All of you look great! You all have amazing parts to your physiques!



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Quester]

I agree with OBS regarding scientific (actual) BF%. BF% isn't a measure of aesthetics therefore, using a picture to compare to isn't at all scientific.
-For instance, a larger frame (bone structure) will decrease BF% simply because one has more LBM (and not even muscle-just the other parts), but you may not see this from an aesthetic standpoint. If BB comps were based on science they could just take dex-scans and measurements and send the results in from home.
-Another for instance, A small tennis ball with a thick cover over it has a higher percentage of cover-to-mass versus a much larger ball with a cover of the same thickness.
-That being said, "these competitions are in the style of BB-comps, aesthetics is the focus.
-Perhaps you guys are arguing over two distinct things: the appearance of BF v actual BF?

[NACH3]

More intense? Why do you lay claim to things you have no clue about pussy?

Keep denying the truth brother it makes you look worse! Lol

[Quester]

FitChick,
Are you talking about actually pissing further or the appearance of pissing further? And, how can we measure?
We can't measure that either, obscenity laws.

[NACH3]

I agree with OBS regarding scientific (actual) BF%. BF% isn't a measure of aesthetics therefore, using a picture to compare to isn't at all scientific.
-For instance, a larger frame (bone structure) will decrease BF% simply because one has more LBM (and not even muscle-just the other parts), but you may not see this from an aesthetic standpoint. If BB comps were based on science they could just take dex-scans and measurements and send the results in from home.
-Another for instance, A small tennis ball with a thick cover over it has a higher percentage of cover-to-mass versus a much larger ball with a cover of the same thickness.
-That being said, "these competitions are in the style of BB-comps, aesthetics is the focus.
-Perhaps you guys are arguing over two distinct things: the appearance of BF v actual BF?

Not true dexa scans are the way to tell actual bf %! It's the most consistent and accurate way weigh telling bone structure along with bf% as well as visceral fat and muscle - look at the color coding it tells it all!

[AKD_FitChick]

FitChick,
Are you talking about actually pissing further or the appearance of pissing further? And, how can we measure?
We can't measure that either, obscenity laws.

Actually pissing further!!!! That's a true test of manhood!

Completely kidding!

I just get bored reading the same arguments overs months now. I completely agree with you on BF though! You cannot tell by a picture. Although I have heard dexa scans are pretty accurate.

I think I need to read a different place


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Quester]

Maybe I typoed.
I'm saying Dexa will give the true, accurate, scientific, actual BF%
We are not using Dexa, we are using aesthetic appearance, just like a BB-comp.
And, we all have agreed to do that.

[NACH3]

I agree with OBS regarding scientific (actual) BF%. BF% isn't a measure of aesthetics therefore, using a picture to compare to isn't at all scientific.
-For instance, a larger frame (bone structure) will decrease BF% simply because one has more LBM (and not even muscle-just the other parts), but you may not see this from an aesthetic standpoint. If BB comps were based on science they could just take dex-scans and measurements and send the results in from home.
-Another for instance, A small tennis ball with a thick cover over it has a higher percentage of cover-to-mass versus a much larger ball with a cover of the same thickness.
-That being said, "these competitions are in the style of BB-comps, aesthetics is the focus.
-Perhaps you guys are arguing over two distinct things: the appearance of BF v actual BF?

In bold - how isn't bf% a roll in aesthetics??? That's all aesthetics's is/are?!?! Get down to a specific bf% and win a comp easy as 123! That's not that scientific if you ask me?! I'd like to hear your opinion as I respect it

[Quester]

We posted at same time.

[NACH3]

Actually pissing further!!!! That's a true test of manhood!

Completely kidding!

I just get bored reading the same arguments overs months now. I completely agree with you on BF though! You cannot tell by a picture. Although I have heard dexa scans are pretty accurate.

I think I need to read a different place


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

At high test I can't piss 'that' far but still good distance lol - but got all the other sides that my gf needs lmao

[NACH3]

FitChick,
Are you talking about actually pissing further or the appearance of pissing further? And, how can we measure?
We can't measure that either, obscenity laws.

Sure did lol

[AKD_FitChick]

At high test I can't piss 'that' far but still good distance lol - but got all the other sides that my gf needs lmao

Gotta love test for those reasons! Lucky girl!

I need to get my man some of that. Could go great with my var!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Quester]

Scrubs for OBS


...sorry buddy, couldn't resist.

[kelkel]

Maybe I typoed.
I'm saying Dexa will give the true, accurate, scientific, actual BF%
We are not using Dexa, we are using aesthetic appearance, just like a BB-comp.
And, we all have agreed to do that.

https://examine.com/nutrition/an-acc...at-percentage/

[Obs]

Not true dexa scans are the way to tell actual bf %! It's the most consistent and accurate way weigh telling bone structure along with bf% as well as visceral fat and muscle - look at the color coding it tells it all!

Nach they are all accurate to +or- 1%
Those old arguments are angry people who didnt like what they saw.
People are genetically dispositioned to store bodyfat in different areas. PERIOD

Quest is dead on. You cant look at someones legs and judge their upper or vice versa. Different people have different fat storages.

[hollowedzeus]

i understand both party's points.

however this is BBing style so body fat percentage doesnt matter.

what does matter is what body fat percentage you look like you have. play the genetic hand you're dealt and impress us.

[Obs]

Attachment 170332
Give me this guys bodyfat percentage

[Obs]

Attachment 170333
Any questions?
Body parts mean nothing for total bodyfat percentage. A scan is the only way and the rest is guess.

[Capebuffalo]

Attachment 170332
Give me this guys bodyfat percentage

Give me this guy body fat percentage

[Obs]

Give me this guy body fat percentage

Sorry cape you will need to do a little more work to get that guys bodyfat %.
With proper diet and less beer and good training... We will get you there.

[Capebuffalo]

rnsplg couch yeahbuddy Obs what body part was the best you trained this week?

What are your cals looking like?

What do you think your weak body part is? What are you doing to improve it?

What do you think your best body part is?

[AKD_FitChick]

rnsplg couch yeahbuddy Obs what body part was the best you trained this week?

What are your cals looking like?

What do you think your weak body part is? What are you doing to improve it?

What do you think your best body part is?

Yeah!!!

I want to know too guys!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Obs]

rnsplg couch yeahbuddy Obs what body part was the best you trained this week?

What are your cals looking like?

What do you think your weak body part is? What are you doing to improve it?

What do you think your best body part is?

Legs. Low. Belly. Grow every other body part so it seems smaller.
Lets not get nasty.
#2 is my back.

[yeahbuddy289]

My calves suck... they measure 15" which is pathetic. But I train them harder than any other body part and just can't seem to grow them. As nach pointed out, I think my best body part is my arms.... last cycle I put almost 2" on them. I put a ton of thickness on my back but I believe I have crappy insertion points so they don't look wide from the front. I naturally have decent traps so I don't go crazy on them.
I'm definitely open to suggestions on what to improve and how to do it.

[NACH3]

My calves suck... they measure 15" which is pathetic. But I train them harder than any other body part and just can't seem to grow them. As nach pointed out, I think my best body part is my arms.... last cycle I put almost 2" on them. I put a ton of thickness on my back but I believe I have crappy insertion points so they don't look wide from the front. I naturally have decent traps so I don't go crazy on them.
I'm definitely open to suggestions on what to improve and how to do it.

Calves first as Kel says - it loosens the legs w/o giving them too much room for fatigue... try it it works - also loosening up your lower back with abs first on leg or back day... does a body good and thank you Kel!

[NACH3]

Attachment 170333
Any questions?
Body parts mean nothing for total bodyfat percentage. A scan is the only way and the rest is guess.

Your absolutely right!

[NACH3]

Sorry cape you will need to do a little more work to get that guys bodyfat %.
With proper diet and less beer and good training... We will get you there.

Not bad there tbh!

[NACH3]

Nach they are all accurate to +or- 1%
Those old arguments are angry people who didnt like what they saw.
People are genetically dispositioned to store bodyfat in different areas. PERIOD

Quest is dead on. You cant look at someones legs and judge their upper or vice versa. Different people have different fat storages.

They are all not accurate to +-1 except Dexa scan! Bod pod +-3% calipers at a 6pojnt hold is +-6% 5% minimum so I don't k ow where your getting your numbers - then there's calipers at a 10-12-16point spot so you tell me what's the accurst?! Firstly not the calipers second only not the bod pod but lastly dexa scan firstly and second to that would be hydrostatic weighing - so your research - no one said one person holds their bf in one section that's ridiculous to even say! It's called diet and training - got that!

[Obs]

They are all not accurate to +-1 except Dexa scan! Bod pod +-3% calipers at a 6pojnt hold is +-6% 5% minimum so I don't k ow where your getting your numbers - then there's calipers at a 10-12-16point spot so you tell me what's the accurst?! Firstly not the calipers second only not the bod pod but lastly dexa scan firstly and second to that would be hydrostatic weighing - so your research - no one said one person holds their bf in one section that's ridiculous to even say! It's called diet and training - got that!

I dont understand what you are saying but you said something nice before that so ok.

[hollowedzeus]

Rnsplg and yeahbuddy. How are you guys getting on?

[yeahbuddy289]

Calves first as Kel says - it loosens the legs w/o giving them too much room for fatigue... try it it works - also loosening up your lower back with abs first on leg or back day... does a body good and thank you Kel!

Nach calves have their own day... I really hammer the crap out of them without much luck...

[yeahbuddy289]

Rnsplg and yeahbuddy. How are you guys getting on?

Not too bad... really tightened things up with my diet and have been hitting the gym hard. I'm in full cycle mode. Can't wait to see what happens when the tren kicks in.